The majority of
public school parents oppose these strategies, and we know that none of them have worked to improve schools in Chicago or anywhere else in the nation,» said Julie Woestehoff of Chicago's PURE and a co-founder of PAA.
Why
Public School Parents Oppose H.R. 2218 and Our Recommendations for Improving the Charter School Bill A Parents Across America Position Paper on the «Empowering Parents Through Quality Charter Schools Act» July 5, 2011 Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing public school parents from across the United States, opposes the current version of H.R. 2218, the Empowering Parents Through Quality Charter Schools Act, which was recently reported from the House Education and Workforce Committee.
The majority of
public school parents oppose these strategies, and we know that
Fifty - five percent of Americans and 63 percent of
public school parents oppose including student scores on standardized tests as part of teacher evaluations.
Not exact matches
Patrick Roach, deputy general secretary of the teacher's union NASUWT, brands free
schools a costly and unnecessary experiment which will produce misery for children: «We are on the side of
parents and
public who are
opposed to free
schools.
«New York State United Teachers today issued early endorsements to three incumbent state senators who have reliably stood with
parents and educators in fighting for fair and equitable funding while vigorously
opposing the climate of over-testing that is harming students and
public schools,» NYSUT said in a statement.
«The fact that only 16 have been announced in the first instance, only confirms a recent Ipsos MORI poll which showed that 96 % of
parents and the
public oppose the Coalition Government's free
school policy.
PDK (universal vouchers, government funding emphasis): Do you favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense?
I am a principal in Texas of one of the first grade 3 - 6 TEA approved
Public school Virtual Academy - I would like some pointers when discussing accountability with potential
parents who are
opposed to high stakes testing and love our
school this year but would rather their child not participate in the STAAR testing required by TEA.
Strong unions are more successful than weaker ones in
opposing liberal charter legislation, but once a charter law is adopted, it seems that
parents see charters as an avenue for reform in districts where unions have a strong hold on traditional
public schools.
The new question read: «Do you favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense?»
To find out, we at the Harvard Program on Education Policy and Governance have asked nationally representative cross-sections of
parents, teachers, and the general
public (as part of the ninth annual Education Next survey, conducted in May and June of this year) whether they support or
oppose «federal policies that prevent
schools from expelling or suspending black and Hispanic students at higher rates than other students.»
For the past two years, PDK has asked whether respondents «favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense.»
A clear majority (62 %) of
parents said each
public school teacher's impact on test scores should be publicly released, a policy
opposed by a majority of teachers (54 %).
The
public continues to
oppose allowing
parents and students to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense, but with 50 percent
opposed to
public funding of private
school attendance and 44 percent in favor, it is apparent why this is a hotly debated issue.
Thirty - seven percent of respondents support the idea of
public school districts offering
parents the option of sending their child to a single - sex
school, 25 percent
oppose the idea, and the remainder are undecided.
PDK asked a nationally representative sample of the American
public the following question: «Do you favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense?»
Twenty times since 1993, PDK surveys have asked: «Do you favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense?»
Left - wing policy supports neighborhood - based
public schools,
opposes any methods to measure or differentiate the performance of teachers or
schools, and argues instead for alternatives to
school reform like increased anti-poverty spending or urging middle - class
parents to enroll their children in high - poverty
schools.
• «Do you favor or
oppose allowing students and
parents to choose a private
school to attend at
public expense?»
In other words, two - thirds of all
parents, including those who have never made use of a private
school, are not
opposed to the idea of giving families a choice of attending private
school instead of
public school.
Today,
Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing public school parents from across the United States, released a position paper opposing HR 2218, the so - called «Empowering Parents through Quality Charter Schools Act.
Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing
public school parents from across the United States, released a position paper opposing HR 2218, the so - called «Empowering Parents through Quality Charter Schools Act.
parents from across the United States, released a position paper
opposing HR 2218, the so - called «Empowering
Parents through Quality Charter Schools Act.
Parents through Quality Charter
Schools Act.»
Take away the hyperbole and inaccuracies, what Randi Weingarten and Jonah Edelman truly
oppose is giving
parents, especially low - income
parents, the ability to choose something other than their neighborhood traditional
public school.
Those on the left, such as notable historian and
public education advocate Diane Ravitch,
oppose Common Core for its corporate backing and believes that the guidelines essentially set up students to fail, providing another reason for
parents to abandon
public schools for private alternatives
I am amazed that such
public figures would demonize
public education, try to induce guilt - trips on
parents for
opposing school closure, and put forth what is either (at worst) a threat or (at best) really insensitive word choice.
Speakers
opposed to the state's new
public education policies whipped an audience of hundreds into a furor at Comsewogue High
School on March 29, 2014 as Opt - Out supporters, preaching from the stage in the auditorium, vowed to «starve the beast» — calling on parents to have their children skip the rigorous standardized tests and deprive the school system of the data upon which the system de
School on March 29, 2014 as Opt - Out supporters, preaching from the stage in the auditorium, vowed to «starve the beast» — calling on
parents to have their children skip the rigorous standardized tests and deprive the
school system of the data upon which the system de
school system of the data upon which the system depends.
Among
parents with children in
public schools, 63 percent were
opposed to linking teacher evaluations to their students» test scores in a recent Gallup Poll.
Now we have a new poll from the
Public Policy Institute of California asking, «Do you favor or oppose providing parents with tax - funded vouchers to send their children any public, private or parochial school they choose?&
Public Policy Institute of California asking, «Do you favor or
oppose providing
parents with tax - funded vouchers to send their children any
public, private or parochial school they choose?&
public, private or parochial
school they choose?»
When it comes to traditional
public schools, more than three out of every four
parents surveyed said they were
opposed to reducing compensation for teachers or cutting resources for the classroom while increasing spending on charter
schools.
Teachers,
parents, and the general
public have long
opposed private
school tuition vouchers - especially when funds for vouchers compete with funds for overall improvements in America's
public schools.
Charter Advocates
Oppose DeVos's Private
School Agenda realcleareducation.com/2017/03/31/cha…
Schools Shift to Free Public Domain Curricula realcleareducation.com/2017/03/31/sch… White parents still want to live near mostly white schools — and in LA, -L
Schools Shift to Free
Public Domain Curricula realcleareducation.com/2017/03/31/sch… White
parents still want to live near mostly white
schools — and in LA, -L
schools — and in LA, -LSB-...]
The teachers unions
oppose reforms like Vergara, they
oppose free speech lawsuits like Friedrichs vs. the CTA, they
oppose charter
schools, they fight any attempts to invoke the
Parent Trigger Law, and they are continually agitating for more taxes «for the children,» when in reality virtually all new tax revenue for education is poured into the insatiable maw of Wall Street to shore up
public sector pension funds.
Trustees, beholden to teachers and other employee unions
opposed to the
parent reform efforts, never agendized a
public discussion with the Palm Lane
parents to learn why they launched the
school reform movement.
A number of groups are
opposing the bill, however, including California
Parents for
Public Virtual Education, EdVoice and the
School for Integrated Academics and Technologies.
Muldrow said she feels compassion for
parents who consider sending their students to private
schools, but she
opposes public money going to religious
schools.
Teachers» unions have been historically and aggressively
opposed to the
Parent Trigger, which allows
parents to replace a failing
public school with a charter
school.
We
oppose the
Parent Empowerment Act and its bad - faith intentions to privatize our
public schools.
Beyer, a Durham native, has raised three children in the county's
public schools and is a founding member of
Parents Across America, an organization that has
opposed charter
school expansions and called for more accountability of these
schools.
Special interests who
oppose giving
parents a choice have often raised the specter of funding diversions from traditional
schools to create political roadblocks for
public charter
schools.
From
opposing the expansion of high - quality charter
schools and other
school choice options, to its opposition to
Parent Trigger laws and efforts of
Parent Power activists in places such as Connecticut and California, to efforts to eviscerate accountability measures that hold districts and
school operators to heel for serving Black and Brown children well, even to their historic disdain for Black families and condoning of Jim Crow discrimination against Black teachers, both unions have proven no better than outright White Supremacists when it comes to addressing the legacies of bigotry in which American
public education is the nexus.
Since Malloy introduced his «Education Reform» agenda, the charter
school industry and the corporate funded «education reform» advocacy groups have hired dozens of lobbyists and spent nearly $ 7 million, or more, to «persuade» Connecticut officials to adopt policies that are diametrically
opposed to what is in the best interests of Connecticut students,
parents, teachers and
public school system.
In general, would you say you support or
oppose parents having the option to send their children to charter
public schools in Chicago?
Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing public school parents from across the United States, opposes the current version of H.R. 2218, the Empowering Parents Through Quality Charter Schools Act, which was recently reported from the House Education and Workforce Com
Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing
public school parents from across the United States, opposes the current version of H.R. 2218, the Empowering Parents Through Quality Charter Schools Act, which was recently reported from the House Education and Workforce Com
parents from across the United States,
opposes the current version of H.R. 2218, the Empowering
Parents Through Quality Charter Schools Act, which was recently reported from the House Education and Workforce Com
Parents Through Quality Charter
Schools Act, which was recently reported from the House Education and Workforce Committee.
The resolution cited the fact that charter boards accept
public money but lack democratic accountability, that charter
schools are contributing to increased segregation, that punitive disciplinary policies are disproportionately used in charter
schools as well as other practices that violate students» rights, that there is a pattern of fraud of mismanagement in the sector in general, and it then called for opposition to privatization of education,
opposed diversion of funding from
public schools, called for full funding for quality
public education, called for legislation granting
parents access to charter
school boards and to strengthen oversight, called for charter
schools to follow USDOJ and USDOE guidelines on student discipline and to help
parents file complaints when those guidelines are violated,
opposed efforts to weaken oversight, and called for a moratorium on charter
school growth.
60 percent of Americans, 62 percent of
public school parents, and 76 percent of Republicans
oppose having the teachers in their «community use the Common Core State Standards» to guide what they teach (PDK / Gallup 2014, p. 12, table 3).