Sentences with phrase «pure reason»
"Pure reason" refers to using logic and rationality without any influence from personal opinions, emotions, or experiences. It means making decisions or forming opinions solely based on logical thinking and objective analysis. Full definition
He may not deny to humanity the ability to be responsive beyond the categories of pure reason and to reach beyond ourselves toward the open and endless truth of being.
firstthings.com
Theology based on pure reason must in point of fact convince men universally.
Given agreement on this body of religiously important beliefs understood as the product of pure reason or common sense, the theological debates centered on the relation of Christian faith to these beliefs.
Either Christianity was to be rejected outright or its moral and intellectual claims were seen as the fruit of pure reason alone.
This has been a subject for discussion ever since the publication of Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason in 1781.
He writes, «The impasse into which Protestant theology has come through its efforts to give significance to the resurrection tradition shows that the dogma of pure reason does not have sufficient resources to give Protestantism that kind of knowledge of Christian origins that its life and doctrine require.»
Although proud of having read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason at the age of 13, Einstein, in all appearance, never reflected on a central claim made in that book.
Since pure reason is of itself too weak to discover Truth it needs to be aided by the written record of faith.
The Critique of Pure Reason describes the process by which subjective data pass into the appearance of an objective world....
Novikov did what theoretical physicists do when confronted with situations that are impossible to test in the laboratory: he used pure reasoning...
Based on his own pure reasoning, for instance, he declared that it was wrong to use someone for your own ends and that it was right to act only according to principles that everyone could follow.
In this film, OH Krill, Brian Allan and James Earnshaw come together to unlock the mystery, and for the first time definitively explain this enigmatic realm of hidden wisdom, exploring the mysticism of a deeper reality that extends beyond pure reason and the physical sciences, the «inner» nature to all things.
Human does not know its potential, it has no real motivation nor a natural pure reason.
In proximity to When the Night Comes, 2014, a faux air vent high on the wall which references Tarkovsky's cult 1972 film Solaris, they direct us towards the idea of the ineffable in much the same way Dürer's engraving has been interpreted as a statement about the primacy of the imagination over pure reason.
Karen David is interviewed about her practice and solo show, «Pure Reason Tint of Violet», with VITRINE on Bermondsey Square.
Of course, the subtext of this search for essentialist influence is often the stricture that such bias shouldn't exist, that there exists a place of pure reason unsullied by personality and this is where judges should dwell.
I believe that even very tiny slivers of truth are of the utmost value if we seek for pure reasons and I believe that truth can be found in many places.
Science could not rely on pure reason to generate theories, still less on Aristotle's «logically necessary» conclusions.
It is pure reason in the absence of doctrine and it's attendant sidekick — dogma.
The problem, for Aristophanes, is that there's no argument against incest from the point of view of pure reason that works on the individual level.
They advocate education and pure reason.
Were nothing left but pure reason, it wouldn't be life.
Kant's distinction between practical and pure reason and the priority he ascribed to the former has deeply influenced modern theology.
The doctrine of the Eucharist is among the most sublime of the mysteries of faith whereas metaphysics holds the foundational place in the realm of pure reason.
Pure reason and exhortation are not meaningful by themselves.
Kant had found no access to God through the utilization of pure reason, shifting instead to a moral route through the utilization of «practical reason.»
This understanding of the limited scope of scientific method had been generally accepted since Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781); but in nineteenth - century evolutionary parlance it took on the specific meaning that «all beginnings and endings are lost in mystery,» a phrase that became commonplace in the sciences and social sciences as a way of dismissing or circumventing probing questions that sought to assess the larger implications or consequences of scientific analysis.
It also suggests that while ICant rejected the ontological argument as a proof of God's existence, he affirmed this view of its significance when be established the concept of the ens realissimum as one of the ideas of pure reason.
Ivan adds in the thread: «It's an instructive exaggeration to say that the whole of Hegel's philosophy springs from a desire to properly resolve Kant's 3rd antinomy in the Critique of Pure Reason.»
Pure reason is not satisfying for me, so I extend to believing there is no god.
His desertion of experience in favor of «pure reason» thus sets Kant in opposition to both Tradition and Radical Contingency.
Kant then solved the start - up problem his own way; in a procedure that is roasted by diverse modern critics (including Traditional natural lawyers) he ascended to a «pure reason» that is detached from the data of sense.
The properly theological and revelatory sense of Scripture, which was always an essential part of traditional exegesis, could never be considered as «religion within the confines of pure reason» and was therefore unacceptable.