Sentences with phrase «public policy rationale»

«Employing a liberalized model would allow the profession to uphold the public policy rationale underlying regulation while welcoming the investment and capital that spurs innovation, allows for global competition, enhances efficiencies, and facilitates new ways of serving clients,» the report states.

Simply put, this is a terribly regressive policy lacking in any sensible public policy rationale.

In our view, the Government and HMRC really need to make it clear what the public policy rationale is for the corporate evasion criminal offence in light of the recent ministerial statement.

Not exact matches

Weiner laid out the rationale for his mayoral candidacy in a DN OpEd, and also said: «(I) f some citizens want to ask me questions about my private failings rather than public policy, I understand.»

Last week the St. Louis Post-Dispatch featured a warning about the proposed deal (details of which have yet to see the light of public day) by In the Public Interest's Donald Cohen, who explained why «there is no clear fiscal or policy rationale for the privatization of the airport.&public day) by In the Public Interest's Donald Cohen, who explained why «there is no clear fiscal or policy rationale for the privatization of the airport.&Public Interest's Donald Cohen, who explained why «there is no clear fiscal or policy rationale for the privatization of the airport.»

Do you think religious rationales should be used in forming public policy today?

The rationale underlying the defense is one of public policy: «The law ought to promote the achievement of higher values at the expense of lesser values, and sometimes the greater good for society will be accomplished by violating the literal language of the law.»

Issue Spot anticipates and articulates the principled rationale for our public policy positions.»

Car insurance premiums are an important public policy consideration, even in light of the compensatory rationale underlined in tort law.

And finally, the access to information is connected with the concept of democracy and supports two important principles: 1) public right to administrative information, a cornerstone of our democratic system, and 2) the absolute transparency and accountability in the administration (decision - making process and policy rationales) governing the public interest.

Though the public policy behind statutes of repose is based on the policy judgment that a potential defendant should have no reasonable expectation of responsibility for injuries that occur after the passage of a number of years, the Court held that such a policy rationale does not apply to asbestos cases because: (1) the potential dangers associated with asbestos exposure were well known by 1971; and (2) the typical latency period from asbestos exposure to disease is much longer than the six - year window for filing personal injury claims under the statute of repose.

It was accepted that the orders had implemented the first defendant lord chancellor's prior policy decision (the decision) that the principle of «full cost recovery» in setting court fees (the principle) should be applied to public law family proceedings; that the rationale for the decision had been a wish to fix fees at a level which reflected the true cost to the courts services and to replace the then extant model which involved heavy subsidisation; and that s 92 of the Courts Act 2003 (CA 2003) was relevant insofar as it empowered the lord chancellor to prescribe court fees by order, and that it set out obligations to «consult» specified judicial persons, the Civil Justice Council in civil proceedings, and «persons likely to have to pay [fees]», prior to the making of any orders.

On the issue of «science» in general, many MHPs (the author believes Gould as well) hold personal biases in favor of joint custody (with or without rationales such as «as a default starting point» or «because it appears to be public policy» etc.).