Not exact matches
As a result of the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1998 Abbott v. Burke ruling, per -
pupil spending in some of the state's
poorest districts, known as the Abbott
districts, increased more
than 41 percent from 1996 to 2003.
A negative score means that, on average, students in property -
poor districts actually receive more state and local funding per
pupil than students in more affluent areas do.
A study of 49 states by The Education Trust found that school
districts with high numbers of low - income and minority students receive substantially less state and local money per
pupil than school
districts with few
poor and minority children.
Utah is one of only 10 states that have negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, students in property -
poor districts actually receive more funding per
pupil than students living in wealthy areas.
After running the numbers, we found that the
poorest districts in California actually receive $ 620 less per
pupil than the wealthiest
districts.
In 23 states, state and local governments are together spending less per
pupil in the
poorest school
districts than they are in the most affluent school
districts, putting the children in these low - income, high - need schools at an even further disadvantage.
Carroll County receives more in per -
pupil state aid
than most
districts, because of a formula that favors
poorer districts, and all of the virtual academy's students are counted as Carroll students, regardless of where they live.
In 23 states, students in the
poorest districts receive fewer dollars per
pupil than students in wealthier
districts.