Sentences with phrase «public misunderstanding on»
Paul, for clarification of my comment (15) on before G.W. Bush took office in 2001,... I meant as a whole (5,000 managers and staff) that NWS contributed in large ways to public misunderstanding on climate change and global warming, not necessarily 5,000 individuals.
http://www.realclimate.org/ Not exact matches
The apparent misunderstanding arose after Anthony House, a public policy and communications senior manager at Google, spoke of testing an anti-radicalization program at a hearing before the United Kingdom's parliament on Tuesday.
The bottom line is that the American public is being fed a carefully crafted mythology (no doubt «market tested» on «response groups» to see which images fly best) to mislead the American public into misunderstanding the nature of today's financial problem — to mislead it in such a way that today's policies will make sense and gain voter support.
«We do not therefore accept the Department's submissions on the likelihood of the public misunderstanding the disputed information, or being misled as to its significance by the media.
On Wednesday, Bloomberg described the police stopping and handcuffing of the councilmember, Juamaane Williams, and Kirsten John Foy, an aide to Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, as probably «just a misunderstanding.»
Barry coined the term «brainscams» in a 1990 article to draw attention to popular efforts to capitalize on the public's misunderstanding of the brain.
Speaking at a seminar on public confidence in biomedical science at the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Prof Wilmut warned there was a danger in missing scientific opportunities because of public fears and misunderstandings.
Why does the public have a generally accurate understanding of school performance but a gross misunderstanding of the amount that is spent on education?
Just weeks ago, Carmen Fariña, the new chancellor of the New York City Public Schools, displayed her own misunderstanding of the role that knowledge plays in education: «It's always been something I've believed in — we learn facts maybe to take tests, but we learn thinking to get on in life.»
The article also says that «opinion with respect to the Common Core has yet to coalesce,» and then kindly suggests to Core supporters that they «probably need to clarify their intentions to the public if they are to keep their support from slipping,» as if the opposition is based on a particular set of misunderstandings.
Once again, the poll sheds light on the public's understanding (or misunderstanding) of school financing.
I agree with Olson, utterly, that there's not enough experimentation, too much fear of failure and also far too much fear and misunderstanding at scientific institutions, from America's universities to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, about the obligation and responsibility to engage the public in a sustained way.
Much of the public's misunderstanding of human - induced global warming centers on storm surges and sea levels, and yet this has hardly been the central focus of climate science research over the past 20 years.
There is currently widespread public misunderstanding about the degree of scientific consensus on human - caused climate change, both in the US as well as internationally.
While not inclined to disagree too strenuously with the bulk of the post, I think the second - to - last paragraph commits the same analytical errors which lie behind the failure of public image - enhancement campaigns — both are predicated on a misunderstanding of why lawyers are not well - liked.
The public debate at the time was more focused on whether this meant that judges in general are tired of smartphone patent suits, and there was a fundamental misunderstanding on the part of all those who thought the cancelation of the Chicago trial was a loss only for Apple, when in reality the FRAND - related part of Judge Posner's ruling — which I called «absolutely fantastic» in the analysis I just linked to — was a major victory for Apple (more important than the negative part for Apple in my view).
The result was a public debate based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the ruling.
In a statement on Monday, Case blamed criticism on the public's «misunderstanding of technology.»
Not that Samsung needs my assistance, by any stretch of the imagination, but I feel like there is still some misunderstanding in the public about what goes on in a Samsung device.