charitable, religious, civic, community governmental and educational organizations to secure or protect civil rights, civil liberties or
public rights so long as a substantial majority of such services benefit persons of limited means or organizations that serve persons of limited means
Not exact matches
So whether you're devoutly religious, libidinously left, rapaciously
right, or somewhere in between, what you say and do in your
public life matters to your customers and to the people who help make your company what it is.
As a
public company, your board of directors will become much more visible,
so it's even more important to have the
right team.
So the owners of apartment buildings or commercial properties are within their
rights (assuming they've installed these spikes on their own property, and not, say, on a
public sidewalk).
Twitter (twtr) was losing money when it went
public in 2013, and it has kept
right on doing
so.
Right from its opening sentence («One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is
so much bullshit,») the book's message resonated with a
public outraged by a rash of corporate scandals and feeling deceived by the failure of American forces to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
We may disclose personal information if required to do
so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (1) comply with law or comply with legal process served upon us or our agents, representatives and affiliates, (2) protect and defend our
rights or property or those of our users or (3) protect the personal safety of our users or the
public.
Right alongside my admiration for the
public school students who have been
so articulate and
so focused in their advocacy, lies a deep anger and shame for some of the adult behavior on full display: adults creating and perpetuating fake news, doctoring video and pictures; adults pilfering from the holy ground that is the site of a mass killing; and adults attempting to steal the bright shine of these student advocates.
So Europeans and Asians see U.S. companies pumping more and more dollars into their economies, not only to buy their exports in excess of providing them with goods and services in return, and not only to buy their companies and commanding heights of privatized
public enterprises without giving them reciprocal
rights to buy important U.S. companies (remember the U.S. turn - down of Chinas attempt to buy into the U.S. oil distribution business), and not only to buy foreign stocks, bonds and real estate.
Joseph James DeAngelo, 72, who authorities suspect is the
so - called Golden State Killer responsible for at least a dozen murders and 50 rapes in the 1970s and 80s, is accompanied by Sacramento County
Public Defender Diane Howard,
right, as he makes his first appearance, Friday, April 27, 2018, in Sacramento County Superior Court in Sacramento, Calif..
But, he added, «Kyle's old enough to know whether he wants to speak in
public, and he has every
right to do
so.»
In doing
so, they stepped into a long and complicated balancing act in the United States between
public safety and the
right to bear arms for people with mental health issues.
Full employment via
public jobs is a great thing; but, oh, it is
so blatantly obvious that debt - free money creation by the government is absolutely censored on both the
right and the
so - called left to protect the commercial - banking cartel.
You acknowledge, consent and agree that we may access, preserve, and disclose your registration and any other information you provide if required to do
so by law or in a good faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) comply with legal process; (b) enforce this Agreement; (c) respond to claims of a violation of the
rights of third - parties; (d) respond to your requests for customer service; or (e) protect the
rights, property, or personal safety of The Defense Alliance of Minnesota, The Defense Alliance of Minnesota Affiliates, its users and the
public.
The second President, John Adams, favored making available
public land
so that every citizen could be an independent property holder, and wrote the
right to acquire property into the Massachusetts Constitution.
So tell me my good fellow How someone is going to manage the equivalent of an 45 minute drive without a car or access to public transit (that would be about a 30 mile trip, so at least 10» ish hours walking for the average person or 3» ish hours on a bicycle if I recall base speeds correctly right
So tell me my good fellow How someone is going to manage the equivalent of an 45 minute drive without a car or access to
public transit (that would be about a 30 mile trip,
so at least 10» ish hours walking for the average person or 3» ish hours on a bicycle if I recall base speeds correctly right
so at least 10» ish hours walking for the average person or 3» ish hours on a bicycle if I recall base speeds correctly
right)?
Employee stock ownership under ESOPs gives workers confidential voting
rights on major corporate issues,
so that they have some formal corporate governance
rights in closely held corporations, and in stock market companies, employee owners have the same
rights as other
public shareholders.
Of the 52 Facebook comments, the remaining five included one asking whether the clear backpacks were just at Stoneman Douglas or were countywide (Answer: Just Stoneman Douglas); two that weren't understandable; and two that maintained minor students have no
rights in
public school,
so the complaints about the loss of
rights by students were meaningless.
These stories of everyday - people - turned - human -
rights - defenders, most of them Indigenous men and women of Mesoamerica, will undoubtedly provide the Canadian
public with the
so - far untold story about this highly - controversial Canadian economic development model.
The Liberals have been pushing their
right - wing agenda for the past twelve years: privatizing and contracting out, slashing corporate taxes
so they're now the lowest in Canada, dismantling the social safety net and environmental standards regulations in BC, and attacking
public sector workers.
If required to do
so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is appropriate: (a) under applicable law, including laws outside your country of residence; (b) to comply with legal process; (c) to respond to requests from
public and government authorities, including
public and government authorities outside your country of residence; (d) to enforce our terms and conditions; (e) to protect our operations or those of any of our affiliates; (f) to protect our
rights, privacy, safety or property, and / or that of our affiliates, you or others; and (g) to allow us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain.
«
So, we're really happy with where our business is going
right now and it's a great time for us to go
public.»
So here's the rub: If the information is truly material, and the investing
public has a
right to know what a large blockholder's intentions are, why make the
public wait 10 days to find out?
The Christian
Right wants
public money to be used for private religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be used for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks, special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families
so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and
so on.
So basically, they are saying people can not freely practice their religion in
public... something doesn't sound
right about that.
If
so, it is deeply inconsistent for such officials to grant themselves the
right to
public religious legitimation and blessing while denying them to the rest of the population, who seek them at
public occasions meaningful to their own lives.
The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child policy,» replete with forced abortions,
public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here — in fact,
so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human -
rights bureaucracies.
Dimitri Cavalli, source of many WWAI items over the past few years and author of the Washington Examiner story from which these quotes are taken, explains the change this way: Back then, Lynn was defending progressive causes, but now that «the
so - called Religious
Right has eclipsed the influence of the Religious Left in American
public life,» it's time to shut down religious influence.
Sadly when the religious
right pushes
so hard to bring there god into
public settings and schools it becomes necessary to push back.
If you can't name him
right away, check Google... for reliability use Google to find out a report made
public by the Johns Hopkins Universiity Blloomberg School of Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclus
public by the Johns Hopkins Universiity Blloomberg School of
Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclus
Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just
so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler»,
so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclusion...
And if Eisenstadt, Roe, Casey, and Lawrence were the direct descendants of Griswold, it is not difficult to see how Goodridge v. Department of
Public Health, the 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision mandating
so - called «gay marriage,» was a collateral descendant of Justice Douglas» discovery of a constitutional «
right to privacy.»
It is christians who are out attempting to impose their views (ie: denial of gay
rights b / c their book apparently says
so; denial of women's
rights; using the threat of hell; teaching dis - proven creationism to innocent children) on the
public.
So what about my
right to walk around naked on
public sidewalks?
can only occur where there exists some institutional umbrella that can protect human
rights advocates and offer both political and material support for human
rights activities: a church...; a press sufficiently independent
so that it can report information the government would prefer not be made
public and that can offer a forum for some opponents of the government; professional associations, academic and intellectual centers which are financially solvent and not directly controlled by military or government officials.
Moreover, if liberalism is indeed absolute,
so that there is no longer any outside, then a contest of
rights is really the only ground on which liberal
public reason will permit itself to be publicly engaged.
GLBT
rights aside, I get
so tired of the lack of the general
publics logic and critical thinking skills.
Right,
so long as you keep it to yourself, keep it out of official
public ceremonies, keep it otr of football games, keep it out of school — GREAT!!
One reason is that people began to think of retirement funding as a
right and primarily a
public responsibility, and
so — not surprisingly — started saving less.
The fellow who is working
so diligently to determine the
right brand of condoms to be distributed to Washington, D.C.
public school children is not David A. Catalina, it is David A. Catania.
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom
rights,» e. g., the
rights to
public property, free speech, and
so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
So this black person, who represents a group of colored people who were once segregated and considered less than whites, is attempting to rally in other black people to tell the
public they don't consider gay people to have the same
rights as straight people.
The gay
rights movement needs to clean house to win a better
public image of itself
so that people stop contemplating scenarios where their children will be exposed to something as horrifying as some of the messages out there.
The platform planks for «32 embodied a number of Century concerns: U.S. adherence to the World Court protocol; U.S. entry into the League of Nations, provided that its covenant be amended to eliminate military sanctions; U.S. recognition of the Soviet Union (which was granted a year later); the safeguarding of the
rights of conscientious objectors (including those denied citizenship, such as Canadian - born theologian D. C. Macintosh of Yale Divinity School); the abolition of compulsory military training in state - supported educational institutions other than military and naval academies; emergency measures for relief and
public - works employment; the securing of constitutional
rights for minorities; the reduction of gross inequality of income by steeply progressive rates of taxation on large incomes; «progressive socialization of the ownership and control of natural resources,
public utilities and basic industries»; «the nationalization of our entire banking system»; and
so on (June 8, 1932).
But if this be
so we also have the
right to vindicate the sphere of our own freedom, which is not confined to the church building and the sacristy, but which includes also
public and social life.
Yet the basic war / peace confrontation has been given
so little attention that its position within the international law of human
rights has hardly been grasped by the general
public or even by political leaders.
so in that sense he is
right, but he is also very wrong for how he choose to make his issue known to the
public.
They have a
right to organize themselves to work effectively for the good of their country as they understand it, and to attempt to shape
public policy within the limits of the Constitution which has served us
so admirably in avoiding society rendering conflict.
Denying religious groups
public funding is discriminatory, denies the
right to freedom of religion, undermines freedom of speech and belief, and is typical of an ideology of homogenization and socialism
so strongly exposed by the current administration and Democratic party.
«Just as Catholics for a Free Choice and other such groups suggest to the general
public that not all Catholics agree with positions adopted by their bishops on birth control, abortion and in - vitro fertilization,
so will the Religious
Right serve to suggest that not all Catholics accept the positions of church leaders in social justice matters,» writes Richard J. Dowling, executive director of the Maryland Catholic Conference.
This
rights - based ethic is being challenged by the growing recognition among feminists that the notion of «choice» may be a myth; that not only social attitudes but
public policies that promote
so - called «free choice» can be subtly coercive.