Sentences with phrase «publish the names because»

«I think it's nonsense,» a respected type 1 researcher told me after insisting that I not publish his name because he knows and respects Wilkin personally.

Not exact matches

In his feature published today on the Canadian - made sports drink Biosteel, John Lorinc recounts how Biosteel — unable to secure endorsements from big - name NHL players because of pre-existing sponsorship deals with giant competitor Gatorade — is making inroads with promising up - and - comers instead:

Like a coward he refuses to look at the camera, has a smug, holier - than - thou expression, hates how he was born so he has mutilated his ears, too lazy to shave and get a real job he makes money from preaching his religious beliefs to others, gets his «opinion» published SOLELY because he steals Stedman Graham's name to try to validate himself.

I should have taken a screen shot to send you — I suspect the overlap happened because no comments had been published yet (I'm on firefox)-- the name / email / website fields were completely covered, but I figured those fields were prepopulated anyway because I've commented here before.

«Fifty years ago, mothers didn't have a choice,» said 92 - year - old La Leche co-founder Edwina Froehlich (the name as published has been corrected in this text), who had her first child at age 35 and was told she wouldn't be able to produce breast milk because she was over 30.

I'd like the paper to publish a little map showing the names and addresses of the armed guards hired to protect against their perceived threats, because in their own words, «readers are understandably interested to know about guns in their neighborhoods»

Even when they publish papers, they are not always required to release the underlying data, but generally they want to wait at least until they get a paper because the currency of scientific research is credit, that is, credit in terms of recognition of your peers, your name on a prestigious scientific paper, that sort of thing.

* If scientists are missing, it is probably because they do not meet the minimum requirements: First, their full names must appear at least 40 times within the data set (representing 4 % of books published between 1800 and 2000).

Eventually those names stuck (although Galileo, not Marius, does get credit for the discovery in today's textbooks, because he published first).

- Dr. Richard Benton, Winner 2009 «This prize is special because the judges care as much about your passion for an interesting problem as the brand name of where you «ve published.

I admit this journal gets a bit of lenience from me because it's the first place where my name appeared on an authorship list in the scientific literature: way back in 2005, when members of the SNP Consortium led by my former P.I., Raymond D. Miller, published a pre-HapMap high - density SNP map of the human genome.

But, quickly, he is seduced by Longo (who claims he took the name because he was a fan) and, more importantly, by Longo's story: He's innocent, with a terrible secret that he will reveal to Finkel on an exclusive basis for a book to be published after his trial.

He is, believe it or not, a high school senior, and he thinks his lab work is pretty cool, especially because his name will appear on any research paper published as a result of these experiments.

A: We do not publish the names of our schools because some schools have asked for confidentiality.

But the real catch is, that more often than not, I choose Indie authors because their stories are often BETTER than well known published, paper - back / hard - cover writers, so there Mr K what's - his - name.

And although a major Hollywood name like Carrey would find it easy to land a mainstream publisher, he said: «I'm going to self - publish, because that's just the world right now and I think it's cool».

I can't pluck out the names of modern self published authors because I don't have the time for any modern works.

I don't think anyone's listed all of them in one list, but if you read enough around the publishing industry, you will encounter multiple partial lists, several surveys, and quite a few shoptalk stats swaps that document these comfortably independent authors who may not be a household name, but don't care because they sell enough books to equal, exceed, or comprise their day job.

She named it The Editorial Department because it provided the same services that editorial departments at publishing houses had once routinely offered.

Because Australia is behind the US in ebook sales they have many «names» that an author will consider when self - publishing including Lulu or Smashwords.

If possible, avoid using your own name as part of the business title, because this will tip off reviewers and bookstore owners that the book is self - published.

I'm pursuing traditional publishing because I feel like they add an instant «brand name» to my work.

I may have to change the name to exclude «publishing» because that might not be around in a few years.

The reason people are making a living without being household names while the names are not is because traditional publishing has to a large extent come to treat writers as fodder for the mill, something to be profited from, rather than partners.

I opted to publish under my own name because mine could go either way, but like Amanda, I'm in this to become a professional, not to prove a point.

The name of my new publishing company will be Black Arrow Publishing because my stories have been forged by my father and his father bpublishing company will be Black Arrow Publishing because my stories have been forged by my father and his father bPublishing because my stories have been forged by my father and his father before him.

She said that when it was finally rejected (because it was too similar to another book being published by a big name house), «we realized this was a concern we were likely going to run into elsewhere, so Hoover made the choice, in consultation with me, to go the independent publishing route and be the first to work with our agency in this capacity.»

Many traditionally published «named» authors have day jobs because it is VERY hard to live on what traditional publishing pays.

The belief is that unknown authors with no publishing sales histories are a gamble because the lack of name recognition creates a hurdle that may keep the book from finding its audience — hence the tendency to publish the same famous names over and over again.

So there is a stigma against self - publishing authors who do it simply because they want to see their name on a book.

And if you're curious why the company names are not listed in order, it is because they are numbered in the order that they appear in Top Self Publishing Firms.

It wasn't exactly the best way but it worked to get my name out there a bit and right after I knew I would be self publishing because I would have control.

You have ZERO credibility here, and between the «book burning» issue, the lack of courage in posting your real name (I think that's because you're afraid people will find out that you are one of the people Writer Beware has already exposed as a fraud) and your noisy, Scientology style efforts at discrediting some of the most respected experts in the publishing industry, you're only convincing people to think that pretty much anything that comes out of your mouth is a lie or a misrepresentation of the truth.

All that said, I would probably have a lot more stuff under a Kristine Kathryn Rusch than I did because I got started in traditional publishing, and I have three established names, pen names.

I would venture to say that those self - published authors who are doing exceptionally well and are able to reach those outlets are probably able to do so because they built their name and reputation with a major or indie publisher first.

If, as she argues, unpublished writers are unpublished because their writing stinks, why in god's name is she defying her own logic and reviewing self - published books?

I avoided to publish the names of those who paid for my book marketing services, because you can see these authors by yourself, browsing the categories of this website, above all book reviews, books added to an Italian library and press releases.

From your position it's interesting, because you've already established yourself for many years as an author working with traditional houses, your route to self - publishing means that you already have a name behind you.

If this seems familiar, it's because a scandal broke out last year when it was discovered that a white man had been publishing his poetry under an Asian pen name.

Their decision to write under a single pseudonym came about when writing their first novel; they submitted an unsolicited manuscript to an editor hoping for some feedback and, because most books are published under a single name, they chose to submit the manuscript under the single name Charles Todd.

While the author is still hiring these professionals for various aspects of book publishing — such as editing, marketing, or cover design, to name a few — the cost to hire these professionals is smaller because they will later earn a portion of the royalties.

Because he is also publishing his first YA novel - in - verse this year (written with Mary Rand Hess), about a young rock star named Blade.

Good romance writers can earn a living without anyone in New York publishing knowing their names, because they publish and promote their work themselves.

She now writes her own books under a pen name because nobody will buy books published under her real name anymore.

Because to self - publish under your own name was to commit career suicide.

Often, writers jot out their ideas and hit Publish just because they want their name to be out there.

And the only way I can afford to do this is because I have a ton of self - published titles under a pen name.

When a genuine «big» name goes solo it will likely open up the floodgates as many authors continue to search for publishing deals because of the comfort zone they provide.

Not the type of pen name you adopt because you need to hide your writing career from employers, stalkers, mob bosses, or grannies who don't approve of your «active romance» novels (all valid reasons to write under a pseudonym), but the type you feel you have to create because you're going to publish something in a different genre.

Is that because a female name might be considered a handicap in SF publishing?