Sentences with phrase «publishers were interested in your book»

Five publishers were interested in your book, but only two of them met the deadline.

However, at first, no publisher was interested in the book, so Waller self - published his book, going from store to store, selling his books on consignment and offering buyers a money - back guarantee.

Not exact matches

We are the main publisher in the field, with over 50 titles ranging from issue briefs to lengthy books (see our guidelines for authors if you are interested in writing for us).

The book is the first by a major publisher with its exposure and interest to have a time - stamped digest recorded in the... Read more»

You don't have enough king James scripture verses in it for any Christian publisher to be interested in putting it out (I've talked to Christian agents about this, and they are as frustrated as the writers at how boxed in to rigid rules Christian books have to be) and that is a sad fact about book publishing today.

«Religious interest is growing in this country,» affirms Word Books publisher Jarrell McCracken, «but probably away from the established church and denominations.

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

Not only is Monville's story powerful and largely untold, it also hits a burgeoning market for book publishers, Kraybill said: the cross-section of evangelical spirituality and interest in all things Amish.

In 1949, four of the five best - selling nonfiction books — excluding books on canasta — were religious titles, and though independent publishers produced many of these books, the popular interest in religion benefited the denominational publishers as welIn 1949, four of the five best - selling nonfiction books — excluding books on canasta — were religious titles, and though independent publishers produced many of these books, the popular interest in religion benefited the denominational publishers as welin religion benefited the denominational publishers as well.

If you just want to skip to the awesome recipe the publisher so kindly let me share, you can head to the end of this post, but if you are interested in what else the book has to offer, stick around!

I've mentioned that book here so often, you can all be forgiven for assuming that Ms. Poppendieck and I are secretly related, or that I have some lucrative royalty deal with her publisher, but in truth, it's just an awesome book for anyone trying to wade through the byzantine mess that is our current national school lunch program and interested in ideas for fixing it.

-- Excerpted from the Preface (page v) Although I've attained a certain stature as a syndicated journalist, I must confess to being unable to interest a publisher in either of the two books I've completed.

It's High Noon Books division was established in 1984 as one of the early publishers of high interest / low level (Hi / Lo) books for struggling reaBooks division was established in 1984 as one of the early publishers of high interest / low level (Hi / Lo) books for struggling reabooks for struggling readers.

Posted on November 23, 2016 · Textbook publisher Cynthia Dunbar was defending her company's Mexican - American Heritage book in front of the State Board of Education last week when she made an interesting argument.

If you're ready to take the risk that your book won't be a big performer in the publisher's catalog, you won't find a more interesting or exciting business.

There's a popular belief among authors that if they self - publish and demonstrate that their books can generate huge sells, a traditional publisher will take an interest in their work.

Juergen Boos, Director of the Frankfurt Book Fair, said: «There is strong international interest in learning more about Canadian publishers, authors, culture and media.

And don't ever reject a small publisher who is interested in publishing your book when you find out they use print on demand.

You see, a book needs to come to life with its author knowing what audience is expected to read it, or else most publishers (and literary agents) won't be interested in it.

Obviously you know little about how the book business works, if you really think there's a conspiracy to silence your precious voice, or that publishers aren't interested in publishing great books that will make money.

Pointing out that «authors remain the only essential part of the creation of a book and it is in everyone's interests to ensure they can make a living», it tells publishers that «unfair contract terms, including reduced royalty rates, are a major part of the problem».

And yesterday, there was an interesting story in the New York Times about a problem with e-books: people can't see the book jacket when you're reading in a public place, which in the past has been free advertising for publishers (not to mention a means for self - expression).

I recall hearing back in the day from the Pendergrasts who ran Fictionwise that the publishers simply weren't interested in lowering e-book prices when books went to paperback, and it ended up with THEM having to chase down PUBLISHERS to get them to lowpublishers simply weren't interested in lowering e-book prices when books went to paperback, and it ended up with THEM having to chase down PUBLISHERS to get them to lowPUBLISHERS to get them to lower prices.

That agent and later a more high - powered one in New York were both unable to interest a publisher in the book.

Many people are still interested in a book deal with a NY or London publisher, but there are many hurdles to overcome as well as a lot of myths that surround the industry.

The best book publishers, and especially the best self publishers know that a net sales profit method is in the best interest of the author, and won't manipulate royalty percentages or profits.

If the publisher can convince them that they're likely to get more readers or sell more books (and the publisher will, by nature, be more interested in the latter proposition), they might jump on it, knowing that they're dealing with Scenario # 2.

The difference is: the traditional publisher's name is on the book (so reputation comes into play) and the publisher has invested money and will be interested in getting a return on the investment.

Apple has made deals with five publishers to have books available, but do you really think those deals are going to be in the user's interest?

More and more it seems traditional publishers are only interested in books capable of extremely high volume sales by authors with best sellers already on their resume.

On one front, this is essential material for the first - time author pursuing a traditional publishing deal, as publishers are well known for sticking quite rigidly to genre requirements, for the purposes of selling their products (our books) to the even more hide - bound book shops, who aren't interested in buying a book unless they know where to shelve it.

I get it — you are thrilled that a publisher (or anyone) is interested in your book.

I understand refusing to review books you're not interested in reading, but don't discriminate based on who is the publisher or the nature of the format.

But in public, I mostly see people advocating for the traditional publishing world who come across as mired in 20th thinking about publishing and selling books, ignorant of the self - publishing world, making sweeping assertions which they can't support, making the mistaken assumption that the writer's best interests are identical to the publisher's best interests, clearly unaware of how many traditionally - published writers (including bestsellers) are engaging in self - publishing (and comparing the experiences and numbers with their under - contract books), and / or contemptuous of writers and dismissive of readers.

And as I said above, I don't in any way dispute that commercial publishers are interested in self - published books that do well.

How to Land an Agent for a Self - Published Book (Jane Friedman): This is a must - read if you've self - published, but you're also interested in working with a traditional publisher.

We all know that the e-book market as it is currently structured is not designed in the best interests of book publishers.

Based on the widely implemented Atom Syndication Format, OPDS Catalogs have been developed since 2009 by a group of ebook developers, publishers, librarians, and booksellers interested in providing a lightweight, simple, and easy to use format for developing catalogs of digital books, magazines, and other content.

It'll be interesting to see if your publisher produces your book in both print and e-version.

I'm not interested in a book that is going to generate less than $ 100,000 in revenue unless the editor or publisher has a compelling vision for the book and / or the author.

In addition, the mere fact that a traditional publisher has chosen to publish a book helps establish that the book is being published «in the public interest» which is very important if any claims of invasion of privacy arisIn addition, the mere fact that a traditional publisher has chosen to publish a book helps establish that the book is being published «in the public interest» which is very important if any claims of invasion of privacy arisin the public interest» which is very important if any claims of invasion of privacy arise.

As a author / publisher if you are interested in joining us as your publishing partner, Pickawoowoo can guide your book's destiny with you at the helm.

«I was very interested in the information on authors going back to their publishers and getting the rights» to their out of print books in order to pursue publishing them electronically.

What will be interesting to see will be the innovations that develop for digital children's books, as publishers like Sourcebooks and iStoryTime continue the trend in creating new interactive features and make announcements about new projects.

It's interesting that some are calling for legal action and government intervention in this issue, but do we really anticipate a commercial society where book retailers are required to sell every title that comes along, and at whatever terms the publishers mandate?

The practice of rewarding people who were both interested in a title and also influential in book circles is something more publishers could easily replicate in other ways (outside of Klout or Twitter).

When I hear an agent or publisher say that about self - published books, I know they — intentionally or otherwise — are focused on something they shouldn't be focused on if they are interested in finding books to sell.

Poynter made the decision to print and market his first book on his own after realizing that no traditional publishers would be interested in his finished manuscript (Mother Earth News).

When I meet authors and publishers who are interested in growing their sales, I ask them this question: «What shelves to you want to see your book sitting on?»

A final major benefit of traditional publishing, and what I believe to be the most important, is the fact that, with a publisher, a writer has a team of experts in every aspect of book production — i.e., editing, copy editing, legal review, when necessary, cover design, formatting, marketing, and publicity — who work together with a common, vested interest in making a book the best representation of the author and the publishing house that it can be.