Not exact matches
Even more revealing: An
experiment published in the Journal of Social Science and Clinical
Psychology found that students who were faring poorly in college did even worse following efforts to boost their self - esteem.
University of Virginia
psychology professor Brian Nosek and his colleagues at the nonprofit Center for Open Science got help from over 350 scientists to repeat 100 high - profile
psychology experiments published in 2008 — the largest replication study to date.
«There are papers already out there that I've reviewed that I kind of wish my reviews were
published with because I think it's important for any reader of the paper to take into account some of the concerns that I and other reviewers were bringing up — and I think that's true for a lot of science that's out there,» says Michelle Wirth, an assistant professor of
psychology at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana who has
published a paper with F1000Research, another journal
experimenting with open peer review.
Nosek has been at the forefront of efforts to clean up his field — he and more than 175 collaborators are repeating a random sample of the hundreds of studies
published in 2008 in three major
psychology journals — and he and Ratliff are both part of Project Implicit, a long - running collaboration that also provides free software for running behavioral
experiments with standardized methods.
In «Touch and Go: Merely Grasping a Product Facilitates Brand Perception and Choice,»
published in Applied Cognitive
Psychology, they conduct a series of
experiments and show that blindfolded people induced to grasp familiar products (a bottle of Coke, for example) under the guise of a weight judgement task are then quicker in recognizing the brand name of the product when it slowly appears on a screen, include more frequently the product in a list of brands of the same category, and choose more often that product among others as a reward for having participated in the
experiment.
In the study,
published in the Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, Diehl and her colleagues outline a series of nine
experiments involving over 2,000 participants in the field and the lab designed to examine the effect of taking photographs of an experience on people's enjoyment of an activity.
In two related
experiments published in November 2013 in the Journal of Experimental
Psychology, the scientists developed a scale to measure belief in science — the view that scientific inquiry offers a superior guide to reality.
Last year Clifford Stott of the University of Liverpool in England and his colleagues
published in
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law a paper that relates a giant
experiment at the Euro2004 championship finals.
The study,
published in a 2006 issue of the Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, showed that participants in the
experiment told an average of 2.19 The widespread online availability of background information makes it even more risky to lie in job interviews.
The study,
published in a 2006 issue of the Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, showed that participants in the
experiment told an average of 2.19 In a 2013 article for CBS MoneyWatch, Suzanne Lucas interviewed Patrick Barnett, an investigator for ARS Employment Background Screening.