Local authorities do not
publish systematic data to demonstrate how they are monitoring schools» financial management and that they are intervening where necessary.
Not exact matches
To accurately test the hypothesis of a lower risk of recurrence with HRT, a new study led by investigators at Brigham and Women's Hospital
published in European Urology Focus, performed a
systematic review and meta - analysis, pooling available
data, to assess whether an improved risk of recurrence could be demonstrated using HRT compared with CRT, in addition to assessing the relative impact of these two treatments on bladder and rectal function.
The
systematic review,
published in Obstetrics & Gynecology on Nov. 7, is the first to combine
data from multiple studies on IUDs and cervical cancer.
The study — a
systematic review and meta - analysis of
published data — is the largest to quantify whether e-cigarettes assist smokers in quitting cigarettes.
All
data were reduced using the SOSIE algorithm, which accounts for
systematic biases present in previously
published observations.
The second study (hereafter the «meta - analysis»), by Credé et al., [iii] is a
systematic review of
data from all the
published studies that could be found in which participants who were at least of middle school age and in which correlations were reported or could be calculated between scores on any of Duckworth's grit scales and other variables.
Two reviewers will independently assess the suitability of the preference - based instruments for measuring outcomes in palliative care using the ISOQOL, minimum standards for patient - reported outcome measures (conceptual and measurement model, reliability, content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, interpretability of scores, translation of measure, patient and investigator burden), 43 and the CREATE checklist (descriptive system, health states values, sampling, preference
data collection, study sample, modelling, scoring algorithm).44 The ISOQOL minimum standards were chosen as these standards were developed from a
systematic review of
published and unpublished guidance on patient - reported outcome measures, including the COnsensus - based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).46 To the authors» knowledge, the CREATE checklist is the only
published guidance on what key components should be reported in a valuation study.44 Information on how the contents of the instruments were developed, psychometric properties and valuation will be used to assess the suitability of the instruments for the palliative setting; instruments will be scored on whether the domains or dimensions were developed using input from informal caregivers of people receiving palliative care (yes / no) and whether each of the reporting checklist items has been evaluated for this population (if yes, then a score of one will be allocated) and a total score calculated.
The second study (hereafter the «meta - analysis»), by Credé et al., [iii] is a
systematic review of
data from all the
published studies that could be found in which participants who were at least of middle school age and in which correlations were reported or could be calculated between scores on any of Duckworth's grit scales and other variables.