Not exact matches
A Wall Street outsider in every conceivable
way — a
public school grad, a Texan from a visible minority, a woman — Godiwalla contended with more than the usual challenges
when she moved to Manhattan in the»90s and became an analyst in Morgan Stanley's corporate finance group.
But
when that agenda means reneging on the EPA's core mission of protecting
public health to serve corporate interests, it falls
way outside any electoral mandate.
«I saw Gawker pioneer a unique and incredibly damaging
way of getting attention by bullying people, even
when there was no connection with the
public interest.»
These outfits have been largely hoisted on their own financial petards and now they can't figure out a
way to get their deals out the door and sell their story to the
public suckers without the embarrassment of a downward valuation
when the underwriters actually start writing the deal book; and (3) They're already a dead dog, living on borrowed time.
When Johnson defended his administration's response by saying that the American people were told about Russia's involvement, Feinstein replied that it was done so «not sufficiently in any
way, shape, or form» for the
public to know about it.
«I saw Gawker pioneer a unique and incredibly damaging
way of getting attention by bullying people even
when there was no connection with the
public interest,» Thiel said.
But perhaps more important, they underestimate the depth of legitimate debate over the
way even
public - minded MBAs ought to put their values into action
when at work.
Advertising and
public relations can be extremely effective tools
when used properly, but they are, by definition, one -
way forms of communications.
The arrest comes at a national moment
when the
way people of color are treated by police in
public places is under intense scrutiny, following the April 12 arrests of two black men sitting inside a Philadelphia Starbucks on charges that they were trespassing.
(Heffernan touches on the big - picture disservice in the media's insidious practice of narrowing our horizons for profit, rather than expanding them in the
public interest: «[Media companies] know that
when we buy a newspaper or a magazine, we aren't looking for a fight... The search for what is familiar and comfortable underlies our media consumption habits in just the same
way as it makes us yearn for Mom's mac»n' cheese.»)
When asked about the best
way forward for Canada's economy in an Abacus Data
public opinion survey last year, just one - third suggested Canada should prioritize promoting the use of Canada's oil and gas.
It's maybe one reason why people are so easily misled into climate change denial
when there don't seem to be any definitive and reliable sources of data that are open to the
public where information is presented in various different
ways that most ordinary people are interested in.
And
when I speak on this topic in
public I like to remind people that, «
when I raised capital there were no easy
ways to figure out who were the friends of the VC's (let alone who the VC's were in the first place) but in 2009 you have alll the social networking tools: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter or even just plain old Google Search.
Old news, you might say, and no big deal, but remember that these kinds of problems
when they arise tend immediately to be suppressed, and only become
public when there is no
way to prevent information from leaking out.
This has some observers asking if we're not seeing something resembling the 1990s tech bubble,
when valuations ballooned, a few major tech giants led the
way, and companies with no prospects to make money went
public.
A
public debt on its
way to 100 % of GDP within the year — and a total debt many times this
when private debt, pension liabilities and entitlement programs are included.
Sidechains have been viewed as Bitcoin's
way of dealing the altcoin market since 2014,
when a proposal for a two -
way peg between two different blockchains was first proposed in a
public setting.
A major issue with decentralization in
public blockchains, he continued, is that there is no
way to pause or shut down the system
when facing an emergency requiring technological updates.
Anyone on your staff have disgusting
public habits (ex: nail biting, nose picking, wedgie pulling, ear cleaning) that there was no
way to know about
when you hired them?
When the Church (or at least the U.S. bishops conference) pronounces on
public policy specifics» welfare reform, medical delivery systems, or armaments strategy, for examples» the Catholic house divides the other
way.
Similarly,
when public schools treat all student speech the same
way, they neither advance nor inhibit religion.
My point is, and it seems obvious in even my small interaction here, that this format,
when void of interpersonal interaction and with all communication being done in
public, is not the best
way to convey our meaning.
and second, the approach to God by
way of animal offerings had been so central in Judaism that, while the sacrifices were always accompanied by supplications, they had competed with personal prayer, had furnished for many people a
public substitute for it, so that
when the bloody altars were gone a devout rabbi could mingle his exaltation of private communion with the lament «We have nothing to bring but prayer.»
The only exception to this is the use of arms in response to an attack under
way or immediately offered, but even this allowance disappears
when public authority is at hand to combat this evil.
When there is a conflict between superst.ition and
public health, the former must give
way.
I do not «agree to disagree» (i.e., shut up and just let you have your
way)
when it comes to the spending of
public funds on expressions of religious faith.
First, he was engaged upon a broad appeal to the
public, by
way of addresses in synagogues, preaching in the open air, teaching
when he could find an audience willing to listen, and discussion with members of the
public who wished to raise questions.
No Mark not all Atheists feel that
way but most of us do feel that religion in the
public square can be quite damaging especially
when it comes to denying other their equal rights or
when it tries to oppress people.
Maybe it's because I take after him so much temperamentally (bookish hardcore introvert) and theologically (I absorbed a lot of that from his seminary student days
when I was 10 - 13 years old, but I'm more radical in a lot of
ways — for instance, he was a bit of a prude and I know I'm more «morally liberal»), but all that
public heart - on - sleeve stuff just makes my skin crawl.
Do you know any priests and have you talked to them about they
way they are treated
when they are out in
public?
When things didn't go her
way, she did not despair, or write in apocalyptic terms, or withdraw from the
public square, or ignore the power of faith to move mountains.
Observer, I choose not to support society's so - called morality
when it deems moral things like the murder of babies in the womb, sodomy, drunkenness, getting high,
public nudity, po.rnogr.aphy... Yeah, society sure has come a long
way.
At a moment
when civil religious symbols are more and more co-opted by ultraconservatives and the philosophy of liberalism seems less and less adequate as a guide to our
public or private lives, a revival of
public philosophy seems urgently needed.8 One of the tasks of such a revival would be to make the religious aspect of our central tradition understandable in a nonreactionary
way.
In the same
way that the energy industry today is mistakenly identified with «Big Oil» (Exxon, Chevron, et al.),
when it is in fact conducted predominantly by smaller independent companies most readers will have never heard of, modern capitalism is not largely the purview of Apple and Walmart, but rather of small, privately owned businesses with less than one hundred employees providing services or products the
public wants or needs in order to support the families of the owners and provide jobs for their workers.
When you enter the
public square you still allowed to believe in whatever you want, but removal of a certain religions code from the
public square is the American
way to give freedom of and FROM religion and not have to acknowledge that even though you maybe Hindu, if you enter a courthouse you still, for some reason, have to acknowledge the 10 commandments, one of which is that you have to believe there is only one god and its the one from the bible.
When barbecues are open to the public, as at the Atlanta Exposition, an admission fee is naturally charged, and expenses are paid in this way; but when votes are wanted, no charge is made, or, at least, such a trifle only as will serve to keep out the canai
When barbecues are open to the
public, as at the Atlanta Exposition, an admission fee is naturally charged, and expenses are paid in this
way; but
when votes are wanted, no charge is made, or, at least, such a trifle only as will serve to keep out the canai
when votes are wanted, no charge is made, or, at least, such a trifle only as will serve to keep out the canaille.
Too bad NYC has banned bake sales in
public schools, especially
when they can really be a great
way to raise money and get kids and parents into the kitchen.
Where Wenger differs is maybe at the opposite end of spectrum,
when dishing out harsh words or unkind lessons, some managers will go there as a
way of building character or venting frustration, but Wenger is unlikely to do that openly out in
public that's if at all.
When we see the
public all over an underdog, we see that as a great opportunity to go the other
way, especially in college football.
The best we can do is catch a slight glimpse of him as he speeds by us in this life, and hope that he will in some
way help prepare us for the day
when we elect
public officials who wear beanies and have term themes to write.
And
when you consider the side effect it had on Man City's performance
when it was made
public that Pep would take over, you can understand why things are being left until nearer to the end of the season, not that i think it would make much of a difference with the
way our lot are playing, but there you go.
Last season,
when his reduced role in the offense (14.6 points per game) first became a
public issue, he was remarkably even - tempered, and he has been that
way this season, even as the cry for his scalp (so to speak) has grown.
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that
when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz
when arsenal do nt even make the budget
public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our
way
The other
way bettors can easily identify sharp money is by looking for reverse line movement, which is
when a line moves against our
public betting percentages.
One of the best
ways to identify sharp money is by looking for reverse line movement, which is
when the spread moves in the opposite direction of our
public betting trends.
Betting market: The Chargers and Chiefs have both gotten steamed
when they reached +1, revealing that this game is drawing two -
way sharp action with no
public consensus to speak of.
Unders in Conference Finals have been very profitable especially
when the
public tickets are going the other
way.
There's no «right»
way to arrive at a price yet oddsmakers typically have their hands forced to an extent by the market Rather than going rouge, hanging a line at -2.5 for a football game
when other books sit -3 says enough about taking a strong position instead of just using pick and then being shocked
when every
public bettor and professional buries PK.
When watching the games, they paid attention for any injuries or performances that might affect the
way the
public would bet.
I hope there will be more options available
when the time comes in the
way of tax breaks or vouchers for those who decide not to send their kids to
public schools.