Sentences with phrase «public side as»

Memoir is the personal side of creative nonfiction but there's a public side as well, often referred to as narrative or literary journalism — or «big idea» stories.

Behind 66 % of spread tickets, Dallas was one of Week 15's most popular public sides as of Sunday morning.

Not exact matches

And, as a side note, as U.S. search and content firm Yahoo looks to unwind its 23 percent ownership stake in Alibaba when Alibaba goes public in September, it could end up competing with Alibaba for companies to acquire as it looks to reinvent itself.

And on the flip side, organizations like Gavi, the massive global public - private vaccine partnership, ensure a certain amount of purchases (albeit for a significantly reduced price) as long as companies commit to providing a reliable stream of treatments.

«On the IPO side, favorable public market conditions and stronger valuations are contributing to better quality IPOs for venture - backed companies as evidenced by the jump in dollars raised on the public markets,» NVCA Head of Research John Taylor said in a statement.

Either we will go public, we will do an offering, we'll do something on the private equity side, or we will use all of our profits or as many as we can in consultation with investors to redistribute them to employees.»

As the ultimate taste test, Uncle Dom invites the public to weigh in on his latest side - hustle, «Just Add Lettuce.»

«After the way he was treated by this president, after some of the names that this president has besmirched his reputation with, just seems in basic fairness he gets to tell his side of the story to the American public, and I hope he'll be as forthcoming as possible.»

In the early days of digital culture, Jaron Lanier helped craft a vision for the internet as public commons where knowledge was available to all — but even then, this vision was haunted by the dark side of how it could turn out.

In its other form, as an open source software, the bitcoin blockchain platform, which serves as a public ledger of all bitcoin transactions, is being used by institutional traders and software developers to transform the operational and transactional sides of the financial industry.

The resulting public discourse has seen furor from many quarters with politicians on both sides of the Atlantic rounding on all parties involved in the allegations with Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg earlier facing two inquisitions from the US lawmakers as a result.

It's never a good idea to criticize a former customer in the public light; however, be sure to explain your side of the story without being defensive (as this will create the feeling that you are trying to compensate for a mistake you made).

In a dichotomous way of looking at the problem, many people either side with private blockchains as useful for industry or public blockchains, like Ethereum and Bitcoin, as being the only innovative technology in this space, often calling private blockchains «distributed ledgers» to differentiate them as, simply, decentralized databases, and not blockchains at all.

The other side of the story is what David Broder aptly characterizes as «public penury.»

For when in summer the peasant's horse stands in the meadow and throws up his head or shakes it, surely no one can know with certainty what that means; or when two of them who throughout their lives have walked side by side pulling in the same yoke are turned out at night, when they approach one another as if in intimacy, when they almost caress each other by movements of the head; or when the free horses neigh to one another so that the woods echo, when they are gathered on the plains in a big herd as if at a public meeting — assume then that they really could make themselves understood to one another.

On the ethical and cultural side, they need to help the public as a whole to understand that the nihilism permeating contemporary life is the inevitable consequence of apostasy.

This public reviling of Tony Jones, et al. puts this blog and TWW on just about the same moral footing as the other side.

In particular, the author of the Fourth Gospel, whose book is to be dated within a few years on either side of A.D. 100, wrote for a public familiar, as he was himself, with much of the best religious thought of the time in non-Christian circles.

«We need to bring back public discussion of AIDS as a «gay» disease, pederasty as [sic] major subculture of male hom.ose.xuality, mental health problems and domestic violence as major problems associated with lesbianism, the increasing recruitment of children into a hom.ose.xual ident.ity through experimentation with «gay» se.x, etc. — all the truths we stopped telling because the other side screamed so loudly about them.»

They surely know about safe sex, for as Magic Johnson and others have pointed out, one of the side benefits of his announcement is the public attention now given to the use of condoms.

Six entries made our final cut: three sermons and speeches, King's most radical book, an astonishing letter he wrote as a college student, and a «eulogy» he delivered for a friend that revealed a side of him the public rarely saw.

As you know, there were a number of intrinsic political issues in play during this period: the tariff, oft overlooked by the politically correct in the continuing effort to locate Southern apologists on the side of pro-slavery, the compact theory, and Nullification, an issue that is again in the public square.

Afraid of being branded as moralists, or even worse, proselytizers, politicians cling to surface arguments that remain in the public's comfort zone, choosing sides in the familiar debates on school prayer, pornography, media immorality and abortion.

I have myself taken part in a demonstration against a public policy that was later described by «the other side» as being violent and hateful, with the intent to intimidate the school board into breaking the law.

These shifts have already taken place to some extent, but as «our side» ceases to feel surrounded by a monolithic «slave world» the public may be ready to accept much greater changes in policy.

Meanwhile, the shrill tones of public intellectuals such as Richard Dawkins and the New Atheists have dominated the conversation from the secular side.

Still, «Muslim and Western publics continue to see relations between them as generally bad, with both sides holding negative stereotypes of the other,» says the center's report on the survey released Thursday.

Political, social, racial and sexual issues have always divided the public, and Christians as participants in culture have habitually chosen sides.

While it may make sense to take a stand against the bigotry by having an imam speak as one among many faiths, we know very well that the public will make fools of themselves and expose the ignorant nature of the other side of the coin.

They are Madisonian pluralists who stress Federalist Paper No. 45 as the preferred side of Madison: «The public good, the real welfare of the great body of the people, is the supreme object to be pursued: and that no form of government whatever has any other value than as it may be fitted for the attainment of this object.»

At several points he touches upon the paradoxes of modern urbanism and the tragic ironies of our cultural attitude toward cities: although we now have more individual freedom, technical ability, and, arguably, social equity, we do not live in places as hospitable to human beings as were our cities of the past; we are pragmatists who build shoddily; our current obsession with historic preservation is the flip side of our utter lack of confidence in our ability to build well; while cultures with shared ascetic ideals and transcendent orientation built great cities and produced great landscapes, modern culture's expressive ideals, dogmatic public secularism, and privatized religiosity produce for us, even with our vast wealth, only private luxury, a spoiled countryside, and a public realm that is both venal and incoherent; above all, we simultaneously idolize nature and ruin it.

And as you say, many «uninformed believers» are going like lambs to the slaughter because only one side of the story is made public.

Many critics seem frustrated by how difficult it is to categorize your works, and yet that seems to be a large part of your appeal to the general public, much as it was for Gershwin with Porgy and Bess or Bernstein with West Side Story.

Campaigners on both side of the GM debate have discovered shared ground in agreeing that, as is currently UK law, all food containing more than 1 \ % GM content - however that can be defined - should be labelled so that the public can decide for themselves.

Later, I went through a rather public breakup, and people within the church constantly asked me what happened — not out of care or concern, it felt, but out of a desire to know the details, to be able to better decide which side to take as our community severed.

Along with serving as a sponsor of her popular exercise program, the two entities are working on a variety of activities designed to reach the general public with the «other side of the carb story.»

Tulsa opened as 19.5 - point favorites at the market - setting Pinnacle sportsbook, and early public betting has been extremely one - sided.

Betting market: As of Sunday morning, the Jets were one of the favorite Week 14 public sides (67 %).

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

Now it looks like this move could finally happen as the 22 year - old has spoken out in public about his desire to leave Wolfsburg and insists that the Bundesliga side agreed that they would enter talks, if an offer from a «top international club» came along.

The Falcons opened at -4, but with Aaron Rodgers as hot as he is, the public has sided with Green Bay all week.

As an added bonus, you can also fade the public, follow the sharp bettors and place yourself on the side of the books.

This same strategy should be implemented during the regular season, as there's no value betting against the public when sharps and squares are on the same side.

Earlier this morning, my co-worker PJ Walsh explained how tonight's showdown between the Cleveland Cavaliers (40 - 46 ATS overall, 19 - 24 ATS as visitors) and Toronto Raptors (47 - 41 ATS overall, 22 - 21 ATS at home) is receiving historically one - sided levels of public betting.

«[Betting has been] largely one - sided action on the Cavs as we have almost 85 percent of the public wagers on the visitors.

As you can see from the line history above, public bettors on FSU +7.5 or +7 were already taking the «sharp» side.

While the current data shows that sharp and public bettors are lining up on different sides, there's still plenty of time for that to change, especially if this line gets to Philadelphia +3 and inspires buyback as limits continue to increase.

As you can see, when the betting public loaded up on one team (which we define as more than 60 % of spread bets), the other side covered the spread in each gamAs you can see, when the betting public loaded up on one team (which we define as more than 60 % of spread bets), the other side covered the spread in each gamas more than 60 % of spread bets), the other side covered the spread in each game.

In the most lopsided - bet games, as determined by «betting percentages,» you want to «Bet Against the Public» and take the same side as the long - term winners: the sportsbooks.

As a result, fading the public is a sound strategy because you are taking advantage of public bias and putting yourself on the side of the books and casinos.