DPI deputy state superintendent Mike Thompson acknowledged that it was not the mission of the group that came up with the system — which included union and
public school administrator interests and the governor's office — to make recommendations on how districts should use the results of the system.
Not exact matches
In a posh hotel not far from Central Park, a small group of lobbyists,
administrators, and legislators gathered to consider an
interesting question: Does anybody in the
public schools ever hear the policy debates that rage back and forth at the state level?
It's rarely wise for
administrators (or
school boards, or mayors) to pick unnecessary fights, but it's also unwise to shy away from those that need to be fought through on behalf of the
public interest.
And he answers, «certainly not because I have any direct self -
interest — no... I'm not profiting from my involvement in charter
schools (in fact, I shudder to think of how much it's cost me), and I have little personal experience with the
public school system because I'm doubly lucky: my parents saw that I wasn't being challenged in
public schools, sacrificed (they're teachers / education
administrators), and my last year in
public school was 6th grade; and now, with my own children, I'm one of the lucky few who can afford to buy my children's way out of the NYC
public system [in] which, despite Mayor Bloomberg's and Chancellor Klein's herculean efforts, there are probably fewer than two dozen
schools (out of nearly 1,500) to which I'd send my kids.»
St. Louis has a strong
public school cartel, an alliance of teachers union leaders, central board
administrators, and various
public -
school interest groups that has an established routine for managing the
schools and is typically skeptical of any proposal for change.
Those entrusted with directing our
public schools can bring to bear the creativity of experts, parents,
administrators, and other concerned citizens to find a way to achieve the compelling
interests they face without resorting to widespread governmental allocation of benefits and burdens on the basis of racial classifications.
• Risk underestimated the resistance to change from the organized
interests of the K - 12
public education system, at the center of which were the two big teacher unions as well as
school administrators, colleges of education, state bureaucracies,
school boards, and many others.
The second thing that might be even more
interesting: When revenues were growing in
public schools, they had a preference for non-teaching staff, but when revenues were falling, they actually laid off teachers more than they laid off
administrators and all other staff.
And there is no better way to complete the
public schooling monopoly — to let the teacher unions,
administrator associations, and other adult
interests do one - stop shopping for domination — than to centralize power in one place.
Our campaign includes more than 50 education advocacy organizations plus teachers and
school administrators, representatives of charter
schools and traditional
public schools, urban and rural
interests, business and organized labor, faith - based groups and community groups.
Despite the reluctance of
school administrators to speak up and push back against this ludicrous accountability exercise that has been promoted by politicians and corporate education reformers who have many self -
interested reasons for maintaining this misguided testing endeavor, it is well - known that the «standardized» testing mandate only serves to continue the false narrative of failing American
public education in order to drive the profit - making agenda of those who seek to privatize education and undermine the
public trust.
In June, she convened a diverse group of about 30 participants with strong
interests in gifted kids from all over Minnesota representing parents, legislators,
public and private
school educators and
administrators to work on «New Directions: Gifted Education in Minnesota Vision and Strategic Planning.»
This week's edition is fairly abbreviated, with stories touching upon the challenges that increased pro se litigation create for
public interest advocates and for court
administrators, continued coverage of the debate about the autonomy of
public -
interest clinical programs at state - run law
schools, and more.
In addition to our work within
school districts, Sound Discipline offers workshops and special events which are open to the
public for teachers,
administrators, counselors, paraprofessionals, youth development program providers, parent educators and others who are
interested in Positive Discipline and trauma informed approach to working with children and youth.