During all that time, traditional
publishing was the only game in town, for all practical purposes.
well, they seem to think that traditional
publishing is the only game in town, when they decided it was time to establish their intellectual superiority.
When traditional
publishing was the only game in town, writers grew up dreaming that someday they would be published by a traditional publisher.
They've turned a blind eye to the creative ways of reporting royalties because legacy
publishing was the only game in town.
In other words, could this have happened when traditional
publishing was the only game in town?
You know the first thing they taught me as an aspiring writer when traditional
publishing was the ONLY game in town?
In 2002, when bestselling author Barry Eisler started out, legacy
publishing was the only game in town.
Not exact matches
JAMIE LERUE: At this moment
in history, with this explosion of self -
publishing and independent
publishing, suddenly the big five aren't the
only game in town.
Traditional
publishing used to
be the
only game in town for authors who wanted a fair shake financially.
And
in traditional
publishing for the last sixty - plus years, the
only game in town was to form a partnership through a contract with an established publisher to get your work to readers.
I
am not
published by Macmillan but plenty of my friends and colleagues
are and they do not deserve their books
being mucked about with while Amazon asserts itself as the
only game in town or Macmillan digs
in over how many dollars an ebook needs to cost.
Traditional
publishing in the last half of the 20th century did a fine job of pushing the belief system that they
were the
only game in town.