Sentences with phrase «publishing side just»

Not exact matches

For example, Moses Stuart of Andover Seminary in Massachusetts (who was sympathetic to the eventual emancipation of American slaves, but was against abolition), published a tract in which he pointed to Ephesians 6 and other biblical texts to argue that while slaves should be treated fairly by their owners, abolitionists just didn't have Scripture on their side and «must give up the New Testament authority, or abandon the fiery course which they are pursuing.»

Just as a side note: One of the things I learned through the Tony Jones narrative was that he was allowed to publish and promote his story online, but she was advised not to.

An Opta analysis of the Premier League season so far, published by the Daily Mail, has revealed just which players are involved in the highest proportion of their side's goals.

Both parties have just published the negotiating document on which they finally agreed; seven pages of policy give - and - take which saw both sides relinquish some proposals that, if you listened to them in the campaign, you would have thought were imprinted on their very hearts.

Breast cancer patients who have radiotherapy targeted at the original tumour site experience fewer side effects five years after treatment than those who have whole breast radiotherapy, and their cancer is just as unlikely to return, according to trial results published in The Lancet.

A study published today as the lead article in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery determined that after lower extremity joint replacement surgery a mobile compression device was just as effective as blood thinners in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but without negative side effects including bleeding complications.

Linda, you mentioned that you just became a certified yoga teacher where you spent thirty - one days with eighteen hours a day of focusing on yoga and obviously exercise and the things that go with yoga, the meditative side of things, right in the middle of being a powerful consultant and right before publishing a book.

A study published in Phytotherapy Research pitted Prozac against a daily turmeric regimen, and you can probably already guess what they discovered: turmeric was just as effective at managing depression, and not a single patient taking turmeric complained of side effects.

I happened to see her add on the right side of her page about this new e-book she had just published.

Now this silly idea that the writing process has anything at all to do with quality of the work has been around in publishing for just over 100 years now, pushed mostly by the literature side and the college professors.

Since I made the decision to part ways from the traditional path for good a few months ago (mutual goodwill on both sides with my former agent — I'm just much happier with the pace and full control of self publishing), I guess I hadn't thought about the fact that I'm free of that restriction now.

As an interesting side note, the Guardian just did a report that revealed how much published authors really make.

As we grew in our craft and became published writers, not just aspiring writers, of necessity, we got more serious about the business side of writing.

He comes off as though the publishing industry has screwed him over and now he's just railing against them, trying to get everyone on to their side.

With so much weight and power shifting from traditional publishing to the independent side of things, book sales just aren't tabulated the way they once were.

Just a quick note for those writers out there who'd like to learn a little more about the craft of writing or the business side of self - publishing.

They have an amazing bed - side manner to hold the hands of the crazy stressed out newbie author just trying to finish the long journey of writing and publishing their first book.

I did notice that some traditionally published series are listed without numbers at all, so that requirement seems to just be on the self published side of BN.

I would add on the side of traditional publishing that 1) It is easier to get national publicity because producers give more weight to a traditionally published book, particularly from a larger house (though some self - published authors certainly do get national publicity as well — it's just harder, in general and 2) a traditional publisher is generally going to bring a great deal of experience to the table — from improving the cover or title to layout and design.

If you want to search the site, you can find a Search bar on the side of the Blog as well as in the Footer of this page, or just go to Google and type it «the creative penn + how to self - publish» or whatever you are looking for.

Margaret Harrison [00:02:07] Oh thanks, well so, yeah, I've worked my whole career in publishing and I started out on the ebook side working for OverDrive, a major distributor of ebooks at public libraries, and focusing on ebooks, so much of it is about the metadata, not just getting books into channels but also making sure those books, as Justine said, can be discoverable, can be found, and so I started spending a lot more of my time on metadata, and I'm a curious person so I got to know a lot and here I am

Don't get me wrong, that filtering process led to a lot of great work getting published over the years, and even made a lot of that work better than it would have been otherwise, but I would guess that for every success story of that kind there are just as many books that went through the wood - chipper of legacy publishing and came out the other side half the product it once was.

When it seemed like these newfangled ebooks were actually gaining popularity, both sides became just as divided on where digital fit in the publishing clubhouse.

Most collections of literary letters are published posthumously and, more often than not, include just the one - sided narrative of a single writer.

However, it is no problem for a single author to overcome such a restriction and publish, let's say, first 20 titles as the «placeholders» (books that have a few pages, two per month, just to reach the required number)... It is much more wiser to not start such a spiral, because, as every conflict, it consumes resources on both sides of the ghetto wall you propose to build.

I could traditionally publish a little on the side or self - publish a little on the side... or I could just go for broke.

While a number of authors have embraced the technology side of self - publishing, there will always be authors who just want to write the book and have someone else handle the upload and sales.

I'm a multi-published, award - winning author represented on both sides of the Atlantic by HarperCollins, Ellora» Cave and Totally Bound, I also self - publish my own work (ebooks) enjoying the freedom of not just of the writing but also the marketing.

It just has the unfortunate side effect of meaning that we don't have an accurate picture of how large the ebook universe is, nor of how much of it is self - published.

If you want to search the site, you can find a Search bar on the side of the Blog, or just go to Google and type it «the creative penn + how to self - publish» or whatever you are looking for.

Today, we're going to look at the traditional publishing side of things and explore advances, royalty rates, and just how you can make a living as a writer.

The reason traditionally published authors & the traditional publishing side has such disdain for self - publishing is not because anyone & everyone CAN do it, but because MOST of the ones who DO IT have self - published either unpublishable garbage OR have taken a manuscript with great potential & published it without decent editing & revision (both of which seriously hinder the enjoyment of the reading audience - not an issue if you're a hobby writer who just wants to entertain family & friends, but a serious issue for anyone who thinks that that sort of thing can hold its own against carefully revised & edited work).

Since the self - publishing paradigm addresses mostly just the ebook side, we'll stick with that.

There are crappy books published on the traditional side as well, so you'll be competing with «crappy books» just by putting your pen to paper and writing, editing and attempting to publish.

On the flip side, many authors choose to self publish because it just makes sense: they will get their book out faster and can make more money per copy sold.

But maybe that's just the perfectionist side of me coming out — most self published books I've seen don't do that and quite a lot of traditionally published ones don't either.

The animation business and the publishing business are not exactly mirroring the pattern, but just for data-wise, currently, on the animation side, after five years — starting in 2008 - 9 — the anime side our business revenue-wise I think this year we may have 50 % coming from digital.

And I am just curious, as an author who is really in the thick of both sides of the publishing world right now, what do you think about the potential for the self pubbed kids market in 2014?

It can be difficult to know which supplements, especially on the equine side, meet label claim, so it is important to seek out products backed by published research, not just testimonials, and manufactured by companies that you trust.

Daybreak develops and publishes games including H1Z1 and its former open - world survival side Just Survive, Planetside 2, DC Universe Online, Everquest, and Everquest 2.

The move came from a desire to get back to working more closely with development teams and not just supporting them from the publishing side.

Also included were a selection of short writings by Judd both from his reviews written for Arts magazine and later, longer essays, including, «Black, White, and Gray», published in Arts in March 1964, in which Judd wrote: «Things that exist, exist, and everything is on their side... Everything is equal, just existing, and the values and interests they have are only adventitious.»

Not just sharing the visual communication side of design, she also loves to publish interior design inspiration.

As a side note, I have no idea why you would use preliminary findings from BEST when they just published their full results, nor do I know why you would use a linear comparison between two points.

I recommend that you retract your claims and rethink your own motivation in publishing such a one - sided screed, quoting what is provably a politically - motivated group (just look at the web domain registration information for your source!)

«Now it's just up to us to make sure that we're updating and continuing to publish updates on the software side.»