Sentences with phrase «pure logic does»

Sometimes pure logic doesn't work.

Not exact matches

I tell you the truth, the purest souls of this life will not do good to avoid the punishment of Hell or gain the reward of Heaven, but for the sake of good as logic in society.

It is as if they don't realize that pure logic, because their thinking is so clouded by the idea that a person must be a genetically pure White, blonde hair, blue eyed, with not much color in you skin tone, in order to be any good.

Even when an argument is won on pure logical grounds others are not necessarily going to be convinced, for logic does not equal plausibility and because pure logic always has its own inherent bias that makes people suspicious.

The reasons for accepting it do not form the kind of deductive proof we require in logic or pure mathematics, but they resemble the arguments used in a court of law to establish innocence or culpability.

This is the tradition which is reborn and renewed in primitive Christianity and the New Testament, but unlike Buddhism, Christianity never realized a pure thinking or pure logic incorporating its deepest ground, or did not do so until the full advent of the modern world.

Brilliant absolutely brilliant... I am a pure fan because I don't insult but only use reasoned argument... you lot are just uneducated and unintelligent so I don't have to try to address your criticisms and can wantonly ignore my own incoherent logic....

Yes 4th is a major achievement and its not to be sniffed at, Yes the FA cup is a worthy trophy and it should not be downgraded but what we really need to do is win the EPL and also the CL and to do that its pure logic to suggest that we need to buy in some players that will improve the current team.

Dear Justin Most of your posts sound very logical but does pure logic apply to trading, i wonder, for trading has an element of gambling to some degree.

Do all those marks belong to logic, «pure» painting, Pattern and Decoration, or the cartoon brushwork of Pop Art?

Are you claiming there is no logic in that conclusion??! if so then your so called «pure» logic does not seem very practical.

Where does anyone nowadays look to find pure objective truth — i.e., truth according to the time - honored and duty - worn universally agreed upon rules of logic that have been argued by humanity's greatest minds during hard times over the ages?

If therefore the student in our laws hath formed both his sentiments and style, by perusal and imitation of the purest classical writers, among whom the historians and orators will best deserve his regard; if he can reason with precision, and separate argument from fallacy, by the clear simple rules of pure unsophisticated logic; if he can fix his attention, and steadily pursue truth through any the most intricate deduction, by the use of mathematical demonstrations; if he has enlarged his conceptions of nature and art, by a view of the several branches of genuine, experimental, philosophy; if he has impressed on his mind the sound maxims of the law of nature, the best and most authentic foundation of human laws; if, lastly, he has contemplated those maxims reduced to a practical system in the laws of imperial Rome; if he has done this, or any part of it, (though all may be easily done under as able instructors as ever graced any feats of learning) a student thus qualified may enter upon the study of the law with incredible advantage and reputation.