An interesting balancing question: should courts
set publication rules for anyone employing their decisions?
Shtaif et al. v. Toronto Life Publishing Co. et al. 2013 ONCA 405 Libel and Slander — Publication — General —
Single publication rule Toronto Life published an article profiling a Canadian businessman, Shnaider, in the June 2008 edition of its «How to Piss Off a Billionaire» magazine.
«The effect of the
multiple publication rule in relation to online material is that each «hit» on a webpage creates a new publication, potentially giving rise to a separate cause of action, should it contain defamatory material,» it said.
Also fortunately for defendant, the decision also includes clarification of the 3rd - party
publication rule in civil vs. criminal trials, with the judge researching and revising his own order such that Mr. Rancourt escapes the serious issue of a contempt of court hearing that was scheduled for September 2014.
At the same time they're in the line of fire from the digital industry because TPs are trying rewrite previously established
digital publication rules.
Limiting their usefulness by subjecting them to the
traditional publication rule would have the effect of seriously restricting the flow of information and, as a result, freedom of expression.
Bringing defamation law in line with the internet age, the New Jersey Supreme Court on Monday held that the single
publication rule applies to a defamatory article posted online, but said significant changes to such a posting restart the statute of limitations.
American law applies its
first publication rule to the Internet as well, so something could be online forever but the person defamed can be statute - barred from any legal remedy.
The Times newspaper took a case to the European Court of Human Rights arguing that the
multiple publication rule was so onerous a burden for newspapers in the internet age that it had a «chilling effect» on their right to free speech, as guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights, which the Court enforces.
The Bill introduces a
single publication rule to prevent repeat actions over the same or similar material by the same publisher — for example, where material is published online — with a one - year limitation period.
At the time, D - Wave did not respond with
any publications ruling out this possibility.
The single
publication rule is an American rule that makes a limitation period for defamation run from the first publication of the defamatory statement.
Excepted from
the publication rule are cases dealing with classified information, state security, adoptions, family disputes, sexual abuse, minors, forced psychological treatment and the disabled.
These cases recognize the importance of achieving a proper balance between protecting an individual's reputation and the foundational role of freedom of expression in the development of democratic institutions and values (Grant, at para. 1; Hill, at para. 101)... Interpreting
the publication rule to exclude mere references not only accords with a more sophisticated appreciation of Charter values, but also with the dramatic transformation in the technology of communications.
TRENTON, N.J. (Legal Newsline)-- The New Jersey Supreme Court has ended a defamation lawsuit by mandating that «the single
publication rule» applies to a article posted online.
Switching to a Single
Publication Rule would not relieve defamed individuals of this valuable protection.
It would also remove some of the potential obstacles presented to defendants by the multiple
publication rule, such as the possibility of having to mount a defence against an old claim,» it said.
«A single
publication rule would provide clarity and prevent the possibility of open - ended liability.
«A possible alternative to the multiple
publication rule would be to adopt a single publication rule,» said the consultation.
«While there would be significant advantages for the defendant, a single
publication rule could restrict the claimant's ability to secure redress, particularly in situations where he or she was unaware of the original publication,» it said.
The Government will also consider an intermediate approach which would keep the multiple
publication rule but allow online archives a special status so that publication in them could not form the basis of action after a year has passed from initial publication.
The consultation recognised, though, that changnig to a single
publication rule could undermine the rights of people who have been defamed.
You might find my paper dealing with the US
no publication rule and related issues of interest: Everything old is new again: the proliferation of case law and whether there is a remedy
The Bill seeks to encourage speedy settlement of disputes, and would address internet publication issues by scrapping the multiple
publication rule.
This week's summaries concern: Barrister and solicitor conflict of interest / Defamation and single
publication rule / CPP disability benefits / HIV and consent to sexual intercourse / Sentencing and time already served: