As experts in their fields the barristers have acted as counsel in notable cases, including R (Oczelik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 260 and McIntosh v McIntosh [2014] EWCA Civ 557, and regularly write
publications on their areas of interest.
We'll present a couple illustrations before we'll get to the actual
publication we hope to discuss — one that compares methodology
of science - based and «science - denying» climate websites but that also touches
on a subject we personally find far more
interesting: what's actually going
on in the Arctic, an
area that is not only experiencing major physical consequences
of climate change, but that is subsequently also set to be a stage for a cascade
of ecological consequences
of this climate change — both in the Arctic tundra biome and in the adjacent Arctic marine ecosystem.