It's a direct attack on who big
publishers feel threatened by: Internet platforms and web startups, as well as smaller, more innovative competitors.
Should traditional
publishers feel threatened by the potential of self - publishing?
It's called Should Traditional
Publishers Feel Threatened by the Potential of Self - Publishing?
Queens College CUNY Sociology Prof. Dana Beth Weinberg follows Sexton on the topic of the survey in a talk titled «Should Traditional
Publishers Feel Threatened by the Potential of Self - Publishing?»
The suggestion is easy to dismiss, but it does speak to a broader question: do traditional
publishers feel threatened by self - publishers?
Not exact matches
Funny, Ignition (the
publisher who will live in infamy with me from now on) didn't indicate on their website — amongst this shocker — all of the following absentee features that make KoF... well, KoF: No final boss, no character intros / outros, only one win pose, only 6 stages (2 are effectively palette - swapped), no special effects when finishing a foe with a super, no arcing story, no teams... no nothing... With some 5 teams of 3 characters each still represented, and a few stragglers, it honestly
feels like this game was published incomplete, like the deadline was a sword of Damocles,
threatening doom.
Publishers often believe they exclusively own the art of content curation and they
feel threatened when they sense others encroaching on their turf.
Publishers feel that their business models are
threatened by the idea of Google books or any service that allows people electronic access to the full text of their publications.