They have been implemented in a cloak and dagger way which suggests ministers are well aware they would spark
public outrage if they were properly understood.
The vulnerability is common, and it will cause other service - based companies to walk the plank of
public outrage if it is not properly understood and contained.
Not exact matches
If these efforts at refunds are tried, a) there will be
public outrage and heat on the government, and b) others will sue.
«Being truthful, even
if it makes one look bad, is the quickest way to reduce the length of time spent by media covering an issue or the length of
public outrage exhibited on social media.
Most of time, you'll only see slight growth, but
if you happen to catch a wave of
public indignation you might see a massive spurt of signups — I heard a presentation in 2005 from a group that had gone from zero to over 100,000 names in just a few months (
if I remember right) because of
outrage over gay marriage (they were on the let - us - marry - dammit side).
You probably wouldn't need it
if they post all expenses online - it would basically outsource scrutiny to an
outraged public.
«
If you also are
outraged by a new chancellor without any experience in
public education and who sent her own children to private school, here is an online petition you can sign and forward on,» wrote one parent on an education e-mail list.
Even
if Labour scored a decent second in the popular vote, installing a new prime minister no one had voted for would surely cause
public outrage — leaving only the still implausible prime ministerial option of Clegg himself.
Perhaps
public outrage wouldn't be so high
if the nation was seeing real results.
If (the
public) understood what was happening with education to their children, there would be an
outrage in this city.
«
If any suggestion was made that unqualified doctors were let loose on patients there would be
public outrage.»
The Baltimore City school administrators who never raised a cent on their own and could never claim «I built that» even
if it came to a teachers» lounge, recently wasted over $ 500,000 in
public funds (that's taxpayer money) on expensive local hotel suites, lavish dinners and even wings at Hooters for students «because that was what they wanted,» and The Sun was so
outraged by their indefensible waste of taxpayer money that it was called a «distraction» in an editorial.
If Apple had silently decided to stop providing security updates for nearly 1B of their users, the
public outrage would be hard to ignore.
If the true and staggering cost of subsidised wind and solar power were
public knowledge, there would be
public outrage.
If they did, they'd join religious groups in expressing outrage every time Planned Parenthood or other pro-abortion mouthpiece calls an unborn child (fetus, if you prefer) «a blob of tissue» or tries to prevent the biology of human prenatal development from being taught in public school
If they did, they'd join religious groups in expressing
outrage every time Planned Parenthood or other pro-abortion mouthpiece calls an unborn child (fetus,
if you prefer) «a blob of tissue» or tries to prevent the biology of human prenatal development from being taught in public school
if you prefer) «a blob of tissue» or tries to prevent the biology of human prenatal development from being taught in
public schools.
If we found dogs and horses with their legs severed, bleeding and dying, the
public outrage would be deafening.
With these criticisms in mind, the latest in a long line of cases, R v Hamilton [2007] EWCA Crim 2026, [2007] All ER (D) 99 (Aug), merits consideration to determine what light it throws,
if any, on the elements of the offence of
outraging public decency.
It was contended on behalf of the appellant that the law relating to the offence of
outraging public decency had developed in such a way that the offence was confined to those instances where the necessary lewd act had been witnessed by at least one person, and the
public nature of the offence was only satisfied
if, in addition, at least one other person either had or could have seen the act.
If we consider the biggest security risk for any law firm is the people they employ; along with the handful of high - profile cases that have the potential to become the focus of
public outrage — it's not inconceivable that lawyer - client communications will be at greater risk.
When,
if ever, will we see similar
public statements of «
outrage» (media releases and the like) from any of the spectrum of lawyers» associations when the «victim» is a non-lawyer.
HELD In order to prove an offence of
outraging public decency the prosecution had to show that: (i) that the act was of such a lewd, obscene or disgusting character that it
outraged public decency; and (ii) that the act took place in a
public place and that it was capable of being seen by two or more persons present even
if they had not actually seen it.
Furthermore, the offence of
outraging public decency does not fall under the sex offenders» notification requirements, while a voyeur convicted under section 67 can be made subject to notification
if the sentence passed is over a certain threshold or
if the victim is under 18.
If the
public is not
outraged, the government does not have to act.
The
public element in the offence was satisfied
if the act was done where people were present and the nature of what was being done was capable of being seen; the principle was that the
public were to be protected from obscene or disgusting acts which were of a nature that
outraged public decency and which were capable of being seen in
public.
The two person rule in respect of establishing the
public element of the offence of
outraging public decency contrary to the common law can be satisfied
if there were two or more people present who were capable of seeing the nature of the act, even
if they did not actually see it.
Those cases established that
if the offence of
outraging public decency was to be proved, it was necessary to prove two elements: first, that the act was of such a lewd character as to
outrage public decency; that element constituted the nature of the act which had to be proved before the offence could be established.
If the FTC ultimately decides Facebook did violate the agreement, the company could be open to millions in fines, according to the Post — not to mention even more
public outrage for violating the landmark privacy deal.
What
if the shift to an inequitable two - tier health system in Australia generated a level of
public outrage similar to that seen when news broke about cricket cheating?
It would be an
outrage if any other rural or remote town had to sign an agreement with the government before
public health authorities would evaluate disease control and environmental health standards.
If the
public isn't
outraged then we don't need it.
Only elected members of parliament / elected members of provincial legislatures «might» be motivated to take this issue on «
if» enough
public outrage demanded action.
So far, the
public is simply apathetic about this issue, across the board, and only
if a unitary member of the
public is negatively affected by the behavior of a Realtor from time to time (
if he / she even realizes that a dirty deed or an incompetent deed has been committed against him / her) does a lonely voice of
outrage cry out for justice.
If filling in a blank with a number and inserting a few boiler plate clauses into a contract is all that is required by an Agent in «representing» their client's best interest, then the
public has a right to be
outraged at the fees we demand.