Sentences with phrase «public money does»

It's a bit worrying if the man in overall charge of spending public money doesn't appear to have read the Auditor's report.

This is what public money does to people.

-- How much public money did the B.C. Liberal government waste on designing the pro-HST pamphlets before backing down on their plans?

But in Johnson's view, private schools that take public money do not have the same legal obligations to children with disabilities as public schools.

Ahh yes, we have to save that public money don't we?

Not exact matches

Becoming SOX 404 compliant costs real money, and private companies don't generally go down this road unless they prepare to go public.

Becoming a JP and / or notary public does not cost much money.

However, according to Bloomberg, Spotify «could create a new model for growth companies in which they raise all their money in private markets and do all their trading in public ones, with some small variations.»

«You're going to need to know how to be scrappy, and you don't want to be learning after you've raised a bunch of money or when you're public,» he says.

A solution he considers is «Pour massive amounts of public money into energy R&D and infrastructure buildout,» which sounds great, but how exactly do you do it?

These employees and investors have stock in a company that they can tell is doing well, and they want to sell it to the public and make a lot of money.

To figure out what that would do, the ISP tracked what 92 public companies that already pay the 20 % rate (or less) did with their money from 2008 to 2016.

Zuckerberg and Sandberg have been happy to amass great wealth and power relying upon other people's money and the public's trust, but they do not want to be accountable to those who supply the needed resources.

Spotify didn't need to raise money, but it did need to go public to satisfy its stakeholders and avoid paying out chunks of equity that diluted its shares.

Facebook paid its IPO underwriters to do one job, and one job only: Generate the most money possible through the initial public offering of Facebook stock.

«As technology jumps forward and people are changing preferences we have to think long and hard about what the public sector offers to people when it comes to money and how do we facilitate people living in society getting access to money in the forms and shapes they prefer them to be,» Skingsley said.

«In troubled times like these, public companies turn to the private - equity markets because they don't have the same financing opportunities that they might otherwise possess, either by selling more stock in the secondary markets or by borrowing whatever money they need from banks,» he says.

Twitter (twtr) was losing money when it went public in 2013, and it has kept right on doing so.

There are lots of dumb things you could do as a startup entrepreneur — like base your company out of Bakersfield, allow yourself to be acquired by Groupon in an all - stock transition, or pitch your growing U.S. - based startup to the Samwer brothers — but nothing could be more dumb than throwing your hard - earned venture capital money at a public relations firm.

By allowing certain stock to have more voting power than other stock our company takes our public shareholder money but does not let us have an equal voice in our company's management.

We haven't even touched upon how many people can save a ton of money going to a public school like I did or attend community college for two years and then transfer to a public school for even more savings.

Most of these deals go through a privatized economic development agency called JobsOhio, which doesn't require as much transparency as a public agency about what taxpayers are getting for their money.

Add the fact that, according to Kingsdale, just one in three activist endeavours ever become public, and the trend is clear: dissidents know battles cost money, the loser loses big, and the winner doesn't even come out unscathed.

Not only did that hammer industry profits, but it also slashed the amount of money flowing into public coffers in Alberta and Ottawa.

««Virtual currencies» means a digital representation of value that is neither issued by a central bank or a public authority, not attached to a legally established currency, which does not possess the legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange or for other purposes, and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically.

Jabbour's big public success so far is winning back some money for Metro do Porto for their terrible snowball trades (including with Goldman 1).

Even if youdo raise money and sell a company or take it public, your median time to doing that is probably 49 months.

I've done thought experiments where the central bank stops injecting base money through bond purchases, and begins paying public sector salaries with new base money (cash).

For people living in rural areas, where wait times for driverless Uber or any kind of public transit are completely unreasonable, yet don't have money to burn an extra $ 10k on their car to make it autonomous, will continue to buy old - fashioned human - driven cars with gas pedals and steering wheels long into the future — and will not accept not being able to drive their cars into cities.

«A broad coalition of investors wants companies to tell stockholders and the public more about so - called «dark money» spent both in campaigns and on lobbying by groups that use corporate money and don't say where it comes from,» Welsh of Si2 said.

Earlier comments by international lenders that Greece must shrink its public sector spending to avoid running out of money within weeks did not dampen the sudden enthusiasm for stocks over here.

In his first public response to questions about the payment, the president said he did not know where his attorney, Michael Cohen, got the money, and he declined to say if he ever set up a fund for Mr Cohen to cover such expenses.

Do you want to make money buying IPO stocks before they go public?

GORDON T LONG: Right now I am pretty well restricted to my work because I am retired, I'm an investor, I just manage my own money and I do this work to really narrow in on where my investing should be, but I publish and put all of this at www.matasii.com and there's a subscription service for it depending on what kind of detail you want to go down to, but a lot of it is right out on a public page.

That cash doesn't include the money PhRMA's spending on the ongoing «Go Boldly» campaign, a series of TV, print and radio ads designed to polish the drug industry's image by reminding the public that drug companies do world - class research that brings disease cures to market to save lives.

For the first time, it's about the principal and not the money; churches don't need to use public spaces for their nonsense.

And why do they insist on using public money for their private purposes?

And Socrates» paradoxical statement in Plato's Apology that «not out of money does virtue arise, but out of virtue money and all other goods for human beings, both private and public» - a passage that has given modern scholars fits for generations - underscores the self - sufficiency of the virtuous individual.

Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.

When you've made money on a public persona that involves discrediting Christianity, you don't get to Christians out on stuff.

Though churches are entitled, unlike other private employers, to hire with their own money their own members in preference to others, they are not entitled to do so with the public's money.

Well, if they paid taxes and stopped receiving public money they could do what they like.

The point is is that it IS wrong to force someone not to talk about their god, but that it is ALSO wrong to take money from someone who doesn't believe in that god by force (e.g., taxation) and then turn around and give that money to someone who does to promote their views about that religion (such as funding a memorial with public funds).

I don't really have a dog in this fight, but the point is that it shouldn't be paid for with public money unless you are going to be buying burkhas and yarmulkes and buddhas as well.

I don't see entertainers as idols, but people who became celebriites because people paid money to be entertained, but no person in my eyes has God - like status, because of money, fame, possessions, and alot of PR (public relations).

First, accepting public money to perform a government - desired service does not make a private agency part of the government.

Whether they do it consciously or not, groups like the Anti-Defamation League seem to argue from the presumption that any public money passing through religious agency hands is somehow rendered «baptized» and therefore unable to serve the common good.

When she enters the public realm, she does so as a political actor — writing letters, signing petitions, donating money.

I don't really care whether you believe public monies are prohibited from being used for abortion.

It wouldn't matter that they think the world is 6000 years old if they didn't demand that we teach that nonsense in public schools, with public money.