One of the most important legal doctrines is that a person can not be
punished for contempt of court for failing to do something that the person being held in contempt of court does not have the ability to do.
If you do not, you can be
punished for contempt of court and the court may be required to draw legal conclusions from your behaviour that will be bad for your case.
And even if the President could be
punished for contempt, if he thinks intervening will result in the annihilation of the human race in a thermonuclear war, he will not issue the orders.
However, if the judge must
punish you for contempt of court, you may be fined, sentenced to jail or made to do something like community service.
If the House of Representatives possessed no authority to
punish for contempt, the initiating process issued in the assertion of that authority must have been illegal; there was a want of jurisdiction to justify it.
Not exact matches
Therefore they can not endure what even to them seems a contradiction, and which as reflected from the world around them appears much more glaring, that to be concerned
for one's own soul and to want to be spirit is a waste of time, yes, an inexcusable waste of time, which ought if possible to be punishable by law, at all events is
punished by
contempt and ridicule as a sort of treason against men, as a froward madness which crazily fills up time with nothing.
But the NCAA's
contempt for its own players is a central theme in everything it does, starting with not paying them and continuing through how it
punishes violations of its rules.
Article 14 (1) Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of his personal liberty except in the following cases and in accordance with procedure permitted by law; Article 19 (1) A person charged with a criminal offence shall be given a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court; Article 19 (11) No person shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence is defined and the penalty
for it is prescribed in a written law; Article 19 (12) Clause (11) of this article shall not prevent a Superior Court from
punishing a person
for contempt of itself notwithstanding that the act or omission constitution the
contempt is not defined in a written law and the penalty is not so prescribed; and Article 126 (2) The Superior Courts shall be superior courts of record and shall have the power to commit
for contempt to themselves and all such powers as were vested in a court of record immediately before the coming into force of this constitution.
If there is a conviction, the conduct can not be
punished as a
contempt and, if
punished as a
contempt, there can be no conviction
for the new offence.
Instead, there's talk that judges will
punish local defenders
for turning down cases by holding them in
contempt.
Judges do not like to
punish people
for contempt of court.
In all cases of criminal
contempt arising under the provisions of this act, the accused, upon conviction, shall be
punished by fine or imprisonment or both; Provided however, that in case the accused is a natural person the fine to be paid shall not exceed the sum of $ 1,000, nor shall impriSonment exceed the term of six months; Provided further, That in any such proceeding
for criminal
contempt, at the discretion of the judge, the accused may be tried with or without a jury; Provided further, however, That in the event such proceeding
for criminal
contempt be tried before a judge without a jury and the sentence of the court on conviction is a fine in excess of the sum of $ 300 or imprisonment in excess of forty five days, the accused in said proceeding upon demand therefor, shall be entitled to a trial de novo before a jury, which shall conform as near as may be to the practice in other criminal cases.
In a case reported at 1970 Times 12 February, he dodged two law books thrown at him by a litigant upset at his ruling but declined to
punish the woman
for contempt.
Where a litigant or lawyer is
punished for out - of - court conduct, the
contempt is «indirect.»
The district courts shall have equity powers only to the extent necessary to enforce the aforementioned sections, including the power to appoint receivers, grant injunctions and issue restraining orders as justice and equity may require and
for punishing civil
contempt of orders, rulings and decrees made or pronounced in the exercise of this jurisdiction.
«We hold that the circuit court had the duty and authority, in the first instance, to determine the validity of the ordinance, and, until the decision of the circuit court is reversed
for error by orderly review, either by the circuit court or a higher court, the orders of the circuit court based on its decision are to be respected, and disobedience of them is
contempt of its lawful authority, to be
punished.
And be it further enacted, That all the said courts of the United States shall have power to grant new trials, in cases where there has been a trial by jury
for reasons
for which new trials have usually been granted in the courts of law; and shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths or affirmations, and to
punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all
contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same; and to make and establish all necessary rules
for the orderly conducting business in the said courts, provided such rules are not repugnant to the laws of the United States.
I feel very
contempt for abusive parents who are so self centered they sacrifice their children to
punish the other parent.