From where Washington State politicians and Petrilli sit, the Obama Administration's decision is «
punishing schools and educators» because the state will now have to fall back on No Child's Adequate Yearly Progress accountability provision, as well as the aspirational provision that states must ensure that all kids are proficient in reading, math, and science.
Not exact matches
Join Howie Hawkins
and Brian Jones at the New Possibilities for Public Education: Rally for Kids
and Schools as they stand with educators and parents dedicated to saving public schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
Schools as they stand with
educators and parents dedicated to saving public
schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
schools and talk about how to fight back against the test
and punish regime rampant in
schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
schools, the privatization of education,
and the attacks against teachers
Accountability policies are intended to promote effective instruction
and student learning by rewarding effective
educators and schools while
punishing low performing ones.
The new initiative, called «Excellent
Educators for All,» aims to bring states into compliance with a teacher equity mandate in the No Child Left Behind Act, the George W. Bush - era law that requires states to reward
and punish schools based on standardized test scores.
She argues that federal programs such as George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind
and Barack Obama's Race to the Top set unreasonable targets for American students,
punish schools,
and result in teachers being fired if their students underperform, unfairly branding those
educators as failures.
Numerous provisions contained in S. 1177 represent a huge step forward from current legislation: the elimination of adequate yearly progress
and the 100 percent proficiency requirements, tempering the test -
and -
punish provisions of No Child Left Behind; the continued requirement of disaggregated subgroup data; removal of the unworkable
school turnaround models required under the School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school turnaround models required under the
School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
School Improvement Grant
and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term
school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high
school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «
School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support,
and retention of effective principals
and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leaders in high - need
schools;
and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction
and mentoring programs that are designed to improve
school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leadership
and provide opportunities for mentor principals
and other
educators who are experienced
and effective.
Does the fear of
punishing a
school or a teacher for poor test scores motivate institutions
and educators to perform better?
And educators know that students are more than a test score, so let educators teach and put an end the toxic practice of punishing students, schools and educators based on test results.&raq
And educators know that students are more than a test score, so let
educators teach
and put an end the toxic practice of punishing students, schools and educators based on test results.&raq
and put an end the toxic practice of
punishing students,
schools and educators based on test results.&raq
and educators based on test results.»
Rather than treat students
and parents with the respect
and support the comes with serving as an
educator, the magnet
school's principals were engaged an effort to
punish students who had been opted out of the SBAC testing.
Advance Illinois
and its partners are seeking an accountability system that is: Fair: Fair for all
schools no matter the characteristics of the student body Clear: Simple
and understandable for parents
and educators Supportive: Intervenes
and provides resources to
schools with needs instead of simply
punishing them