Sentences with phrase «published decisions in cases»

A former Deputy Attorney General with the New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice from 1976 - 1979, Mr. Sacharow has numerous published decisions in cases which he litigated before the trial and Appellate Courts of New Jersey.

Based on one of the published decisions in this case: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2014/2014onsc3209/2014onsc3209.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAVc3QuIGxld2lzIHYuIHJhbmNvdXJ0AAAAAAE

Not exact matches

The decision in the ACCC's case against PZ Cussons alleging participation in a laundry detergent cartel was handed down late last year, with Justice Wigney dismissing the ACCC's claim; the reasons for judgment have now been published.

Venneman and colleagues5 recently demonstrated that infants who are formula fed are twice as likely to die of SIDS than breastfed infants based on a case control study of 333 SIDS cases compared to 998 aged matched controls in Germany, from 1998 - 2001, consistent with previously published reports.35 While no studies show that co-sleeping in the form of bedsharing, specifically, is imperative for breastfeeding enhancement, many studies have shown that in order to get more sleep and to ease caring for their infants the decision to breastfeed often leads mothers to adopt routine bedsharing for at least part of the night36 - 40 even where they never intended to do so.41, 42 Indeed, nearly 50 % of breastfeeding mothers in the United States and Great Britain adopt bedsharing for some part of the night,38,43 - 45 and breastfeeding women are twice as likely to sleep with their babies in the first month relative to mothers electing to bottle - feed.39

As at the time of these publications, the decision is the Agyei — Twum case had been published and was therefore binding on all the actors in this case.

These include the behaviour of the Italian government in the aftermath of Chernobyl, the basis of decision - making in civil nuclear power in Switzerland and France, and the controversy over the supposed effects of radiation doses to fathers on their offspring at Sellafield (a large case control study, which has recently been published, contradicts the views in the book), and the Black enquiry into childhood leukaemias in the vicinity of the plant.

Nurse anesthetists often receive guidance from physician anesthesiologists, yet bill their time as if they are making decisions alone, according to a recent study (1) of more than 9,000 cases published online in Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Levinson's team has posted a number of other case studies on Justice in Schools and published still more in Dilemmas of Educational Ethics, specifically to help educators, administrators, parents, and even students themselves have productive conversations about hard decisions.

In some cases, we've made our decisions based on the manufacturer's published acceleration specs — specifically, 0 - 60 mph times — but in others, we've taken a look at what the aftermarket has to offer in terms of tuning and performance parts for each modeIn some cases, we've made our decisions based on the manufacturer's published acceleration specs — specifically, 0 - 60 mph times — but in others, we've taken a look at what the aftermarket has to offer in terms of tuning and performance parts for each modein others, we've taken a look at what the aftermarket has to offer in terms of tuning and performance parts for each modein terms of tuning and performance parts for each model.

While consumers and industry watchers alike have spent a fair amount of time waiting eagerly to see how the ruling handed down against Apple for anti-trust violations would actually impact the publishing industry, the tech company has made a statement of its own asserting that the decision by Judge Denise Cote in the case brought against them by the Department of Justice is overly punitive and harsh.

Writers still have little clout legally (as witness recent court cases and decisions that treat publishers and distributors and libraries as the only folks with skin in the game) and we never will as long as we waste time sniping at each other and publishing models.

Below is that handy list of pros and cons for both traditional and self - publishing I promised at the start of all this, (in case you haven't made a decision yet), followed by a list of links that I highly suggest you check out.

In both cases, it was the decision to self - publish that was heavily rewarded.

In a decision that could start an e-book price war in the publishing industry, a federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement between the Justice Department and three major publishers in a civil antitrust case that accused the companies of collusion in the pricing of digital bookIn a decision that could start an e-book price war in the publishing industry, a federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement between the Justice Department and three major publishers in a civil antitrust case that accused the companies of collusion in the pricing of digital bookin the publishing industry, a federal judge on Thursday approved a settlement between the Justice Department and three major publishers in a civil antitrust case that accused the companies of collusion in the pricing of digital bookin a civil antitrust case that accused the companies of collusion in the pricing of digital bookin the pricing of digital books.

Ten cases will be presented, illustrating a variety of clinical presentations, and demonstrating the candidate's ability to work logically through a case, to select and justify the decisions made, and to evaluate the outcome in the context of the published literature.

The decision references a previous case in which «the court found that certain published comments were not defamatory because they were so ludicrous and outrageous as to be unbelievable and therefore incapable of lowering the reputation of the plaintiff in the minds of right - thinking persons.»

SciDev.net: This policy brief, published by the Overseas Development Institute, explores how different types of knowledge feed into policymaking processes — based on case - studies in three South - East Asian countries — and suggests that classifying knowledge can be a useful way of promoting evidence - based decisions.

Thus, for example, in the present case the president of the Queen's Bench Division observed: «Courts and Tribunals acting judicially are generally required to give reasons for their decisions, and further normally required to publish them for the proper public administration of justice so as to comply with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.»

Just published is the appellate decision of Judge Dight, assisted by Master Whalan, in the case of May v Wavell.

Dallas continued to collect and publish Pennsylvania decisions in a second volume of his Reports, and when the Supreme Court began hearing cases, he added those cases to his reports, starting towards the end of the second volume, «2 Dallas Reports,» with West v. Barnes (1791).

Some bloggers seem to think they're still in law school, publishing lengthy case summaries of recent decisions that would bore lawyers, let alone clients, who happened upon them.

Excerpts on the decision to publish and whether to issue summary affirmances might be helpful in training externs and clerks in a judicial opinion writing course to give the students background in some of the decisions judges must make in addition to how to decide cases and write the opinions.

They have not only litigated hundreds of insurance cases with great success at the trial court level, but they've also helped shape the law in this area through their published appellate decisions,» commented Frank Falzetta, head of Sheppard Mullin's Insurance practice.

A simple search of published court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.

Patterson and Joyce note, for example, that, after the decision in 1834 in Wheaton v. Peters, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the goverment had no copyright in judicial decisions, publishers scrambled to publish case law reporters once the monopoly over reporting had been removed; this resulted in more publications being available to the public at a lower cost (L. Ray Patterson and Craig Joyce, «Monopolizing The Law: The Scope of Copyright Protection for Law Reports and Statutory Compilations?

Published data such as this will hopefully mean that claimants and their lawyers as well as funders and insurers can be more collaborative in making informed decisions with regard to case management, budgeting and forum.

In one decision (R v Maxwell [2010] UKHL 48), where an appeal by a defendant in a criminal case was dismissed, no reasons were published by the end of the year because they might have prejudiced related criminal proceedings which were still pendinIn one decision (R v Maxwell [2010] UKHL 48), where an appeal by a defendant in a criminal case was dismissed, no reasons were published by the end of the year because they might have prejudiced related criminal proceedings which were still pendinin a criminal case was dismissed, no reasons were published by the end of the year because they might have prejudiced related criminal proceedings which were still pending.

The Library of Congress has published more than 225 years of Supreme Court decisions in searchable image format showing the cases as they originally appeared in the United States Reports, dating back to the court's first decision in 1791.

In the 1970s decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada were published by the Government of Canada in the Supreme Court Reports but many times it took up to two years for a case to be publisheIn the 1970s decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada were published by the Government of Canada in the Supreme Court Reports but many times it took up to two years for a case to be publishein the Supreme Court Reports but many times it took up to two years for a case to be published.

He published many articles both in technical law journals and also in the New York Review of Books, none more important than his critique in several articles in 1977 and 1978 of the supreme court's inconclusive decision of the Regents of the University of California v Bakke case, which arose out of widespread dissatisfaction with «affirmative action», or positive discrimination.

The Federal Court based its decision on U.S. case law2 and an academic article by published in the Marquette Law Review, 3 ruling that common interest privilege was «not a valid component» of solicitor - client privilege and was irreconcilable with the underlying rationale for solicitor - client privilege.

I was personally involved in two published seminal decisions that impacted the law: Miller v. Lakeside Village, a case involving mould exposure to a homeowner asserted to have been caused by water intrusion and alleged personal injuries as a result.

That was partly because insolvency cases were treated as commercial actions, so they were filtered effectively to him (or 2 or 3 other judges that were on the commercial bench in the Court of Session), but also because as more experienced senior judges became aware of the issues the lack of guidance was causing, they took active steps to ensure that the decisions being taking were published.

He served as the expert witness in immigration law in the landmark California Appeals Court case of People v. Bautista (2004) 115 Cal.App.4 th 229, which held that failure to defend against an aggravated felony can be ineffective assistance of counsel, and he was counsel in several key published decisions on crim / imm in the Ninth Circuit.

His ground - breaking book, «Sentencing as a Human Process,» was published in 1971 through the new Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto, the result of intensive, structured interviews with 71 full - time Ontario magistrates (virtually everyone in the province), together with extensive analysis of their various cases, decisions and sentences imposed.

The nice aspect of this published decision, with respect to 1021.5 jurisprudence, is that it held a claimant seeking no monetary award could still be held to have an overriding financial interest and, separately, that even an «indirect» financial interest — in this case, competitive survival — certainly allowed trial judges to consider such an interest (gauging whether it was real or speculative in nature).

Furthermore, by shunting these cases to an administrative tribunal that does not publish its decisions, the impression given is that the government is primarily interested in saving money and avoiding scrutiny.

Eleven of our case decisions have been published by the Nevada Supreme Court, impacting how lower state courts make rulings in personal injury cases.

It is also worth noting that there is provision within the draft Bill to allow for the publication of Pensions Ombudsman decisions in anonymized form (to date, only summaries of selected cases have been published by the Pensions Ombudsman's office).

While many judges would say that too many of their decisions are published in print, the test employed by editors at Maritime Law Book is: would the case be useful to a lawyer.

In keeping with the principle of flexibility, it may be better for a publisher like EMP to focus on and publish only the author text (notes, commentary, analysis and questions) and then link that material to a database of cases, leaving to instructors (and students) the decision about what to read in connection with the coursIn keeping with the principle of flexibility, it may be better for a publisher like EMP to focus on and publish only the author text (notes, commentary, analysis and questions) and then link that material to a database of cases, leaving to instructors (and students) the decision about what to read in connection with the coursin connection with the course.

The cost of publishing a decision online could exceptionally be in the bottom range of the two digits but most often, for a few extra dollars per case, court and tribunal decisions can be made accessible to anyone to search, read, take, use, add value to, and so on.

The court / tribunal is in a position to quickly post high - profile cases, correct a decision or withdraw an erroneously published one.

In either case, a court could publish the majority of their decision electronically and widely, while restricting publication of materials that they were credibly shown to be confidential.

In all cases it's important to note that these products are built using the exact same body of data that has been used in legal research for decades, as lawyers are highly unlikely to be able to quote a decision in court that hasn't been publisheIn all cases it's important to note that these products are built using the exact same body of data that has been used in legal research for decades, as lawyers are highly unlikely to be able to quote a decision in court that hasn't been publishein legal research for decades, as lawyers are highly unlikely to be able to quote a decision in court that hasn't been publishein court that hasn't been published.

The context is this: in the good old days of print case law reporters (e.g., Dominion Law Reports or Ontario Reports) when life was much simpler, qualified editors chose to publish only the significant or important decisions.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is asking for comments on proposals to publish: findings of misconduct that result in a reprimand; conditions put on practising certificates; details of allegations in cases accepted by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal; agreements to conclude a regulatory investigation; and decisions to intervene in legal practices.

Indeed the Globe24hr case considered by both the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Federal Court reveals some of the consequences for individual privacy when such decisions are published in online repositories.

Published 12 times per year, Electronically In Touch features advice, guidance, and tips useful to the young lawyer both professionally and personally; includes «nuts and bolts» information about substantive legal issues; highlights cases and decisions of interest; provides updates from the Executive Committee; offers opportunities for career, professional, and leadership development; and lists a calendar of events.

As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said during oral argument in this case, judges should be «above the fray,» and Justice Antonin Scalia's remarks were similar, to the effect that «there are things we just don't let judges do, like publish op - eds in newspapers to respond to criticism of the court's decisions.