SAN JOSE, California — Most scientists support engagement in
public policy debates related to science and technology, and many believe that engaging with the public and news media can advance their careers, according to a new survey.
Not exact matches
In the face of these challenges in
public understanding, the new report released at the AAAS meeting showed that 87 percent of scientists say they should take an active role in
public policy debates about issues
related to science and technology.
But while science advances through that process of argument,
public attitudes on climate change have largely been dulled by the
debate, particularly after more than a decade of industry - backed efforts to point to the implicit complexity in the science as a reason for inaction on
related energy and climate
policies.
It has not only distorted our
public and
policy debates on issues
related to energy, greenhouse gas emissions and the environment, it also has inhibited the scientific and
policy discussions that we need to have about our climate future.»
As part of a series of the workshops called Taking Stock, the Earth Journalism Network worked with journalists from 13 EU countries to improve their understanding and coverage of issues and reforms to lead to more informed
public debate related to the Common Fisheries
Policy.
2.10.2 Intellectual freedom includes: (a) the rights of all Staff to express opinions about the operation of the University and higher education
policy more generally; (b) the rights of Staff to pursue critical open enquiry and to discuss freely, teach, assess, develop curricula, publish and research within the limits of their professional competence and professional standards; (c) the right to participate in
public debates and express opinions about issues and ideas
related to their discipline area; (d) the right of all Staff to participate in professional and representative bodies and to engage in community service without fear of harassment, intimidation or unfair treatment; and (e) the right to express unpopular or controversial views, although this does not mean the right to vilify, harass or intimidate.
It has not only distorted our
public and
policy debates on issues
related to energy, greenhouse - gas emissions and the environment.