Not exact matches
These are journals that sport
fake impact factors, that promise a 1 - week peer
review, that
publish tons of papers that contain plagiarism, and that annoy researchers worldwide with doltish spam.»
As we reported last month, Elsevier is retracting 26 papers affected by
fake reviews; Ahmad Salar Elahi is corresponding author on 24 of them, including Khajehnezhad's now - retracted paper
published in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
If you keep up with indie
publishing news, you may have come across news of Amazon suing four companies that sell
fake, positive
reviews.
News stories included Amazon's
fake review lawsuit, three recent seven - figure
publishing deals for indies, the luck factor of
publishing, the reasoning behind Oyster's new online book store, and the traditionally
published author survey.
The decline overall in self -
published titles is welcome for obvious reasons * and, that individual self -
published writers are selling slightly more copies may indicate that legitimate marketing methods (that do not flood uninterested parties with unwelcome messages, that do reach target audiences and which do not contain pointless emphasis on
fake / purchased
reviews or bloated, meaningless «awards» rather than pertinent and honest content) are beginning to surface in this sub-culture.
In other cases, self -
published authors like John Locke and Stephen Leather pay people to leave positive
reviews or leave
fake reviews themselves.
Amazon has laid out five arbitration demands in a complaint filed with the American Arbitration Association (obtained by TechCrunch, see below), accusing the involved parties of offering services to boost the number of pages read in books, fraudulent customer
reviews, creating
fake user accounts to download e-books and inflate the numbers and other schemes to boost the amount of royalties authors and publishers were able to pull from Amazon's self -
publishing platform.
The idea of stealing another writer's words or trying to discredit them or falsifying
reviews or trying to have people write
fake reviews of my work sounds crazy to me, but I am guilty of highlighting the parts of the PW
review that I liked most about my most recent book; it was a mixed
review bc the reviewer thought the novel had too many coincidences / was too neatly wrapped up at the end, but that's one of my signatures, I think, now that I've written three books, two
published, and one in the works, so I'm actually proud of the strange kismet, sometimes magical occurrences that happen in my work because they also happen in my life, and that's what this whole post is about: about being true to oneself, which includes a moral code, a writers and human code of ethics.
Meanwhile,
publishing tongues were wagging this week in the wake of a NY Times article about the (apparently very lucrative) world of
fake online book
reviews:
Customers are captured through a variety of deceptive means — such as
fake «independent» websites which purport to
review all the self -
publishing options available to writers (but only compare the various Author Solutions...
Print This Post Filed Under: Digital Tagged With: Amazon, Apple, book business, digital
publishing roundup, digital transition, ebook sales,
fake ebook
reviews, Global Connect Network, Google, Ingram Content Group, Overdrive, Oyster, Smashwords
All
reviews submitted are
published (unless we think the
review is a
fake), even if it is a bad
review of someone who paid for a classified.
Earlier this month Denham told a UK parliamentary committee that's also running an investigation into
fake news that she hoped to
publish her
review of digital political ad targeting this May.