Sentences with phrase «public policy disagreements»

Since becoming speaker 12 months ago, Heastie has had few public policy disagreements with Cuomo, save for the tug - of - war over education reform measures in last year's budget.

The primary way to have a public policy disagreement in the Albany culture is to attack people personally, and ask them to smear each other,» the mayor said.

Not exact matches

At one time governments, both Liberal and Conservative, asked their public servants to provide their best advice, regardless of disagreement, wanted policy options costed, and were even willing to publish reports and analysis and defend them in public.

The fourth fact about the Catholic Church is that there are many points of disagreement on social policy among Catholics; there is no one Catholic line on most public issues.

In Clegg's characterisation of not making public disagreements as the pukka thing to do, for example, he seems oblivious to how Lib Dems are going to campaign against those policies that they do disagree with when they have been silent on them for five years.

Lansbury resigned as leader in 1935 after public disagreements over foreign policy.

Miner is a former state Democratic Committee co-chair who departed the role after a public disagreement with Gov. Andrew Cuomo over local government policy.

While the annual spending document has long produced disagreements over taxes, school aid and hospital reimbursement rates, fights about other public policies — often with minimal fiscal impacts — have now become flash points and stumbling blocks.

The pair continue to have public disagreements on policy that are unusual for two leading officials in the same party.

«I chose not to speak publicly about these disagreements, however, because I feel my responsibility as CEO of Success Academy is not to advance my personal beliefs on a broad range of political issues but instead to focus all of my energies on advocating for our kids and public policies that expand educational opportunity and parent choice,» she wrote.

There have been, are, and will be disagreements between myself and the incumbent over matters of public policy.

Sensing the groundswell of opposition, the state superintendent of public instruction, Jack O'Connell, announced his disagreement with the decision and promised that the state's policies would not change.

I've only read a subset of a subset of the papers and am not qualified to comment on much of the science, but where there is so much disagreement, from well qualified people on all sides, then there is obviously a problem in applying any of it to public policy.

The issue for me was that a cryosphere scientist was taking meaningless statistics at face value, though was taking a stand in a public disagreement superficially about a BBC programme, but in reality a broader debate about policy.

To name a few: Dr Nina Pierpont, USA, author of «The Wind Farm Syndrome»; Dr Sarah Laurie, Australia, Medical Director of the Waubra Foundation; Dr Bob Thorne, Australia, Psychoacoustician; and Dr Carl Phillips, a Harvard - trained epidemiologist specializing in public health policy, formerly tenured professor in the School of Public Health, University of Alberta, who wrote about governments denying the health problem: «The attempts to deny the evidence can not be seen as honest scientific disagreement and represent either gross incompetence or intentional bias.&public health policy, formerly tenured professor in the School of Public Health, University of Alberta, who wrote about governments denying the health problem: «The attempts to deny the evidence can not be seen as honest scientific disagreement and represent either gross incompetence or intentional bias.&Public Health, University of Alberta, who wrote about governments denying the health problem: «The attempts to deny the evidence can not be seen as honest scientific disagreement and represent either gross incompetence or intentional bias.»

It is, unfortunately, sometimes difficult to discern the difference between these concepts and a simple disagreement by the judiciary with the public policy decisions of democratically elected officials.

Justice Slatter's dismissal of this jurisprudence as «a simple disagreement by the judiciary with the public policy decisions of democratically elected officials» looks not unlike the expression of a simple disagreement by one judge with the constitutional policy decisions of his hierarchical superiors.

On one hand, it is very easy for disagreements to get out of hand in the public realm, quickly degenerating into the ugliest forms of lateral violence, where we attack the person, not the policy.