Punitive damages are also available in many jurisdictions to
punish defendants in those cases involving particularly egregious conduct which demonstrates a reckless or wanton disregard for the safety of the public.
Not exact matches
As such, they hold a crucial place
in the Canadian legal system as they enable our courts to go beyond regular awards of damages stemming from a
case and to effectively «
punish»
defendants for bad behaviour.
In the US the damages regime is very different: Juries hear the
case and set damages, which can then be trebled by the judge, if he or she considers the
Defendant should be
punished.
How to Allege Punitive Damages and the Court's Ruling Punitive damages are allowed
in New Mexico accident
cases as a way for the jury to
punish a
defendant for conduct that is so excessive or abhorrent that it must be condemned above and beyond what is required to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
In its 1906 ruling in the case of State v. Koch, our Montana State Supreme Court ruled that «the jury has power to disregard the law as declared and acquit the defendant, however convincing the evidence may be, and that the court or judge has no power to punish them for such conduct.&raqu
In its 1906 ruling
in the case of State v. Koch, our Montana State Supreme Court ruled that «the jury has power to disregard the law as declared and acquit the defendant, however convincing the evidence may be, and that the court or judge has no power to punish them for such conduct.&raqu
in the
case of State v. Koch, our Montana State Supreme Court ruled that «the jury has power to disregard the law as declared and acquit the
defendant, however convincing the evidence may be, and that the court or judge has no power to
punish them for such conduct.»
Punitive damages are designed to
punish the
defendant and act as a deterrent, but are rarely awarded
in personal injury
cases.
In many
cases, juries may also assess punitive damages as a means to
punish the
defendant health care providers to prevent similar future negligence.
However,
in some
cases, juries and courts can award what are called «punitive damages,» which are designed to
punish defendants who have behaved recklessly or intentionally against the public's interest.
Finally, punitive damages are warranted
in some personal injury
cases, and, rather than being meant to make the plaintiff whole again, punitive damages are meant to
punish the
defendant for particularly willful or negligent behavior, deterring this type of behavior
in the future.
Punitive damages: Awarded
in a small percentage of
cases, punitive damages are designed to
punish the
defendant for behavior that is extremely harmful, such as driving drunk or talking on a cellphone while driving.
[ii] Thus,
in assessing the putative excessiveness of punitive damages
in a given
case, a court must scrutinize whether a jury is
punishing a
defendant an amount of punitive damages that considers the harms actually suffered by strangers to the litigation.
They are meant to
punish the
defendant in exceptional
cases where the
defendant's conduct has been «malicious, oppressive and high - handed» and «represents a marked departure from the ordinary standards of decent behaviour», see Whiten, at para. 36.