Sentences with phrase «pupils eligible for free school meals compared»

The programme was found to have a differential effect for pupils eligible for free school meals compared to their peers.

At the age of 11, the gap was 16.8 % but rose to 26.2 % at 16 when exam results of pupils eligible for free school meals compared with those not eligible.

Not exact matches

The same analysis also found that pupils from poorer backgrounds who performed just as well as their more well off peers were still less likely to attend grammars, with 66 per cent of children who achieve level five in both English and Maths at Key Stage 2 who are not eligible for free school meals going to a grammar school compared with 40 per cent of similarly high achieving children who are eligible for free school meals.

The latest data shows that 59 per cent of pupils who are eligible for free school meals achieved the expected standard in maths by the end of primary school, compared to over three - quarters (78 per cent) of all other pupils.

The EPI's analysis used data from from inspections that took place from 2005/06 to 2014/15 and found that secondary schools with up to five per cent of pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) are over three times as likely to be rated «outstanding» as schools with at least 23 per cent FSM (48 per cent compared with 14 per cent).

GCSE results, including for pupils eligible for free school meals and those with special educational needs, improved at a faster rate in 2009 - 2011 compared with the results in similar schools.

Research by the Sutton Trust in 2014 showed that pupils eligible for free school meals who scored in the top 10 per cent nationally at the end of primary school were significantly less likely to be entered for the EBacc, compared to their wealthier peers who achieved the same level aged 11.

GCSE results, including for pupils eligible for free school meals and those with special educational needs, improved at a faster rate 2009 - 2011 compared with the results in similar schools.

Senior Labour MP Lucy Powell published figures showing the capital had the biggest gap between the number of pupils at grammars eligible for free school meals compared with the figure for the broader school population.

The programme appeared to have a different impact on pupils eligible for and claiming free school meals compared to their peers.

In 2017, over two thirds (68 per cent) of pupils eligible for free school meals met the expected standard in phonics, compared to 83 per cent of all other pupils.

[1] 2.5 % of pupils who entered grammars in 2015/16 are eligible for free school meals compared to 14.1 % nationally, whereas 11 % of pupils who entered grammar school are likely to have come from prep schools, compared to around 6.5 % nationally.

Of those aged 11 - 16, 17 % of pupils who are eligible for free school meals (FSM) have received private tuition at some point in their schooling, compared with 26 % of students who do not receive FSM.

Figures in October showed 2.8 % of grammar pupils are eligible for free school meals compared with 13.4 % in non-selective schools.

The researchers compared pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) in England with disadvantaged pupils in other countries using PISA's economic, social and cultural status index.

Figures show 2.8 % of grammar pupils are eligible for free school meals compared with 13.4 % in non-selective schools.

Last year just 66 % of those known to be eligible for free school meals reached the expected level in English and maths, compared with 82 % of all other pupils.

It warns that these schools admit around 9.4 % of pupils eligible for Free School Meals (FSM)- a key measure of poverty, compared to 17.2 % attending the average state sSchool Meals (FSM)- a key measure of poverty, compared to 17.2 % attending the average state schoolschool.

The figures show only 52 % of children eligible for free school meals reached the expected standard, compared with 70 % of all other pupils and 67 % of pupils overall.

This compares to just over a quarter (27 %) of wealthier pupils (not eligible for Free School Meals).

In Kent, just 27 % of pupils eligible for free school meals get five good GCSEs, compared with 45 % in London.

For example, just 42 per cent of year 1 pupils with SEN achieved the expected standard this year, compared to 86 per cent of those with no identified SEN, while 69 per cent of pupils in the same cohort eligible for free school meals achieved the standard, compared to 83 per cent of other pupiFor example, just 42 per cent of year 1 pupils with SEN achieved the expected standard this year, compared to 86 per cent of those with no identified SEN, while 69 per cent of pupils in the same cohort eligible for free school meals achieved the standard, compared to 83 per cent of other pupifor free school meals achieved the standard, compared to 83 per cent of other pupils.

Just under half of all children eligible for free school meals (FSM) are not school - ready by the time they start primary school, compared with just over a quarter of wealthier pupils.