Not exact matches
You're not going to please everyone but in today's B2C world where people can easily complain about anything they want and make their complaints
public to the world you want to
shoot for an 80 % approval
rating - or four stars on Yelp, whichever makes more sense.
With five more years of austerity to go, let's watch the polls for green
shoots in
public confidence in the economy, as well as movements in
ratings of the competence Osborne and the government.
But because of the small number of mass
public shootings, Duwe calculates annual
rates per 100 million people in the United States.
The average annual
rate of mass
public shootings since 2010 is about 1.44 per 100 million people.
The average annual
rate for 1970 to 1979 reached 0.52, based on 13 mass
public shootings.
Criminologist Grant Duwe has calculated annual
rates of U.S. mass
public shootings per 100 million people since 1915 (data since 1976 are shown).
Virtually no research has examined whether a federal ban on assault weapons from 1994 to 2004 contributed to the relatively low
rate of mass
public shootings during that period.
Using Federal Bureau of Investigation homicide reports, Congressional Research Service data on mass
shootings and online archives of news accounts about multiple murders, Duwe has tracked U.S.
rates of mass
public shootings from 1915 to 2017.
In contrast,
rates were minuscule from 1950 to 1965, when only three mass
public shootings were recorded.
There is no tax break, no welfare reform, no marriage education program, no
public service campaign... that can reduce out - of - wedlock birth
rates and divorce
rates to what they were as recently as when the Everly Brothers beseeched «Little Suzy» to wake up lest their reputations get
shot.
Investment bankers convince their analysts to give their corporate client a «Buy»
rating for a
shot at the next
public offering, often at the expense of the retail client trusting that analyst's report.
He also must be told the possible consequences of the alternative adversarial procedure, i.e., the high costs of the litigation, his paying for his attorney, as well as his wife's, at the possible hourly
rate of $ 250, respectively, the crap -
shoot consequences of a judge deciding equitable distribution, child support and maintenance, the
public fiasco, the continuing anger of his spouse, and the certain detrimental effect an the children, with whom he wants to maintain a relationship.