I also show that actual surface measurements give a far different view of surface temps than
the published global temp records.
Not exact matches
Regarding»
global temp» lying didn't start in the 80's — it started since the day Darwin
published his book!
I just
published a post on my blog about the interaction of CO2 and average
global temps over geologic time and it seems that CO2 has had very little effect on those
temps.
Perhaps if it is so simple, you can explain it to all those simpletons who keep
publishing all those graphs labeled «
global warming» that only include land surface air
temps.
Since the
published GAT's show
global warming that neither the daily min nor daily max
temps measurements show, and that GCM's are tuned to show a matching trend.
My opinion on
global average
temp as
published is they have no relation to the actual measurements.
It looks to me like there is a disparity between these
published papers in the implications for the change in the rate of
global cooling after a 1C increase in
temp.
NASA
global July
temp not yet
published, but thumbnail - map reveals 0.71 C warmer than normal; would be hottest ever: http://bit.ly/Gisthom