Sentences with phrase «public poll so»

It's the first and only public poll so far not to show Spitzer in the lead.

Not exact matches

«Understanding who you are polling, understanding what the map looks like, what the electorate looks like is so important, and that's why so much of the public polling was off,» he continued.

Also, solicit your feedback through private surveys or polls instead of public ones, so that the community isn't swayed by the vocal minority.

A 2012 Gallup poll found that only 5 percent of US adults identify as vegetarians (down from 6 percent in 1999 and 2001), so the ability to convince the public that vegan products can be as flavorful as meat ones is an important sell.

Some politicians find polling to be a little old fashioned, so they're using big data to see what the public thinks about them.

Even so, recent polls suggest opposition among the general public has softened lately.

Results of the Monmouth University Poll also indicate there are potential hurdles for selling this proposal to the American public since most feel the middle class has not been seeing any benefits from Pres. Donald Trump's policies so far.

Christian Aid has taken a stand after a new ComRes poll found that 80 per cent of public agree it is morally wrong for banks to profit from investments that pollute the environment, while 77 per cent believe banks should be stopped from doing so.

Oregon is currently ranked # 1 in both polls, so it's not surprising to see the betting public all over the Ducks.

You can share your poll just with friends and family, or make it public so other BabyCenter members can vote.

Rejecting the advice of «so - called communications experts» that the broadcasts are «quaint» and a «relic of the past», he cited a 2005 ICM poll which found party political broadcasts are second only to news bulletins as the lead source of information for general members of the public.

He asserted that, Mr. Anyidoho simply flew off the handle and run amok, launching blistering verbal attacks on anyone he perceived to be anti-government, and so wondered why he's suddenly gone on hibernation from the public view just a week after the general polls.

Do they really think the public will go into the polling booth thinking «oh well I would vote for Labour but they can't be trusted on the economy, and I would vote for the Conservatives but they might deliver the wrong kind of recovery, so I think I will marry economic efficiency and social justice and vote for the Liberal Democrats instead»?

However, the poll suggests that the public are not so keen to listen and would flock to support the Lib Dems if Blair returned leaving Labour on 36 %, the Conservatives on 34 % and the Lib Dems on 15 %.

As an example, the last mayor of a nearby town foresaw the problems that «enforcing» changes to the town's main street (1 less car way, and more parking space), would cause to his reputation, so he made public, electronic poll (with voting stations on public spaces) on that district (and lost).

In doing so, we did find a statistically significant positive correlation between performance and voting intention as measured by Public Policy Polling data around the same time.

Consequently, the possibility to nowcast a campaign, that is, to track trends in real time and capture (eventual) sudden changes (so called «momentum») in public opinion faster than is possible through traditional polls (for example, the results of a TV debate), becomes a reality.

Opinion polls show that a significant majority of the public do not want to see Trident replaced, so cancelling plans for new nuclear weapons would be a vote - winner.

The so - called «polling miss» of 2015 incited a large - scale public debate and led to an official polling inquiry which was tasked to identify the causes of the erroneous predictions.

As a result of this failure to «predict» the result, the Market Research Society held an inquiry into the reasons why the polls had been so much at variance with actual public opinion.

A new poll by the Committee on Standards in Public Life has revealed that four in ten people are so disillusioned from politics that they might not vote at the next general election and that under 30's are particularly disenchanted.

The graph below shows the public's net expectations for the economy in 6 months time, from TNS's monthly survey for Nationwide (in blue), compared to Labour's average lead in the polls over the last 18 months or so (in red).

The Tory leader watched Cowell explain his idea on Newsnight, for «some kind of referendum - type TV show where you can speak on both sides and then open it up to the public to get an instant poll», although Cameron was a bit more wary of the suggestion that Cowell would plonk a red telephone on stage so that No 10 could ring in to make its case.

So it's not surprising that yesterday's ComRes poll for the Mail showed 64 % of the public think the Government doesn't understand the problems faced by ordinary families.

It's hard to tell, but the one public poll issued so far (a New York Times / NY1 / Siena College Poll released on May 21st), gave Rangel a 41 % -32 % edge over Espaillat with Walrond trailing at 6 % and Garcia at 5 % (MOE + / - 3.8poll issued so far (a New York Times / NY1 / Siena College Poll released on May 21st), gave Rangel a 41 % -32 % edge over Espaillat with Walrond trailing at 6 % and Garcia at 5 % (MOE + / - 3.8Poll released on May 21st), gave Rangel a 41 % -32 % edge over Espaillat with Walrond trailing at 6 % and Garcia at 5 % (MOE + / - 3.8 %).

Yesterday's speech was light on new policy, so we must assume the point was to send a message: that despite growing public scepticism — a recent YouGov poll found 78 % of people thinking it «unlikely Cameron will deliver his immigration promises» — he remains personally committed to doing so.

So far, public polling hasn't suggested de Blasio is in too much electoral danger.

In particular the Survation poll had Jeremy Corbyn ahead among the public after they were shown video clips, so was taken as a sign that he may not be as damaging electorally as the commentariat widely assume.

So after two weeks of public humiliation, she's no worse off in the polls than she was before the scandal broke.

«That the Parliament looks critically at the results of a new poll on support for nuclear weapons in Scotland commissioned by Lord Ashcroft; believes that the result stating that 51 % of Scots want the Trident nuclear deterrent to be replaced is misguidedly being used to suggest that a majority of Scots support keeping nuclear weapons in Scotland; understands that the results of this poll were intended to challenge the findings of a recent poll commissioned by the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament that showed a decisive 75 % majority of the Scottish public is against both the cost and the reasoning behind the UK Government's intention to keep all of its nuclear weapons stationed in Scotland; understands that, while Lord Ashcroft conducted the poll to supposedly show that «more than half of Scots are in favour of nuclear weapons», the poll showed that only 37 % of Scots believe so in principle, compared with 48 % who do not; questions the integrity of a poll that, it understands, was privately paid for by a wealthy Tory backer; considers that Lord Ashcroft is spinning the results, and believes that he should stop doing so and accept what it considers the fact proven time and again that Scots want rid of nuclear weapons.»

Blunt timed his resignation so that it became public after the polls closed but before the results were declared.

«I'm not so sure Gov. Christie would want to be hanging out with Gov. Cuomo,» Astorino said in Kingston, citing Cuomo's 42 percent favorable rating in this week's Marist College poll and the federal inquiry into his handling of the Moreland Commission to Investigate Public Corruption.

Americans are increasingly confident in the news media and less so in Trump's administration after a tumultuous year in U.S. politics that tested the public's trust in both institutions, according to a Reuters / Ipsos opinion poll.

A new ComRes poll for The Sunday People reveals that most of the British public want David Cameron to delay the so - called «bedroom tax» due to come into force in April.

It could, of course, simply be that public opinion has changed — some of Ashcroft's polling was done late last year... but most of the Lib Dem collapse in support came early this Parliament, so this doesn't ring true to me.

Unlike YouGov's poll the public were given the choice of all the candidates, not just those remaining in the race, so this the first time that Cameron has overtaken Ken Clarke in a poll of the general public.

MORI's poll in this morning's Sun was actually conducted on Wednesday, so the question of which of the remaining candidates the public would have preferred to see as leader is already out of date (for what it's worth, the figures were Cameron 33 %, Davis 13 %, Fox 11 %).

I sense you view is the same as Milibands and so does the public which is exactly why the polls show that labour are not trusted with OUR money.

Consistent with their perceptions of public stigma, more than two - thirds of those polled said they definitely or probably would hide a mental health problem from co-workers or classmates, and more than one - third said they would do so from family or friends as well.

«People, particularly the «do less» contingent in the public opinion polls, had begun to question why we were doing these things,» he says, but «there was not a well - formulated alternative to the so - called von Braun paradigm.»

Annie is pining for the day when her real parents, who left her as a baby with a note they'd promise to return, will come back to claim her, but things take a turn in her life first when crusty billionaire Will Stacks (Foxx, Horrible Bosses 2), who is running a losing mayoral campaign, decides to take her in so that he can boost his public image and gain ground in the polls.

Polls show that the public and parents are leery of cyber schools, and this kind of media attention (sure to be mimicked in local papers) will only make them more so.

Even so, educators responding to a Public Agenda poll in 2000 said they would opt for improved working conditions over better pay, by a margin of 3:1.

The news from the Education Next poll had become so bad we were accused of asking an unfriendly voucher question (it referenced the «use» of «government funds to pay the tuition»), so we agreed to split our respondents into two equivalent groups and ask the second group a «friendly» voucher question instead: «A proposal has been made that would give low - income families with children in public schools a wider choice, by allowing them to enroll their children in private schools instead, with government helping to pay the tuition.»

The NORC poll did not report teacher views on these issues, so one can not be sure of the extent to which teachers and the public differed on the key issues at the heart of the Chicago strike.

Public opinion and its drivers could well influence state and national policy under the new administration, so it is worth evaluating what these polls tell us about college - and career - readiness related policies.

The Education Next poll leaders didn't explore why support for charters has dropped so precipitously, though they speculated that a growing public debate about charters, including a call for a freeze on new charter schools by the NAACP, played a role.

That so many adults have faced, are facing, or will face the challenges of obtaining affordable, reliable childcare is probably one reason that national polls routinely find overwhelming public support for increasing federal and state spending on early childhood programs for low - and moderate - income families.

Now that they're more available, polling numbers should be a more regular part of education coverage, along with quotes and anecdotes, so that readers know the general sentiment of the public along with what individuals and advocates have to say.

In a recent poll, 83 % of parents, agreed that in order to ensure DC remains an attractive place for families, that the city needed to both improve quality at DCPS schools and expand the top - performing public charter schools so more parents can choose the school that's best suited for their child.