Federal health information regulators recently clarified that HIPAA permits certain uses and disclosures for
public health activities without patient authorization.
Not exact matches
The regulations are meant to provide federal protection and to reassure the
public that their
health and research information are safe, but at the same time the proposal also calls for the exchange of data
without patient consent for «national priority
activities» — which include research.
According to a 2010 study in the American Journal of
Public Health, children with dogs spent more time doing moderate to vigorous physical
activity than children
without dogs.
Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected
health information about an individual
without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other
public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected
health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement
activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.
We permit disclosure of protected
health information to law enforcement officials
without authorization in some situations precisely because of the importance of these
activities to
public safety.