Real science from a false scientist is the inverse of the AGW pattern, in which certain real scientists
publish false science.
Not exact matches
A sweeping new study
published in the journal
Science has found that
false or misleading stories spread faster and farther than the truth on social media.
One study that predicted shortages, written by Richard Atkinson and
published in
Science in 1990, has been repudiated, and is often passed around by postdocs to demonstrate this phenomenon of
false prediction — and, some argue, the cynicism of those who continue to call for expansion despite evidence that today's scientists are widely underemployed.
Psychologist Stephen Lindsay of the University of Victoria in British Columbia
published a study in Psychological
Science in 2004 that demonstrates how pictures enhance the formation of
false memories.
Published in
Science last year their work also overcomes a perennial Etch A Sketch frustration — one
false move, and you must erase the whole darn thing.
According to an investigation into the CJP scandal
published in the internationally circulated weekly
Science, the paper was submitted under
false pretences.
But three species of great apes — chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans — also know when someone holds a
false belief, according to a new study
published today in
Science.
Psychologist Stephen Lindsay of the University of Victoria in British Columbia
published a study in Psychological
Science in March that demonstrates how pictures enhance the formation of
false memories.
We review
published claims associated with our technical areas of research and point out
false or misleading representations of
science to help ensure public and commercial policies are guided by facts based on rigorous scientific exploration.
«Good theory» is still an important requirement of
science, so that should moderate the
publishing of wacko
false positives.
Instead of «
publishing the good
science needed to advance our understanding of climate change,» scientists are left defending their work and debunking
false claims.
With the signature of a former NAS president, and a research paper that appeared to be
published in one of the most prestigious
science journals in the world, many scientists were duped into signing a petition based on a
false impression.
Dr. Ioannidis [«Why Most
Published Research Findings Are
False,» in PLOS Medicine] found that the more popular an idea becomes and the more researchers the idea attracts the worse the resulting
science will be.
IPCC = Ecclesiastical Council ARs = Documents of belief and dogma
Publishing Scientists = Prophets and
false prophets Climate
Science = Church AGW adherents = Laity AGW sceptics = Heathens Climate Scientist's Doubts = Crisis of Faith Climate Scientist who holds a dogma to be
false = Heretic