They did so on a novel legal theory that centered on treating private schools like public schools for disability law purposes because private schools receive
public dollars via a state - funded voucher.
Not exact matches
That's exactly what's at the heart of this — that the use of
public funds (e.g., tax
dollars) should NOT be used to promote (e.g., force down the throat of others) any particular religion or religious belief or practice — that money shouldn't be taken by non-Christians by force (
via taxation) and then given to Christians to put up displays of Christian religious symbolism.
The
public,
via taxation, provides billions of
dollars for climate research.
Policymakers to invest
public dollars in innovation - seeking entrepreneurs, deliberately authorizing for innovation and enabling more rapid innovation
via «micro-charters.»
If we really must spend tax
dollars, lets do it at the R&D; level and make the findings available to all
via public domain licensing.
Transactions in the new digital currency would be open to everyone
via a
public ledger in a local currency such as the
dollar or euro.
The lawyers involved need to consider the actual, real - life likely outcomes of «all» of the potential scenarios that «can» be produced by a tribunal's decision, and decide which «one» would realistically provide the best outcome for the consuming real estate
public, and not just for a particular dissaffected former Realtor claiming to be acting as a reasonable facsimile of a modern day Robin Hood (my interpretation of Dale's apparent claim to have spent years studying ways and means to provide real estate services equal to or superior to current standards
via CREA's operations at much less cost to consumers), all the while projecting profits of hundreds of millions of
dollars (it's 50/50 that «Robin Hood» is a myth).