Sentences with phrase «public school money because»

When charter schools are funded, there is no overall loss of public school money because charter schools are public schools.

When charter public schools are funded, there is no overall loss of public school money because charter schools are public schools serving public school kids.

Not exact matches

I'm not suggesting blindly spending money just because something is important (as Mark Zuckerberg learned when he invested $ 100 million in the Newark Public Schools).

Bonds get their «tax - free» status because the money raised by the bond issue is usually for a «public good or service» such as schools or roads.

Christians have voted to put their God's name on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.

Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

He doesn't, it's Satan who is running wild in this country because GOD has been taken out of public places and prayer has been taken out of schools etc., when you take GOD out, you let evil in... this nation hasn't learned that yet... there will be more tragedies like this or worse unless GOD is bought back into every facet of the public as he was decades ago when prayer was allowed in school, the commandments were made visible and even on our money his name was present — BRING GOD BACK!!

Deering is a public high school, and Craig was unsure of the best way to get money to provide the sports hijabs as part of the uniforms, because that would mean using taxpayer money for religious garments.

If the American public are led to believe that the reason school food is suffering is because districts are managing their money inefficiently and not because it just costs more, then there will be no call to adequately fund school food.

«I am clear that public money should not be used to support any school or early years provider that does not support this aim because it seeks to promote ideas and teachings than run counter to fundamental British values.»

We need to bring common sense to Common Core because New York is wasting too much time and money stressing children out to prepare for these tests which are of questionable educational value instead of focusing on supporting teachers so they can do their job and teach children what's really important,» said Assemblyman Jim Tedisco, a former public school special education teacher and guidance counselor.

And because money means everything in public education — just ask the advocates — New York's schools must be among America's best.

At the state and local level, these programs tend to be money savers because the average scholarship amount students receive is often considerably less than what is spent on them in total state and local spending in public schools.

Public schools in Cleveland actually have more money per pupil as a result of school vouchers, because they keep money not used to pay for the voucher.

While special education does consume more money over time, the relative financial burden of special education on public education has not increased because public schools are also receiving significantly more money.

They save taxpayers money, because the average voucher ends up costing less than educating the same student in public school and because the voucher curbs public - school financial incentives to inflate the special education rolls.

You must follow basic procurement regulations because your school spends public money.

Second, Don McAdams, founder of the Center for Reform of School Systems, argued that philanthropy typically entails limited dollars in the grand scheme of things, but has an outsized influence because this money is nimble and can be used to drive a state or a district's reforms, where it's hugely difficult to redeploy more than a sliver of public funds.

Critics have long complained that charters don't enroll the most difficult to educate students, and that they drain money from districts because public school dollars move with students to whatever school they attend.

Because public money will directly support the charter schools, and because the results of these schools are of great public importance, it creates a system of public accountaBecause public money will directly support the charter schools, and because the results of these schools are of great public importance, it creates a system of public accountabecause the results of these schools are of great public importance, it creates a system of public accountability.

It turns out that these schools are more effective than the public schools they replace, partly because the teachers in the public schools rarely show up for work and partly because more teachers can be purchased for the same amount of money.

The state teachers union and others oppose them because they hire nonunion employees and divert money from traditional public schools.

You wouldn't ask that question to Centennial High, that they're taking money away from Oñate, because they're all public schools.»

In a blog post, he contended that I - 1240 would be vulnerable to a constitutional challenge because it directed money from the «common school fund» to public charter schools outside the control of the local school board.

We raise money because we believe every child deserves access to a high - quality public school in their neighborhood that prepares them for college.

«Their future is bright because of the quality education they're getting in schools that get less money than the already impoverished Bridgeport public schools,» she said, referencing the event's student speakers.

Because public charter schools» per - pupil funding is often inequitable compared to that of traditional public schools (about 75 - 80 % on average when compared to traditional schools nationwide), virtually all charter schools must use operational funding — money which otherwise would go towards educational purposes and classroom teaching and learning — to cover capital budget shortfalls.

The assertion that charter public schools are opening in locations where there is money available and because of anti-union views is simply false.

The unions must have gotten some money, too, because they also delivered up the «head» of public school education on a platter... It's hard to know why.

The local school board fought them tooth and nail because the charters, of course, would receive school tax money based on how many students they «siphoned off» from the public school system.

She believes public money belongs in public schools, where no child is turned away because the school doesn't have the staff or capacity to support their needs.

To these advocates, the very idea of public oversight of private providers is redundant: market forces will ensure that schools will deliver high quality service because customers — parents just as much as outsourcing public agencies — will otherwise just take their money, and children, elsewhere.

Marion Superior Court Judge Michael Keele decided not to halt the program because arguments against it — namely, the vouchers violate the separation of church and state by using public money to fund religious schools — are unlikely to succeed at trial.

This is important because traditional school vouchers can run afoul of constitutional challenges if they allocate public money to religiously based organizations.

How much more do we take away from our public school systems that are already in trouble with funding because of the promised Lotto money which was just superseded by cuts in other places in the school budget.

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the Colorado higher education grant program against a challenge brought under one of its Blaine Amendments (Article IX, Section 7) because the program benefits students, not their schools, because it is available to private as well as public school students, and because it eliminates any danger of indirectly supporting religious missions by attaching statutory conditions on the use of the money.

The intent here is to make you believe that private online schools and voucher funded schools are public schools just because they get public money.

The South Carolina Supreme Court held that using public money to guarantee student loans for students attending private schools did not violate South Carolina's Blaine Amendment because the program is religiously neutral and supports higher education, not institutions of higher education.

Idaho's Attorney General concluded that a bill to provide tax credits to parents who do not use public schools would likely be constitutional under Idaho's Blaine Amendment because «[t] he credit is not dependent upon payment of money to a sectarian school, and any benefits to parochial schools are tenuous at best.»

The Maryland Court of Appeals held that using public money to provide transportation for children attending private or parochial schools does not violate Maryland's Compelled Support Clause because religious institutions would be aided only incidentally as the by - product of proper legislative action to secure the education of children.

Martin said the growth of publicly funded private charter schools and private school vouchers is also an important issue because those programs divert critical tax money away from public schools, thereby increasing the challenges public schools face in meeting the growing needs of their diverse student bodies.

CHICAGO — Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner said on Monday he intends to block money earmarked for Chicago Public Schools» (CPS) teacher pensions under recent legislation because he feels it is too much of a «bailout» for a badly managed system.

Last summer North Carolina charter school officials put the small suburban school, which got about $ 1.6 million in public money last year, under extra supervision because of state concerns about finances and parent complaints about building safety and school leadership.

The charters will get the money for these programs because they receive the same per student allotment as all traditional public schools, but they will be under no obligation to provide the services.

Johnson's amendment says the provisions that protect students with disabilities from discrimination can not be enforced in private voucher schools because the schools are not public, despite receiving public money in the form of a school voucher.

Democrats oppose the proposal because they say it would hurt the education sector by taking taxpayer money away from already struggling public schools and giving it to private schools.

What California's Schools Can Learn From Chicago's Officials in California are still peddling the idea that the state's public - school system — which receives 40 percent of the general - fund budget, by constitutional edict — is struggling because it lacks money.

Dan Rossmiller, a lobbyist for the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, said his members generally oppose such programs because they send public money to private organizations and companies, and see the proposal as expanding the voucher system.

«We see this as a mechanism that will be used to purchase services from private providers because anybody is entitled to use the services at public schools at no charge so why would you need the scholarship money if you could just go for free in a class at a public school?»

The increase in state funding would not take money away from other public school students, he said, because it would not come out of the $ 9 billion state education budget dictated by the school funding formula.