Very few of these chapters will deal with the editor and
publisher side of publishing.
Not exact matches
Schneider: First, with regard to your due diligence as a
publisher, why hasn't DISCOVER
published a compelling account
of the other
side?
But what about the opposite
side of the coin: the best - selling traditionally
published authors who have kicked their
publishers to the curb, focused on self -
publishing their books both past and present?
I gave you advice based on 45 years in all
sides of the
publishing industry, based on being
published since 1967, based on being a writing teacher, based on working with writers who get on the NYT best sellers lists, and based on working on issues involving online promotions including in regard to Amazon with Amazon and with
publishers I have worked with, about how you should and should not send out these requests.
By the way, it's unlikely a traditional
publishing company will allow you to do this unless you manage to negotiate it into your book deal contract (the
publisher gets the majority
of the rights — a frustrating down
side).
There were genre writers on both
sides of the dispute, but on the
publishing side were huddled the biographers, urban historians, midlist novelists — that is, all the people who were able to eke out a living because
publishers still paid advances, acting as a kind
of local literary bank, in anticipation
of future sales.
Authors who are attached to major
publishers are on the
publishers»
side, while self -
published authors, many
of whom have been rejected by the traditional
publishers, are
siding with Amazon and other digital
publishers.
Publishers Launch Conferences expand on consultant Mike Shatzkin's two decades of organizing and presenting forward - looking publishing conferences around the world, and maximize his deep experience as a top consultant for the digital era in publishing, working over the last 15 years with everyone from Google, Ingram, HP, and Overdrive to Panasonic, Copia, Sprout and even SoftBook as well as a host of major publishers on both sides of the
Publishers Launch Conferences expand on consultant Mike Shatzkin's two decades
of organizing and presenting forward - looking
publishing conferences around the world, and maximize his deep experience as a top consultant for the digital era in
publishing, working over the last 15 years with everyone from Google, Ingram, HP, and Overdrive to Panasonic, Copia, Sprout and even SoftBook as well as a host
of major
publishers on both sides of the
publishers on both
sides of the Atlantic.
I would add on the
side of traditional
publishing that 1) It is easier to get national publicity because producers give more weight to a traditionally
published book, particularly from a larger house (though some self -
published authors certainly do get national publicity as well — it's just harder, in general and 2) a traditional
publisher is generally going to bring a great deal
of experience to the table — from improving the cover or title to layout and design.
An experienced
publishing pro respected by both
sides of the aisle: authors and
publishers.
His rendition
of this course in Los Angeles last year was a study in empowerment when it comes to authors knowing what they can ask their
publishers, what answers — or non-answers — can mean; and how to avoid being intimidated when it's time to assert their
side of the partnership
of publishing.
The tech
side of self -
publishing has moved on leaps and bounds since I last self -
published in 2014 and so, from what I can see, have self -
publishers.
In light
of the traditional
publishing vs. self -
publishing debates we're covering here on the Ether, I want to bring to your attention Mike Shatzkin «s new column,
Publishers adding value on the marketing
side.
And then on the
publishing side we have a whole group
of New York Times bestselling authors that are very successful self -
publishers, and you can go in and ask them any questions that you might have, and there's a whole list
of frequently asked questions and things like that.
Would
publishers see this as a valuable partnership with a company that has grown leaps and bounds in both the content and technology
sides of publishing or would they be concerned that they were losing revenue for another aspect
of publishing that they used to control?
Whilst I agree with you that there is a dark
side to
publishing, I'm surprised by the number
of self
publishers that manipulate Amazon.
When I write that the traditional book
publishing industry sometimes «appears to be operated by 5 big traditional book
publishers in New York for their sole benefit, the rest
of the industry be damned» I thought it would be clear that I not in the stands cheering for that
side of the industry.
Many
of the long standing Chicago book
publishers, however, can agree on one point, that is,
publishing on this
side of the country is more bread - and - butter than glitz and glamour.
· The
publishing industry — how to get started, self
publishing, owning a small press, critiquing, manuscript formatting, book cover design, interior print formatting, romance fiction, the submission process, looking at both
sides of the industry as a
publisher and author, ebooks, psychic fiction, marketing, online promotion and many other topics.
They are the middlemen between the author and the
publisher; they negotiate contract terms and royalty deals and handle the business
side of book
publishing on behalf
of the author.
Some detractors,
of course, will argue with Howey that he, Konrath, and Barry Eisler, who worked on the petition, as well, most certainly are in the proverbial «1 %»
of successful self -
publishers, easily as much as they see the Preston - led effort on the traditionally
publishing side.
The only good
side to his plan, should the major
publishers put it into effect, is that it would create yet another spike
of sales for indie and small press e-books because economics would mean people would try the lower priced books instead
of paying double digits, perhaps high double digits, for a single legacy
published e-book.
Given the very slow
publishing schedules in mainstream
publishing and the fact that there is a limit to how many books a
publisher wants from any given midlist author in a year, the money odds for «most»
of us who are not famous or breakout bestsellers... is in the indie
side of things, because we can
publish on a faster timetable, while still keeping the quality up.
The «out
of print» clause is often one
of an author's only ways to terminate a
publishing contract unilaterally (a legal term that means «one -
sided» — and, in this case, means the author's right to terminate without the
publisher's consent).
Yes, many people are still fighting that war, on both
sides of the debate, and it may well be some time before the most reluctant
publishers realize that their cause is lost, but the gains made by self
publishing have been so pronounced, so rapid and what is most important, so irreversible, that it's time to call it done.
«The thing that has really aggravated me is the one -
sided nature and anonymity
of their business negotiations,» said Karen Christensen, CEO
of Berkshire
Publishing Group, a Massachusetts - based independent
publisher of professional and academic books.
Until 2008, the ebook
side of publishing was a vestigial, if not irrelevant, irritation from the point
of view
of the major
publishers — at less than 1 %
of their turnover it was lost in the line noise.
Like you I am not on a
side so much as acknowledging the
publishing paradigm shift happening under traditional
publishing's feet, trying to figure out where it's going and what the
publishers of the future will.
I should already preface this by saying that, after reading the responses by the
publishers, feel free to discuss your overall position on the situation, because discussion is good, and especially for those who live on the
side where you do read manga that has no chance
of being
published in English for a multitude
of reasons, it may be something you want to know.
I'm inclined to think not: a good
side - effect
of publishing's comparatively slow change is that
publishers have more time to cope with the disruption.
In a time when some agents are
siding with
publishers and bemoaning the sad state
of self -
publishing, here's one who's doing what a good agent should be doing: working for the author.
The impact on the
publishing side of the trade is unknowable, but there is little doubt that it would be significant and would probably be negative for the domestic
publishers (see my earlier paragraph on why).
The news media
sides with the big
publishers in continuing to treat self -
publishing as a kind
of childish prank, precocious because it's sometimes outrageously successful.
Some traditionally
published authors (if they are able) now self -
publish some
of their work, and on the other
side indie authors sign up with traditional
publishers to handle some parts
of the process.
As someone who writes in a couple very different genres and has some work with
publishers while I've self -
published other titles... I get so tired
of hearing authors rage against the other
side.
And we had Jan - Michel Saaksmeier, a game freak on the
publishing side of things who had joined Spil Games only a few weeks prior to the roundtable and had previously been a
publisher and producer at Bigpoint.
Our lawyers have represented clients on both
sides of publishing deals, assisting major
publishers and contributors such as writers and photographers.
E.L. James
published the 50 Shades trilogy with a small Australian
publisher before the rights were snapped up by Random House on both
sides of the Atlantic in April.
Since the company was playing catch - up to some extent with Amazon's Kindle — at least in the e-reader department — it came up with a way
of getting the major
publishing houses on its
side: instead
of the wholesale - pricing approach that existed prior to Apple's entry into the market, which gave retailers (including Amazon) the ability to set book prices wherever they wanted, the agency model would allow
publishers to set the price.