Not exact matches
«My view is that the
public consensus has shifted, and politicians
at the national level are lagging behind,» says Vancouver lawyer Geoff Plant, a former B.C. attorney - general.
The Washington Post reported Thursday that PropOrNot and the nonpartisan Foreign Policy Research Institute both attribute the flood of so - called fake news, or hoax and misleading headlines, during the 2016 election to an elaborate Russian propaganda campaign aimed
at sowing distrust in the American political system and undermining
public consensus.
But when you ask what to do about it, that
consensus quickly devolves into finger - pointing —
at recycling companies like Waste Management for failing to innovate,
at the American
public for their lazy recycling habits,
at producers for creating plastic packaging that is increasingly difficult to recycle, and even
at the federal government for not passing strong legislation that encourages better practices.
By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of
consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive
public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the
public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.
Whatever is distinctive about Judaism has been left out of account either because it does not accord with the liberal
consensus or because Jews lack a
public philosophy of adequate complexity to mediate the values of their tradition to the culture
at large.
You'll get
consensus public sports betting trends on the number and the percentage of bets and the percentage of money placed.Our data comes from real wagers placed
at the industry's largest and most trusted sports books.
NFL bettors who take advantage of sportsbook shading should be able to find even more value employing this strategy
at public books as they typically shade even further off the market
consensus.
Sports Insights betting trends data is taken from real bets placed by the
public at actual sportsbooks, unlike other sites who can only provide betting
consensus data.
Look also
at the commentators themselves — when was the last time you heard someone utter a phrase that seriously questioned the narrow
consensus that passes for
public discourse in this country?
The idea is to try and build
consensus and get input from reformers before the governor goes
public with his reform agenda
at the State of the State / budget address on Jan. 13th.
«There was a strong
consensus from the Meeting that it would be better to take some of the heat out of this
public debate; this would entail taking forward a calmer internal party review of funding which would be more comprehensive and balanced (including importantly, addressing the Conservative multi-million pound donations
at and between elections) and putting that forward as part of Labour's manifesto offer for party funding reforms.»
The chairman said that election would take place even where there is
consensus among contestants, assuring the
public of adequate security personnel
at congress venues.
The Legislature also hasn't come to a
consensus on mayoral control of New York City
public schools, which expires
at the end of the month.
In retrospect historians may look
at the period before the economic crisis hit as one of
consensus politics: where the Conservative opposition stuck to Labour's
public spending plans.
That was the
consensus from nearly 50 residents from East End communities who spoke
at a packed
public meeting Wednesday evening about a record number of aircraft — mostly helicopters — buzzing their homes this summer.
Legislative committees, specifically assigned to various areas, do the research, with assistance from the executive branch, debate often - conflicting points of view
at public sessions, and typically offer
consensus recommendations to the full body.
Supervisor Scott Russell said he believes the commission failed to come to a
consensus and work with the Town Board before voicing their concerns
at the first
public hearing on Jan. 14.
This evening, State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver gave a big boost to the plan, endorsing CB3's guidelines: «I want to commend the leadership and members of the Community Board 3 Land Use, Zoning,
Public and Private Housing Committee for their effort to achieve,
at long last, a true
consensus about the future of Seward Park.
«I want to commend the leadership and members of the Community Board 3 Land Use, Zoning,
Public and Private Housing Committee for their effort to achieve,
at long last, a true
consensus about the future of Seward Park.
«I must however say that, the
public and Civil Society Organisations are disappointed in our inability to pass the Right to Information Bill and are still hopeful that before this Parliament is dissolved
at midnight on the 6th of January, a
consensus can be found to pass this Bill into law,» he expressed.
When the need arises we meet as frequent as we should be meeting and
at such meetings issues of concerns are brought to the fore for discussions,
consensus is built around a lot of issues before they are rolled out to the
public,» said Dzakpasu.
The role of Speaker
at one level is confined to chairing debates in the Commons, but in the current crisis caused by the expenses row, there is a
consensus that the position is more
public and will require driving a reform agenda that sees the executive brought under control.
There is
consensus that if we could better predict who was
at risk for suicide, then we could more effectively intervene to reduce this terrible burden on individuals, families and
public health.
A
consensus among researchers is emerging that these events occur in
public places, include
at least four people killed by gunshots within a 24 - hour period and are not part of a robbery or any other separate crime, Rocque and Duwe say.
And the White House opposes the measure because it «is contrary to the widely - accepted scientific
consensus that GHGs are
at increasingly dangerous concentrations... [and] would strip EPA of its authority to protect the
public from GHG pollution.»
The idea was unusual, maybe even unwise: Bring together people and organizations sometimes
at odds with each other — the teachers union, the School Board, reporters, business leaders — and wrangle them into
consensus and cooperation on challenges facing Madison
public schools.
The general
consensus has been that the new Range Rover wouldn't get a
public debut until the Paris Motor Show in September, but we've heard from a normally very reliable source that Land Rover are planning to make the new Range Rover a star
at Geneva in just a few weeks.
(You would really then need to go on to explain that
consensus does tend to determine correct scientific practice, but explaining the principles of scientific reasoning and research to the
public at large would make science articles about 10 times as long as they currently are.)
Instead, we find the «net being an ever more polarizing influence, and having negative effects on
public policy because it's so much harder to arrive
at a
consensus.
The scientific discussion is misframed in the press, in the
public mind and in the policy sector, as being between the
consensus position and the «skeptics» who are so confident that nothing of consequence is
at stake in anthropogenic climate change that they feel comfortable advocating an essentially trivial policy repsonse to it.
It was aimed more
at reinforcing the resolve of the majority in the
public and the policy - making community who, betting on the scientific
consensus, are ready to move forward with a serious approach to dealing with the problem but are being slowed down by the ill - founded skepticism of a minority.
«The reason «
consensus» has not appeared to work in society
at large to date isn't because it's ineffective — it's because there is a well - funded countermovement out there that takes every opportunity to mislead the
public into thinking that there isn't a
consensus,» Lewandowsky told me, in response to this argument.
The fact, for instance, that Nicolaus Copernicus failed to win a
public consensus during his lifetime did not alter the reality of his postulations that the Earth was not
at the centre of the universe.
This brief history, as well as some «on the street» interviews with the
public about what percentage of climate scientists they think agree on the cause of climate change, are described by Cook in a short video while his post
at the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists also discusses some motives for attacking the
consensus.
At a time when the U.S. and the world's nations are trying to put together an agreement to tackle climate change (for better or for worse), Steyn's book reminds everyone of Climategate, why the
public doesn't trust climate scientists and aren't buying their «
consensus»... I hope that everyone will learn that adversarial science as practiced in its pathological form by Michael Mann doesn't «pay» in the long run.
In the U.S. anyways, who (individual organization) has been most effective
at challenging the IPCC
consensus science in the
public debate on climate change?
«who (individual organization) has been most effective
at challenging the IPCC
consensus science in the
public debate on climate change?»
But that's I think because the
public is uninformed about specifics, and even when an equally carefully worded phrase is used, where 98 % of scientists know it's not
consensus, the same 50/50 split among the
public will come up, and all that means is they don't know scientific language and the specifics of the issue well and otherwise it says a lot less than you might think
at first glance it says.
To review:
At first sight, Pope's article appears to be a refreshing call for intellectual honesty from the
consensus climate - science camp: «Hey, why don't we try telling the
public the truth, for a change, instead of all this exaggerated alarmism?»
For instance, my recent post
at the Nottingham University's Making Science
Public blog, drew attention from the 97 % - ers, not because they wanted to take issue with the argument, but because they wanted to sustain the notion of
consensus according to their form of environmentalism.
They were
at last willing to engage with the
public about the scientific
consensus that our rapid consumption of carbon is causing the world to heat up faster than is good for the human species.
... the individual specialist knows nothing (or nothing much) about most of it... to the extent that
consensus exists
at all, it is simply a
public expression of faith in the profession.
So while there appears to be a robust political
consensus around the importance of climate change, it is a silent
consensus — which from the point of view of
public engagement, may as well not be a
consensus at all.
He is the person who got into bed with Mr. Littlemore's boss
at a PR [
public relations] company, a Mr. James Haugen (LOVELY IMAGERY HERE, VISCOUNT; JOHN AND JIM WENT TO HIGH SCHOOL TOGETHER), and they took up the DeSmog Blog, whose job of course is not to debate the science of climate, but to inaccurately misrepresent the alleged or supposed or imagined funding of anyone who dares to challenge the supposed
consensus on the climate (INACCURATELY MISREPRESENT THE ALLEGED OR SUPPOSED OR IMAGINED FUNDING??? YET MONCKTON DOES N'T DENY HIS OWN CONNECTION TO A SPPINSTITUTE CREATED BY EXXON MOBIL.
Claims that a scientific
consensus on climate doesn't exist despite multiple studies or even cursory looks
at the literature, or that expert opinions are meaningless, are really just efforts in denial, and attempts to halt reality - driven
public policies.
As explained in this piece, the graphics of the pie charts showing actual expert
consensus or expert vs
public consensus are great
at showing these things.
Empirical studies aimed
at trying to make sense of this phenomenon have concluded that the reason the
public remains divided on «scientific
consensus» isn't that they haven't been exposed to evidence on the matter but rather that when they are exposed to evidence of what experts believe they selectively credit or discredit it in patterns that reflect and reinforce their perception that scientific
consensus is consistent with the position that predominates in their cultural or ideological group.
Typically, a theory either rises to the level of
consensus or it is abandoned, though it may take considerable time for the scientific community to accept a theory, and even longer for the
public at large.
Once the fat - is - bad theory became the
consensus — and was being formally promoted in federal agencies» recommendations to the
public — the officials handing out money were much more interested in finding evidence about the evils of fat than in looking
at alternative hypotheses (like the carbs - are - bad theory discussed by Mr. Taubes).
The truth about Judith Curry, as I see it, is that she has a strong attraction for political dialogue, and refuses to see that the
public debate over climate is fundamentally
at odds with good science, as is the IPCC - sponsored «
consensus» of climate alarmism, or in her case, of climate political - worryism (she seems deeply attached to helping bring about «reasonable» and «responsible» climate policies — whereas my view is that any and all such climate policies, now, are necessarily based upon incompetent, false science, are entirely the wrong thing to try to impose upon the people of the world, and need to be summarily thrown out, before one can even begin to have a dispassionate, competent scientific dialogue — as opposed to the political debate now being served up — on the state of climate science.).