Sentences with phrase «publisher gets a cut»

As Lewis noted on Monday after his story was publicized, some publishers» articles on the story came emblazoned with fake ads — online publishers tend to just put empty boxes on their sites that are filled by ad networks, with the publisher getting a cut.

They don't make a lot of money per each sale, after the publisher gets their cut.

If the user clicks to buy a product from the publisher's content via the app, the publisher gets a cut of the sale.

Not exact matches

With the Acceptable Ads Platform, the publishers deal with the big exchanges as usual — they get their 80 % cut of ad revenue from Google or AppNexus, and Adblock Plus collects its cut of the remaining 20 %.

The solution in both e-books and video games therefore seems obvious: publishers should work with the retailers to find a solution in which they get a cut of the resale.

Publishers would likely hate such a move for the same reason that video game makers do — they wouldn't get a cut of it.

Valve's Steam platform pioneered digital distribution back in 2003, almost singlehandedly rescuing PC gaming from oblivion while simultaneously putting a significant brake on piracy, getting consumers to accept the often widely hated digital rights management and increasing profitability for publishers and developers by cutting out physical retail.

Rather than charging consumers $ 70 a pop as they do now, publishers would have more flexibility if they were getting a cut of resold games, which they don't now.

the only way I am not going to throw in the marriage towel is if he cuts bait NOW inconveniences his sponsors, publisher, groupies, the ego of Doug and get home to fix his family in a state of shear devastation.»

One gets the sense that the authors wanted to write an advanced book on cutting - edge theology but were leaned on by a publisher in need of a wider audience.

Stardew Valley for Nintendo Switch is getting a new update that will cut the save times up to 32 % according to publisher Chucklefish.

It stands to reason that the publisher wanted to get the title out on shelves as soon as possible regardless of the cuts required.

In addition, it's getting harder and harder for traditionally published authors to wrest their rights back from publishers, which is undoubtedly cutting down on the number of backlist titles being newly self - published.

Publishers also get to set the final pricing, and since they are cutting out most of the supply chain, more of the consumer dollar comes back to them.

That's because you only get a cut of the net royalties, which means it might be calculated from the sale price, but the publisher only gives you a cut of what they get after Amazon takes out their portion.

Me, when I finally have a finished novel I will write it as many times as it takes to get a traditional agent and a traditional publisher, because that's the only way I'll ever know in my heart that my writing really made the cut.

And according to agent Meredith Barnes, some agencies are indeed charging way too much for the service — especially when they pay themselves 15 % to «represent» the client to themselves as «publishers» who get another hefty cut — often over 50 %.

Authors should be getting larger royalty percentages on e-books because of lower distribution costs, so the publisher doesn't need to take as large a cut to cover their costs.

The article, basically said that Amazon decided that if publishers were going to make all this money on ebooks and not give authors a cut, then Amazon would prefer to get a larger piece of the pie.

(Although I'm guessing that if they got a contract with a big traditional publisher whose editor told them to cut out all - ing words at beginnings of sentences or lose the contract, they'd probably accede.)

Because as Mr. Wendig says, if you're trying to get a cut of sales off of my book, and you're getting in there and altering the language and you are neither my publisher nor my editor, that warrants a big fat fuck you, no.

It gives me a simple, fair way to cut all the other parts of the value - chain in on my success: because this is a regular retail sale, my publishers get their regular share, likewise my agents.

And as Kris pointed out in her blog, with traditional big publishers switching over to electronic books and more print - on - demand books, they get out from under shipping and printing and warehousing costs, and that ugly return system gets cut down.

They will be very competitive and the exact rates are set by the publishers and Kobo gets an indeterminate cut of each sale.

In its original conception, Google wanted consumers to be able to print copies and cut and paste text, while publishers would get a sub-standard 63 % of the revenue.

Apple's deal with publishers, as you may know, lets the publishers set the price for e-books (with a lowest - price guarantee) in Apple's iBooks store with Apple getting a 30 % cut on sales.

What works for JA there is that these are out of print back catalog books that the publisher has already gotten their cut on and no longer get a piece of the action.

You get the greatest cut — not the traditional publisher.

Micropayments are especially interesting because they can be billed directly to an Apple iTunes account, Apple gets a cut, so does the publisher.

Apropos of the question of how much Amazon is getting from sales of ebooks based on publisher (something Steve Zacharius suggested self - publishers should worry about, because as long as traditional publishers are Amazon's cash cow, they might do something mean to us and cut our percentages), I did my own mini-analysis of the top 50 bestselling ebooks on Amazon.

Jackie said: «Apropos of the question of how much Amazon is getting from sales of ebooks based on publisher (something Steve Zacharius suggested self - publishers should worry about, because as long as traditional publishers are Amazon's cash cow, they might do something mean to us and cut our percentages), I did my own mini-analysis of the top 50 bestselling ebooks on Amazon.

Most times, the discrepancy will be because the payment was reported on a prior statement, or the foreign publisher paid after a cut - off date, but sometimes the foreign publisher is trying to get away with out paying.

Unless her agent got a cut she very much capitalized on the benefits of self - publishing for that project, which I loved... The biggest threat to traditional publishing are traditional publishers... If a gate is slammed in my face, is it my responsibility to come back and paint it when I've found another gate, or built myself a ladder?

They would remove the initial cut from the publisher from selling the book, and then get another fee from reselling it to another user.

Well, you've first got to refine it to the point that its cut catches the eye of even the most cynical publisher.

However, the Web giant keeps a 30 percent cut of each sale, while the author or publisher gets 70 percent.

Just remember, your ultimate goal is to get the publisher or agent to request your manuscript so if something in the letter doesn't serve this purpose, then cut it out.

Sure, I could pay the $ 180 subscription fee on Zinio.com to get a digital subscription or the $ 249.99 to Publishers Weekly for them to cut more trees and deliver the magazine to my house.

If you're lucky enough to get an agent and a traditional publisher, they will do the majority of this legwork for you, but they'll also cut deeply into your earning potential.

No worrying about selling past an advance, or taking pennies on the dollar for each sale because a publisher and agent need to get a cut.

Was it really because interest flagged or because the publishers thought they could skew the system and get money quicker by cutting corners and changing the order paradigm they'd spent years creating?

Charlie Stross joins those wondering if publishers» Amazon fears haven't got them Cutting their own throats.

I've gotten the impression that publishers have cut corners lately, putting more of the burden on the authors without compensating them (aka unfunded mandate), just when authors don't need publishers nearly as much as they used to.

Under agency, publishers earn 70 % of the list price as their cut, and the retailer gets 30 %.

That means the author gets a smaller cut while the publisher takes a larger share.

I don't imagine anyone here will be interested in any of the promoted books, which look like the kind of middlebrow crap you find on the shelves at Tesco, all romance novels and misery memoirs, but it looks like Amazon are getting more and more serious about cutting publishers out of the equation altogether.

The publishers (all of whom settled with the government before the trial) have tried to argue in the past that they were forced to cut a deal with Apple because of Amazon's (s amzn) monopoly — but when it gets right down to it, the real culprit is the DRM lock - in that the publishers themselves pushed for.

A revenue - sharing plan that is more appealing to publishers who don't want to cut prices (publishers get to set any price with Apple.

It means you have if you want to you know do an audiobook or you want to have a course that has the material that's inside of that book guess who gets a cut or guess who gets to have their hands in that your publisher and if you get speaking engagements off your book guess who's taken a cut of that your publisher so there's some real if you were using the content that's inside of your book you actually don't own that content anymore.

Her comment came about as a result of my wondering aloud what sort of cut a deal - making publisher like S&S might expect to get from the relatively expensive offerings of ASI's programs.