The game, which oddly enough is still listed on the marketplace, received polar reviews from critics and spawned a very
public argument between the Hydrophobia creative director Deborah Jones, Edge magazine and Destructoid's Jim Sterling.
Not exact matches
The decade
between the cloning of Dolly the sheep and the election of Barack Obama was rife with heated
public arguments about embryo research, cloning, assisted reproduction, and other matters bioethical.
Even if you want to lay to one side the very valid concerns about the porn industry's links with human trafficking, or the connections
between hard - core pornography use and sexual violence, there's a strong
argument that this is, in fact, a
public health issue.
The second is that
public debates about science represent a messy clash
between two, not just different, but diametrically opposed approaches to
argument: scientific
argument and advocacy.
Shifting
public arguments, and the boundaries of debates
between parties sometimes requires a willingness to divide, as well as to unite.
What appeared to be a spat
between Labour and Unite over vote - rigging has turned into a
public argument over party funding and a redefinition of the relationship with the unions.
They explore the connections
between science, popular culture, history, and
public policy, to help you understand the evidence and
arguments behind what's in the news, in your life, and on the shelves.
It's not a debate
between public and private education, nor is it an
argument for or against streaming or ability grouping.
On the latter, for example, they note disagreement
between Paul Hill and Robin Lake, colleagues within the Center on Reinventing
Public Education, but they demur on taking a side themselves, declaring, «From where we sit, they both make compelling
arguments.»
The overall
argument of the report — that efforts to bring college preparatory education to
public schools (and improve the rigor of curriculum in American
public education) is contributing to the nation's dropout crisis — doesn't hold water when one knows that the nation's five - year graduation rate has barely budged
between the Classes of 1991 and 2007 (81 percent and 78 percent, respectively).
She also dragged out the tired
argument that the gap
between rich and poor will be exacerbated by «giving a
public subsidy to affluent families that choose elite private schools, which are unlikely to admit students who struggle academically or can not afford tuition even with a voucher.»
You're inspired, you're passionate, you've just received your invitation for an in - depth interview and you're ready to sell your experience about why you're going to make an exceptional Fellow, but... BUT you're not really sure why Betsy DeVos was a controversial choice for Secretary of Education, the
argument between charter school vs traditional
public school vs school vouchers alludes you, and you once thought Common Core was a pilates ab workout.
We've not only been wasting our time and money and resources in a fruitless
argument, but we've been gambling with kids» lives in the name of this intellectual debate about the minuscule difference
between public charter schools and traditional
public schools.
We are not like men; men shake hands with hate
between them all the time and have
public arguments that are an obvious jostling for power and position.
Really shiny things that don't mean anything,
Public Commission, Trybuna Honorowa, Plac Defilad, Muzeum Sztuki Nowoczesnej w Warszawie, Warsaw, PL Ryan Gander, Billboard for Edinburgh: Year 4, Ingleby Gallery, Edinburgh, UK Icarus Falling - An Exhibition Lost, Maison Hermès, Le Forum, Tokyo, JP Meaning... surrounds me now, 1223 Gendaikaiga, Tokyo, JP New Collisions in Culturefield, Johnen Galerie, Berlin, DE Locked Room Scenario, Artangel, London UK Now there's not enough of it to go around, Annet Gelink Gallery, Amsterdam, NL You have my word, Dazaifu Tenmangu, Fukuoka, JP Attempting to remain light on ones feet: Work from Daiwa Collection, Okinawa Prefectural Museum, Okinawa, JP Ftt, Ft, Ftt, Ftt, Ffttt, Ftt, or somewhere
between a modern representation of how a contemporary gesture came into being, an illustration of the physicality of an
argument between Theo and Piet regarding the dynamic aspect of the diagonal line and attempting to produce a chroma - key set for a hundred cinematic scenes, Taro Nasu Gallery, Tokyo, JP
Arguments 2 and 3 are explicitly for a curtailing of debate absolutely, viz. the debate should only be
between the anointed, and that a passive
public only be exposed to its outcome - NOT allowed to take part in it.
And through conversations with others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all kinds of ways that climate change could become a catalyzing force for positive change — how it could be the best
argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving of local economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest in starving
public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back ownership of essential services like energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all of which would help to end grotesque levels of inequality within our nations and
between them.
Furthermore, with regard to the relationship
between the lending right and the right to communication to the
public under Article 3 (1) of Directive 2001/29 the AG dismisses the parties»
arguments that the latter would apply.
First of all, without it being necessary to rule on a potential analogy
between the tendering procedure relevant to the present case and the principles that are applicable in
public procurement... it should be noted that the applicant's
argument concerning that potential analogy is based on the fact that, at the end of the tendering procedure, no bid or no appropriate bid had been submitted.
@Upnorth The line
between a «
public» and a «non-
public» performance can be fuzzy and overlaps with «fair use» and not «fair use»
arguments.
Noting that «there is no reason why the fact that the applicant has a private interest in the outcome should be fatal, provided that the
public interest test is satisfied», Jackson LJ's initial report identifies the apparent contradiction
between the «no private interest» test and the requirement in claims involving human rights
arguments for the claimant to have been «personally or directly affected» by the violation.
For Auld LJ, there were two «knock - out»
arguments against a narrowing of the prohibition: - the impossibility of identifying a boundary
between party political matters and other matters of
public importance and controversy; and - he contended, it would not have been «a principled or logical distinction to limit the prohibition to... election periods,» if airtime could be bought outside them (para 80).
However, that
argument is far from the truth as there is overwhelming evidence to support the fact that when the government agencies do it right, then this choice
between private and
public insurance is really a no - brainer.
We attorneys were hired specifically to focus on reaching an amicable settlement in private offices; we both agreed that we would not inflame the situation by «building a case» against the other party and bringing
arguments between the clients into the
public courtroom.