It seems to me that to provide guidance to
the public about climate risks, you would ask questions about things that would affect the public, such as: When will Los Angelenos notice a water shortage?
Not exact matches
Peabody Energy has a responsibility to be honest with investors and the
public about the
risks posed by
climate change, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman said in announcing the settlement with Peabody Monday.
The initiative encourages Americans to think of
climate change as a
risk management issue; the panel aims to clarify and contextualize the science so the
public and decision - makers can be more adequately informed
about those
risks and possible ways to manage them.
Top of her list of duties, according to Ward, should be working to reverse
public misconceptions
about climate change and preparing the nation for its impacts, particularly increased flood
risk.
Permit me to challenge two things; your simplistic description of the
risk perception psychology that explains why the
public doesn't seem to care
about such a huge threat, and more profoundly, the naive belief that
public concern
about climate change can make much difference.
The piece, «The Nerd Loop: Why I'm Losing Interest in Communicating
Climate Change,» is a long disquisition on why there's too much thumb sucking and circular analysis and not enough experimentation among institutions concerned
about public indifference to
risks posed by human - driven global warming.
Marohasy works for the Institute of
Public Affairs which, if you want to talk
about tentacles, is firmly attached to the body of conservative «free market» groups around the world that deny the
risks of human - caused
climate change.
It's their shared apprehension that opposing positions on
climate change are, in effect, badges of membership in and loyalty to competing cultural groups; that is the cue or signal that motivates members of the
public to process information
about climate change
risks in a manner that is more reliably geared to affirming the position that predominates in their group than to converging on the best available evidence.
New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has accused ExxonMobil of lying to the
public and investors
about the
risks of
climate change according to the NY Times and has launched an investigation and issued a subpoena demanding extensive financial records, emails and other documents.
His scholarship, research, and communication
about climate science and economics — especially the impact of government policies that needlessly raise energy costs, condemning the elderly and poor to pain and suffering and even
risks of death — have made valuable contributions to
public knowledge.
The cities say that the oil companies have known
about the
risks of anthropogenic
climate change, but that rather than disclose what they know, the companies engaged in a decades - long campaign to deceive the
public that the science is uncertain.
There is also evidence that media coverage surrounding
climate change is often misleading and that some media organs disseminate falsehoods routinely, thereby denying the
public the right to be accurately informed
about risks from
climate change.
Beyond coal - related carbon emissions being a primary contributor to
climate change, studies have found that coal - fired electricity has significant
public health
risks; a 2016 analysis found that coal dust is responsible for
about 22,900 premature deaths per year throughout the E.U.
What energy companies must do immediately is convey their scientific beliefs and real concerns
about climate change
risks to Congress and the general
public, many of whom do not know what to believe.
Laframboise's trip has been organised by free market think tank the Institute of
Public Affairs, which has a long history of promoting doubt
about the science of human - caused
climate change and the
risks of the unmitigated burning of fossil fuels.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey and New York's Attorney General's Office are investigating whether Exxon misled investors and the
public about climate change
risks.
In addition, the results are pragmatically important because they serve the
public interest: There is ample evidence that the
public is currently not being adequately informed
about the
risks from
climate change, owing largely to flawed media coverage, to which blogs make a contribution.
Organizations around the world to join with IUGG and its member Associations to encourage scientists to communicate freely and widely with
public and private decision - makers
about the consequences and
risks of on - going
climate change and actions that can be taken to limit
climate change and promote adaptation; and
Prosecutors want to see if the company lied to the
public about the
risks of
climate change or to investors
about how such
risks might hurt the oil business.
«There are attempts by some politicians and lobbyists to confuse and mislead the
public about the scientific evidence that human activities are driving
climate change and creating huge
risks,» said Stern.
It is fighting a separate fraud case against allegations it misled the
public — and shareholders —
about climate change
risk.
The office of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent a subpoena to oil company ExxonMobil
about its alleged cover - up of
climate change
risks to the
public and its investors.
In an experiment designed like a game of three - way telephone in which subjects were asked to select and pass on Facebook messages
about climate change, the authors found that a conventional framing of
climate change in terms of environmental
risks was more likely to be shared, compared to less conventional messages emphasizing the
public health and economic benefits to action.
In a blockbuster story, The New York Times reported that New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has subpoenaed oil and gas industry giant ExxonMobil to «determine whether the company lied to the
public about the
risks of
climate change or to investors
about how those
risks might hurt the oil business.»
In light of the lethal track record of denial, one might expect opprobrium to be reserved for those who deny the
public's right to be adequately informed
about risks such as AIDS or
climate change.
Attorneys general in states like California, Massachusetts, and New York will also move forward with their investigations into ExxonMobil's tobacco - style efforts to mislead investors and the
public about the
risks of
climate change.
Most importantly the growing disconnect between what the scientists are saying
about the
risks of
climate change and
public sentiment
about the topic.
Both MRC and CFACT have previously accepted grants from oil company ExxonMobil, which is currently under investigation by the New York attorney general for allegedly lying
about the
risks of
climate change to the
public and investors.
And the Democratic platform advocates, it hasn't been finally, the current Democratic party platform for this year says that they should be investigated for misleading shareholders and the
public about the
risks of
climate change.
California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris is investigating whether Exxon Mobil Corp. repeatedly lied to the
public and its shareholders
about the
risk to its business from
climate change — and whether such actions could amount to securities fraud and violations of environmental laws.