It also asked if you could be persecuted (sure, from non-police), or can you declare yourself publicly to be a communist (sure, you can do whatever you want), when what the question really is about is can you legally do so without being
punished by the force of law.
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived
of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted
by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time
by a court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted
of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty for it is prescribed in a written
law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11)
of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from
punishing a person for contempt
of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the contempt is not defined in a written
law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts
of record and shall have the power to commit for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court
of record immediately before the coming into
force of this constitution.
And so, in this sense, it is said that, whereas persons who had been guilty
of the offences mentioned in the oath were,
by the
laws then in
force, only liable to be
punished with death and confiscation
of all their property, they are,
by a
law passed since these offences were committed, made liable to the enormous additional punishment
of being deprived
of the right to practise
law!