Sentences with phrase «publishers pay»

I hope that the publishers pay attention to this message.

Amazon wants to make major publishers pay from greater visibility and wants to force independent authors to give up rights (i.e. selling through other retailers) to get more visibility.

Publishers pay royalties.

That means most publishers pay more to authors than what prevailing royalty rates might indicate, though there are reports that advances are declining.

+ + + Amazon probably also wants Hachette to pay more for «co-op,» which is like advertising money that publishers pay to retailers so that the retailers will spotlight a book on their website or in their store.

Legitimate publishers pay your royalties at least twice a year.»

Publishers pay a high price (30 - 70 percent of their royalties) just for being discoverable at the market.

Almost every self - publishing company uses one of two printers for print - on - demand book printing, so it's easy to know what other publishers pay for POD books.

Traditional publishers pay you, not the other way around, so what you are actually doing is self - publishing your book.

I know I was manipulated in bookstores by the tables out front that publishers pay extra for and best seller lists, but at least I had the option to wander up and down aisles to see what catches my eye.

Laura is misleading when she says publishers pay a 25 % royalty on ebooks, while Amazon pays 70 % on titles priced between 2.99 and 9.99 and 35 % on titles less than 2.99.

I think this second and equally irrational fear of halving our payout arises from the huge discrepancy between what online distributors pay self - published authors and what traditional publishers pay their authors.

I'd like to see traditional publishers pay a much higher royalty on e-books, with the industry standard at 50 percent.

Publishers pay a 25 % royalty on net.

My publishers pay me a substantial amount up front.

Publishers pay bookstores (called co-op, for cooperative advertising, although the financial difficulties of the past few years have seen some curtailing of co-op money) for end - cap, center table, or step - ladder, face - out placement.

Amazon and other e-book publishers pay authors as much as 70 percent of the revenue their books make.

better than the paltry 6 or 8 % of retail that they were offering but it's not necessarily equal to what Publishers pay via the Agency Model.

Pros of this model: ~ Authors are paid to write the manuscript ~ Publishers pay for the production costs ~ There is some status from publishing with a recognized publisher

(2) Legitimate, traditional publishers PAY you a share of their profits for publishing your book.

The authors caused amazon to get a majority of authors to put there books on amazon and it is the publishers fault for this as they do not want to compete they want amazon to do all the work and to just reap the benefits even if authors receive less as publishers pay less to them.

It was good to them for its own purposes, giving them stuff for free it makes publishers pay for, because then those self - pub authors and all their buddies would buy Kindles, and would be loyal customers who buy other stuff from Amazon that brings in more money.

Overall, compared with what traditional publishers pay out, royalty rates for self - published books are actually quite decent.

Amazon pays writers nearly six times what publishers pay us.

You can also say 50 % of net, which is double what most publishers pay.

Special placement, list placements, displays, etc., are things that Amazon usually gives good selling self - published authors for free, because it suits their purposes, but they make the publishers pay for them.

Publishers pay for listings.

Publishers pay the author, not the other way around.

And the compensation rate for just having folks follow a link from your website or blog seems to compare fairly well to the percentages Traditional Publishers pay for paper books... https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/join/compensation.html Shows a lot higher percentages than I was expecting you to get.

Do legacy publishers pay for visibility of their books on Amazon's various lists?

Legitimate publishers pay all costs up front and so take all the risk.

Outside that range, Amazon only pays 35 % royalties, which is about what some traditional publishers pay authors for ebooks.

Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding that traditional publishers pay for reviews from Kirkus, PW, etc..

You see, publishers pay a lower royalty percentage, according to The Authors Guild, than they do for print books.

Publishers pay all those costs up front, and traditional authors are only paid afterwards.

Publishers pay authors the rights to publish a book.

Or you could put your feet up on your desk or coffee table, stay in your pajamas if you wanted to, go unshaven for days at a time, and have publishers pay you large amounts because readers would want to buy your books the moment they hit the shelves.

The real irony here, it turns out, is that it wasn't the publishers calling the questions: 75 percent of responding authors said they have never been asked for feedback from their publisher 7 percent said that publishers pay writers well 32 percent said that the prestige of having a deal with a traditional publisher was important to them... Read More

Romance Writers of America has one, and editors and publishers pay close attention to the winners.

Depending on the agreement and the vendor, publishers pay a minimum of 30 % of the list price to the distributor.

For openers, most publishers pay royalties twice a year on income that they may have received as long as nine months before.

Book royalties and book advances are the means by which publishers pay authors for their work.

Do mainstream publishers pay for reviews, buy up large amounts of table space at large book stores to squeeze out their competition, or take part in any of a number of things that would look less than scrupulous to the average bear?

That's why it's easy to know what other book publishers pay for print - on - demand book printing.

The traditional publishers pay for book production, but then expect the author to pay back those costs from his or her royalties.

Do they really believe we, the consumer public, don't know that publishers pay to get end - cap displays and those cardboard displays near the front of the stores?

When all of the major publishers pay six to nine months late, we're not talking about a mean accounts payable clerk.

On average, traditional publishers pay royalties of between 5 % and 12 % of the book's cover price.

And our digital lines and other publishers pay higher royalties when we don't have to pay an advance.

Can you understand I feel bad for writers who can't make a living wage because publishers pay them so little?