Sentences with phrase «publisher gets no money from»

My publisher gets no money from them but they had my book on their site.

Not exact matches

Unfortunately, most e-publishers are pretty hush - hush about the amount of money their authors receive in royalties, but it's safe to say that it's probably more than mainline publishers offer, but not as much as you'd get from publishing your book yourself.

'' From the records, Metuh got over N400 million, he has not said anything because we need the public money to be returned so that it's going to be used for public good,» Mr. Magu said during a meeting with online media publishers in Lagos.

You don't get the advance all at one time and you aren't going to see any more money from the publisher until you have earned out the advance and, believe me, that doesn't happen very often.

If you can get $ 25,000 from a publisher, that's very good money.

Yes the royalties are higher than one would expect to earn from a traditional publisher but it hardly offsets the amount of money spent by the author getting their book to press through one of these publishers.

If the publishers would agree a deal with Tom Kabinet, they would get a share for every sold e-book, even when that was an illegal one, they did get some money to compensate that which they would never got if people only download them from usenet, but they didn't even react on that offer made by Tom Kabinet.

When I get paid for those, the money comes from the German publisher to my agent and then to me, instead of going through DAW.

And if you want to make that extra effort too, think about buying your ebooks from other sites — especially directly from publishers, if you have that opportunity, because that'll have the added bonus of making sure more money ultimately gets into the hands of your favorite authors.

It gets me money: once I take the normal 30 percent retail share off the top, and the customary 25 percent royalty from my publisher on the back - end, my royalty is effectively doubled.

Amazon, among others, opened the flood gates to make money from self - publishers, knowing that flooding would occur; knowing that readers would get inundated.

Bloggers like Lawson also make a lot of money through advertising and yes, they got book deals from traditional publishers, but they were internet celebrities by the time they got them.

But publishers want more money than they are getting from the new world of declining hardcover sales and they are pushing the Agency plan rather than being creative, making special editions and charging more for those, in a win - win situation.

The problem seems to be that, whilst Publishers should have an incentive to maximise their revenues from Amazon, and thus maximise royalties to authors, they appear to be screwing both themselves, and their authors, over by settings prices at levels that ensure that they both get less money out of Amazon than they might otherwise do.

In order for B&T to make any money they would have to get a discount from the publisher of at least 60 % I would think.

Through our free manuscript review process we will steer you in the right direction, help you save money, make better decisions, market your book successfully, and also make the self publishing process a much better experience than you will get from the many different self publishers out there.

Small publishers, often started by writers, are also starting to understand this thinking and are jumping like crazy to get a small slice of this long term money from authors by helping authors get their work into all the various places for readers to find.

So publishers slowly, from the mid-1960s onward, asked authors for longer and longer books to give the readers the feeling they were getting more story for their money as the book prices went up and up and up.

If true, you can't blame BN for flexing its retail muscle and trying to get more money from the publishers.

The key to making money as a Self Publisher is to write a lot of books, preferably a series that hooks readers from the get go.

There are now people getting books into print for very little money, working online book review and publicity sources, getting attention in social media, and selling thousands of books at profits that obliterate what authors used to get as royalties from traditional publishers.

Sure, she makes money from each sale but the publisher and the vendor make far more than the author who doesn't get to decide the price.

The very best books from the very best writers get published; books get sold; and writers, agents, editors, publishers, etc. get what they want: money.

They've bought into the fiction that legacy publishers add value to their work and that is why publishers get the donkey share of monies from each sale.

As Rachelle Gardner noted in a recent blog post, the typical advance for a first - time traditionally published author is $ 5,000 - $ 15,000 per book, and most of those first - time authors do not sell through their advance, so that is all the money they will ever get from that book (and if you don't sell through in the first 12 mos, the publisher may not be so excited about buying another book from you).

Some Definitions Vanity Press — publishers whose business model is predicated on making money off authors by getting money directly from them, rather than through royalties off the books the author is selling (see the SFWA extensive page on Vanity).

More times than not, authors come away a tad sour from their New York experience — they thought it would be so much more — that the publisher would pitch and market the book everywhere; sell gazillions of copies; get them a blizzard of media; they would make oodles of money; it would be so much fun; and all would live happily ever after.

Stephen King and James Patterson are not bad at business or math, and they aren't at all happy that Amazon is trying to muck with their business (which includes many more sellers than just Amazon,) in order to gain more control over the marketplace and get more co-opt money from publishers.

But given everything (including the abysmal offer I got from a traditional, midsize publisher for my first book), I think I've made more money self - publishing than I would have with a traditional publisher.

«Rule 34» was sold in 2008, so benefited from publishers not thinking ebook rights were worth much, so in principle I get nearly as much money from an ebook sale as from a hardcover.

The more money the publisher makes on the back of the work being done by libraries, the more books libraries will get from the publisher.

Personally, I don't get books which have the access blocked, and I don't intentionally link to books with the access blocked in the blog (I don't want to give the publisher money on books where that decision has been made, and I don't want to benefit from it by people clicking on the link in my blog).

Is it just that Amazon has more money to throw around, or are they getting a better deal from the publishers in the first place?

The extra money publishers can get from people willining to pay more for first access (and a slightly prettier package) is incredibly important, as well as being a beautiful case study of how to sell the same thing to people willing to pay different prices.

«Consumers get whacked by the foreign transaction fees, bank teller fees and cash withdrawal fees every time they take money from a cash machine overseas,» says Charles Leocha, publisher of ConsumerTraveler.com.

- Announce game for Spring 2015 - Tell people in January the game is «pretty much finished» - Announce game is coming out in September instead - Launch 2 additional Kickstarters for a Legends-esque game spin - off with absolutely nothing to show (until the last minute) and an anime - short of said spin - off - Deny rumors that any money from the new Kickstarters will be going into the original project and affirm that the funds are «completely independent» - Deny rumors that original project is getting delayed - Admit near end of spin - off game Kickstarter that a publisher was lined up all along for it - See spin - off game Kickstarter crash and burn - A couple days later, announce delay of original project

Brent: It's easy to overlook the little guys when it comes to video games; everyone knows AAA games will always benefit from publishers who spend money on mass marketing to get the word out about their latest and greatest titles.

They do nt have money so when publisher approach them to fund and get a phat check from royalties its hard to say no

The developer then sells the now years old port at full price, effectively killing sales for that game on the Mac because they keep thinking they would get more money selling it themselves than to get a one off payment from the publisher for porting the game.

And if they are famous, established developers and / or one working with a well - established IP, it begs the question of why they can't just get funded from the existing «smart money» investing in games, i.e. publishers and VC's.

Microsoft and the major publishers are keen to find new ways of preventing piracy and ensuring they make money from every copy of a game that gets distributed.

There is nothing you can do to fix it without getting written permission from the publishers who have probably long ago sold the rights to do this to somebody else for an immense amount of money.

An inalienable right for publishers to get paid whenever anybody links to their content, on social media or elsewhere, creates a perverse incentive structure: From the perspective of the social network, spreading fake news in the form of sponsored posts makes them money, whereas their users sharing legitimate news articles costs them money.