Democrats, Meyer is saying, can win if they exaggerate and pander to
public ignorance on issues like health care and global warming, but once elected and their «solutions» to the fake problems are put on the table, they immediately start to lose public support.
Not exact matches
I don't know what it is that compels these people to put their
ignorance and gullibility
on public display like that.
On Tuesday, January 17th, former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich said that the only way he would ever support a Muslim for the presidency of the United States is if that person would «commit in public to give up sharia» thereby continuing his trend to exhibit his ignorance on the subject of Islamic law (sharia) as well as his ignorance of the United States Constitutio
On Tuesday, January 17th, former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich said that the only way he would ever support a Muslim for the presidency of the United States is if that person would «commit in
public to give up sharia» thereby continuing his trend to exhibit his
ignorance on the subject of Islamic law (sharia) as well as his ignorance of the United States Constitutio
on the subject of Islamic law (sharia) as well as his
ignorance of the United States Constitution.
But Judge Posner incisively points out that «
public support for the [partial - birth abortion bans] was [in part] based...
on sheer
ignorance of the medical realities of late - term abortion.
The truth is that both this cynicism and the naive faith it shatters are based
on ignorance about
public matters that a healthy republic can hardly afford.
No skin off our backs if others continue to enjoy committing
public suicide
on the hills of
ignorance.
«My mission in
public life which has always cantered
on transforming the material conditions of our people has always revolved around these three imperatives — breaking the yoke of
ignorance that keeps our people down; liberating them from ill - health and other limitations that restrain them from achieving their potentials; and breaking the stranglehold of poverty which keeps people from living full creative lives.
Tuberculosis remains a stubborn foe despite the efforts of the
public and private sector's efforts to deploy new antibiotics and diagnostic tools against a disease that thrives
on poverty and
ignorance
«WE DO N'T benefit from
ignorance,» Barack Obama said last week after ending a de facto freeze
on US government research into the
public - health impact of guns.
It's an industry which has made a killing
on the
ignorance of the general
public.
Does
ignorance about these factual matters bear
on public attitudes toward school spending?
Part of the explanation for this is the widespread
ignorance on the part of the general
public about just how much already is spent
on public schools.
School / districts can only do so much to fight the willful
ignorance of a
public who think they must be entertained but will not make an effort
on their own, refuse to read and whose attention span is limited to 7 - 15 minutes.
Jesus just look at Brexit, the level of
ignorance by the UK
public on what that will actually mean for them and the rest of the world is staggering.
Quite frankly if the credit bureaus have 79 % errors, according to the US
Public Interest Research Group, and that only 11 % of those people with errors dispute those facts and only 5 % of those ever challenge the results of the investigation the credit bureaus are banking, LITERALLY banking
on the average consumers
ignorance trying to get through the credit repair maze.
He has argued that failed banks should not be bailed out, Lehman's collapse was not a disaster, AIG should be declared bankrupt, that naked short selling is not a problem, that backdating isn't so bad, insider trading should be legal, many corporate CEOs are underpaid, global solutions are worse than local solutions, Warren Buffett is overrated, Michael Milken is a great American, the collapse of the hedge fund was not a scandal, hedge funds are over-regulated, education is overrated by the educated, bonuses at successful Wall Street's firms are deserved and possibly undersized, management buyouts are boons to the economy, Enron's management was victimized by an over-zealous prosecution, Sarbanes - Oxley should be repealed, corporate compliance culture is a disaster, shareholder democracy is overrated, hostile takeovers ought to be revived, the market is permanently moving away from
public ownership of equity in corporations, private partnerships are
on the rise,
public ignorance is encouraged and manipulated by governments and corporations, experts overrate expertise, regulatory agencies are controlled by the businesses they supposedly regulate and Wall Street is much more fun than people give it credit for.
Both the deceitful and the ignorant, though, prey
on the
ignorance of the
public — as long as people don't know the truth about these exotic - sounding dogs, they'll continue to buy them and support this unethical and unnecessary practice.
«By camouflaging their true agenda and encouraging the
public to confuse animals rights philosophy with the
public's own belief in principles of animal welfare, they have organized a powerful, highly sophisticated, media - savvy international movement designed to cash in
on the fear, concern and
ignorance people have regarding animals and animal issues,» says Patti Strand, AKC Board Member and executive director of the National Animal Interest Alliance (NAIA), an animal welfare organization that supports responsible use of animals and works to protect our rights to own and breed dogs.
What do you hope to gain by
public demonstrations of your
ignorance on this site?
I'd object that
public ignorance that there is a scientific consensus
on many aspects of global warming is a proper subject of agnotology, and that no theory of this
ignorance can ignore the active efforts of those sort - of - knowledgeable deniers.
If someone holds extreme or bizarre or clearly baseless opinions, or receives funding directly or indirectly from corporations with billions of dollars in profit riding
on public confusion about, or
ignorance of, the scientific facts, or «chooses to spend his time» with propagandists and ideologues known to be dishonest, those are all entirely legitimate — and indeed compelling — reasons to be, shall we say, «skeptical» of his scientific claims.
I was at a dinner a couple weeks back at which several journalists spoke
on just this issue, and Shankar Vedantam and Chris Mooney made a good case for what I have also suggested (including in my reply to you
on April 6); What's really irrational is for smart people, in support of the myth of perfect rationality and frustrated by the
public's «
ignorance» about risk, to ignore the mountains of evidence from neuroscience and social sciences about how human perception and decision - making actually works, about risk or anything else.
On the denialist side of this debate we have factual misrepresentation, resolute ignorance (or the feigning of it), fabricated controversies intended to distract the public, and a fixation on personalities and politic
On the denialist side of this debate we have factual misrepresentation, resolute
ignorance (or the feigning of it), fabricated controversies intended to distract the
public, and a fixation
on personalities and politic
on personalities and politics.
All we need to do is look at the polls of where the
public stands, and at the polls that reveal the scientific
ignorance underlying widespread
public opinion, to see that the impact of the unsound science
on the skeptics» side is significant.
This is merely your outcry to the
public and looking for support, hoping that you can spread your
ignorance to them, and instill unsupported fear, rather than focusing
on the science and trying to falsify it.
Scientists must account for general
public ignorance; not prey
on it as has been done with this AGW hypothesis based
on the fraudulent misrepresentation of the effect from greenhouse gases.
They worked hard instead to scare the
public by preying
on their
ignorance.
TV reporters and anchors produce reports and documentaries that are based
on their personal
ignorance, where their
ignorance is then transferred to the
public at large.
In my future research, I plan to build
on my PhD study to further investigate how economic interests use think tanks, the news media, social media and social movements to engage in the social production of scientific
ignorance in order to manipulate policy debates in the areas of environment, energy and
public health.
This a global conspiracy of smart issue based lobbyists making a fast regressive buck, based
on the guesses of climate scientists, fraudulently linked to a regressive set of over subsidised solutions that actually make net grid sourced ACO2 emissions worse, exploiting the abject
ignorance of the
public and their politicians for a faster buck than doing the right thing.
... Media Charlatans... TV reporters and anchors produce reports and documentaries that are based
on their personal
ignorance, where their
ignorance is then transferred to the
public at large.
After all these years wouldn't one perhaps wonder why CREA (the industry mother ship) has not produced a boatload of buyer agency ads or actual training for the
public, specifically, for the real estate law firms, and last but certainly not least, for the press who insists
on declaring that only «sellers» pay the commission, creating misrepresentation by their comments and articles, either intentionally or out of genuine
ignorance.
In every single market there are agents losing business b / c of the
ignorance of the general
public on how much money is involved.