[1] Public confidence in the judiciary is essential in maintaining the rule of law and preserving the strength of our democratic institutions.
In a statement, he said, «Any effort to link judicial campaign contributions received by a judicial campaign committee for major media advertising to case outcomes is misleading and
erodes public confidence in the judiciary.»
Given the important purpose of the judicial discipline process, the critical role of integrity in
ensuring public confidence in the judiciary, and the need to ensure fairness to Justice Girouard, the Ministers agree that the best course of action is to jointly request, pursuant to s. 63 (1) of the Judges Act, that an inquiry be held into the findings of the majority of the Inquiry Committee that prompted it to recommend his removal.»
In Loughry v. Tennant et al., the West Virginia Supreme Court recognized that judicial elections are different from executive and legislative elections, and concluded that there are unique and compelling state interests in «protecting the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary, and
strengthening public confidence in the judiciary.»
«We appreciate the judge recognizes her conduct was wanting and that she recognizes delays in the issuances of judgments absent very good reasons has a real negative effect
on public confidence in the judiciary.
Gray says she's pleased the committee was able to «hone in on what is really at issue, which is
the public confidence in the judiciary system and that his behaviour was of such a profound nature that no matter whether or not he is sincerely apologetic for what he said or that he did seek out additional education, it just can't undo what is already a mistrust in the judiciary for sexual assault victims.»
Speaking in favour of deletion, Lord Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions identified three clear dangers in proceeding, none of which have been addressed by the Lords amendments, to
public confidence in the judiciary, to fairness and to justice (Cols 1898 — 1900).
Several other states conduct official performance evaluations of judges for the purpose of facilitating judicial self - improvement, informing re-selection decisions, and promoting
public confidence in the judiciary.
Tayler said McLachlin's statements to the media after the issue arose «were consistent with international standards and within the scope and role of her office in defending
the public confidence in the judiciary in light of the allegations she had been informed were then being made public, i.e. alleging that she had lobbied against a particular nominee.»
Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges.
The council found Camp failed to meet these high standards and «seriously undermined»
public confidence in the judiciary.