Sentences with phrase «published scientist»

There are a few publishing scientists that strongly disagree with the established consensus that humans are the primary drivers of modern climate change and yet they seem to find funding without much difficulty.

Because that number came from an online survey that had 77 published scientists answer «yes» to a vague question.

The other part of this («authors with something extra to say») etc. is less controversial, but I wonder whether many publishing scientists would find this very interesting.

Less than half of published scientists endorse global warming Klaus - Martin Schulte examined all papers published from 2004 to February 2007.

This group consists to a large extent of signatories of public statements disapproving of mainstream climate science, many of whom are not publishing scientists.

can't you approach it in the way that says Dyson is not a current publishing scientist in peer - reviewed journals whose current work stands up under peer review?

I clearly heard the exact phrase «over 3 %» deliberately and clearly stated yesterday at a government - funded research institute in Boulder at a presentation by a visiting publishing scientist using the latest sources who is researching the latest CO2 trend anomalies.

Hmmm... Someone should enlighten Dr McCulloch on the kinds of things actively publishing scientists tend to waste their time on

«We are very vigorous in choosing our leaders of drug discovery; all of the leaders are outstanding, well published scientists in their own right.

The few sceptics concerning aspects of AGW science have little chance of being heard unless they are publishing scientists with a respectable track record.

97 % of actively publishing scientists have confirmed the «diagnosis.»

In a recent essay published at Science Careers, Fatma Kaplan, a well - published scientist and adjunct lecturer at the University of Florida in Gainesville, explains what she has learned in applying for 150 tenure - track faculty positions since earning her doctorate in 2004.

I work as a molecular biologist and I am a published scientist, but my work is only one part of my life.

The idea is to make it impossible for scientists who are skeptical of global warming to receive any funding or get published in peer - reviewed journals — and then declare that, lo and behold, there are no published scientists who are skeptical about global warming!

When 97 % of the published scientists agree on the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, then we got something.

The idea is to make it impossible for scientists who are skeptical of global warming to receive any funding or get published in peer - reviewed journals â $» and then declare that, lo and behold, there are no published scientists who are skeptical about global warming!