Sentences with phrase «public opinion changes»

And this argument is a bit a straw man, as if anyone was arguing that (consensus) communication is the only way public opinion changes?

Politicians also have responsibility to act if the public opinion changes.

Will there be other effects not presently expected, including a quick reversal or slowdown of policy changes because of public opinion changes and future electoral losses?

Our methods can be employed to evaluate the responses in other countries and reapplied in the future to measure how public opinion changes as these potential new technologies are discussed and developed,» he said.

Unless public opinion changed drastically by the time of the referendum the Devo - Max option would have been a clear winner if it had been included.

I can understand the scores for GTA IV and Skyward Sword, even if the public opinion changed around it afterwards.

Finally, to its credit, this lengthy, propaganda - spiked article does contain one nugget of (almost) serious analysis worthy of further discussion — there has, sadly, been an upturn of public opinion change in the UK in recent years towards the denialist camp.

But now that the scientific consensus is out there, do you see public opinion changing?

Not exact matches

By keeping your finger on the pulse of public opinion, you can change your business to ensure that you are not sabotaging your formal marketing campaigns.

While it's still unclear if Session's views will translate into changes in policy or enforcement, this attitude shift at the federal level doesn't align with public opinion on the issue.

Rosenberg and the DEA seem wedded to this position despite pushback by scientists and changing public opinion.

Hoping to change public opinion, artist Daan Roosegaarde created an art piece, Windlicht, that links wind turbines using green lasers and tracking software.

As data accumulates, Morning Consult can to identify small changes in public opinion and parse responses across narrow demographic attributes like employment status, prior voting activity, or religious affiliation.

Acosta, in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, which was also shared with Reuters, said there was «no principled legal basis to change the June 9 date while we seek public input.»

Survey shows majority support for an effective climate plan and minimum carbon price, even if some provinces disagree OTTAWA — New public opinion research shows that two - thirds of Canadians believe it is more important to have a plan to meet Canada's climate change targets than to have all provincial and territorial premiers agree with that...

The organization's mission is to strengthen the wealth - creating capacity of its members and promote economic development; to create innovative and effective change in the business culture; to build strategic alliances, coalitions and affiliations; and to transform public policy and influence opinion makers.

The rules will be open for public opinion next month which could possibly bring in some changes before they are implemented.

A new public opinion survey from the Angus Reid Institute — conducted in partnership with MARU / Matchbox — canvassing both entrepreneurs and Canadians who don't own businesses finds two - in - five small business owners saying their organizations would be negatively affected by the proposed passive investment changes.

In this regard, public opinion polls have shown that Canadian support for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and his message of change is extremely high.

Writing in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, Acosta said that «we have carefully considered the record in this case, and the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, and have found no principled legal basis to change the June 9 date while we seek public input.»

This sentiment represents a sea change in public opinion.

The progress of algorithms has gone so far that Facebook and Google are now accused of creating filter bubbles that can effect public opinion, rapidly change political landscapes and sway elections.

The National Survey of Canadian Public Opinion on Climate Change was designed by Erick Lachapelle (Université de Montréal), Chris Borick (Muhlenberg College) and Barry Rabe (University of Michigan).

Gallup shows that public opinion has not shifted with recent policy changes on same - sex relations or doctor - assisted suicide.

It is a tactic and they have used it successfully to change public opinion, and I think not for the better.

While public opinion has (thankfully) changed, the right of a clergy member to refuse to marry an interracial couple hasn't.

The past decade has seen a rapid transformation in public opinion and legal norms around sexuality, same - sex marriage, transgender rights, and religion in the public square — changes that have caused anxiety for a great number of traditional religious believers, including Christians, Muslims, and Orthodox Jews.

Since public opinion, or world opinion, or the opinion of governments in general has become a powerful factor in the situation, and since the West must depend very much on capturing the opinion and the sympathy of what might be called the uncommitted powers, our future is going to depend on the kind of internationalism which does not attempt to freeze the existing situation in a legalistic manner but takes the lead in predicting and preparing the necessary changes in the status quo.

Public opinion on same sex marriage and unions in the United States thus reveals a great deal of change in a short period of time and significant regional disparity.

But their involvement often comes in light of changing public opinion.

«The public forum in which information and opinions are exchanged is not something static... it is the sum of various «worlds»,» and he reminds us: «Vatican II considers the awareness of this changing world as fundamental for understanding our task.»

It will not change anything as far as public opinion and I hope they uphold prop 8 and Doma.

Not only does Bob not seem to understand the courts» duties, but he seems to ignore that public opinion on this issue is in fact changing more rapidly day by day.

The major newspapers and public radio rejoice at how easy it turns out to be to change public opinion on an issue that many had feared would be fraught with conflict for years to come.

If the World Trade Organization penalized countries that imposed such a tariff, its nature would be exposed, and public opinion, acting through governments, might yet reduce its power or change its policies.

It would be useful to debate the vision of politics according to which facts must become law — that is, that the law must change as soon as polls reveal that a majority of the public favors an opinion.

All them Northerners keep saying I can't keep slaves and saying how public opinion is changing towards owning humans, but they can all just go with the flow if they like, i'll be staying alive swimming against the current for as long as my racist arms will carry me...

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

Giroud has changed the public opinion of how Arsenal attack, that is a really bad CF to make the neutrals think ARSENAL is the reason for the slow attack!

Sirs: As a club of true hot rodders we Road Gents have been trying to change public opinion about hot rodding through courtesy and assistance on the road.

Despite rapidly changing public opinions about cannabis, the current political climate is likely to pause any further liberalization in how leagues approach the substance.

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

In a 21st century world where advances and developments in technology are changing rapidly each day, how we use social media outlets such as Facebook, Twitter and MySpace has come to reflect the state of public opinion on countless issues in our society.

This might change public opinion in these countries about wasting money on vanity projects like PSG and Manchester City.

Flash forward several months, and public opinion about both teams has changed dramatically.

When we wrote this article last week the Over was juiced up to -140, but since then public opinion has changed and the Under is now juiced up to -245 from -145.

There are those concerned that votes changing because of public opinion is a bad thing, but this isn't writers being bullied.

I also know wenger does not criticize his players in public and giroud has done well in some ways this season BUT strikers must score goals and frankly he has not scored enough, the fact that we are top of the league has really hidden this issue BUT it remains and if things go south the opinion will change really quickly, good luck to him though.

«My bias has not changed, but in the interests of patients, I need to see past my own opinions and look at the whole picture of the appropriate blend of science, good practice, and the viewpoints of the general public that will inevitably steer their rehabilitation in a good or bad direction.»

Public opinion toward child care time largely reflects these changes.