For Maryland it is a dual
purpose document a disclosure and disclaimer statement.
Not exact matches
Just as Judge Cahill says, the issue for
disclosure is not whether a
document is a public or private e-mail but «the content and
purpose of the
document.»
Generally, a person may not procure a consumer report, or cause a consumer report to be procured, for employment
purposes with respect to any consumer, unless a clear and conspicuous
disclosure has been made in writing to the consumer at any time before the report is procured or caused to be procured, in a
document that consists solely of the
disclosure, that a consumer report may be obtained for employment
purposes.
The
purpose behind these guidelines is to promote (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable
disclosure in reports and
documents that the Trust files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Funds; (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rule and regulations; (iv) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Trust Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Trust Code; and (v) accountability for adherence to the Trust Code.
129 In the third place, as regards the argument that the
disclosure of
documents relating to the ACTA could only have reinforced the public interest with regard to international relations and avoid controversy arising from the leaked publication of certain proposals, it should be noted that, while it is true that the
purpose of Regulation No 1049/2001 is to ensure maximum transparency by giving the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to
documents of the European Union (recital 4 of the regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions to the right of access to protect certain public or private interests, and in the present case, the public interest as regards international relations.
That provision requires the Commission to refuse access to a
document «where
disclosure would undermine the protection of the
purpose of inspections, investigations and audits, unless there is an overriding public interest in
disclosure.»
It is in practice effectively impossible to argue for the existence of an overriding public interest for the
purposes of justifying
disclosure when the contents of the
documents are not known.
Taylor Wessing refused on three grounds: the
documents would not be disclosable under Bahamian law and were protected by privilege under English law; disproportionate effort on their part would be required to inspect the
documents; and the
purpose of the SAR was to obtain
disclosure for the sake of litigation.
To counterbalance this broad
disclosure obligation, attorney — client privilege also has a vast reach as soon as
documents are prepared for the
purpose of providing legal advice and the attorney — client privilege can also be claimed by in - house legal departments.
He relied on the Court of Appeal decision in Clibbery v Allen and submitted that financial and other personal information, when disclosed pursuant to the duty to give full
disclosure, must not be reported when referred to at a hearing because of the existence of an implied undertaking not to use such
documents for any
purpose other than for the proceedings.
The decision re-affirms that such
documents are not covered by litigation privilege and protected from
disclosure unless it is proved that the dominant
purpose for their creation was in contemplation of litigation.
In the cases I reviewed here, every official in the justice system failed the test — a governing body of the legal profession that released
documents to the police without a warrant, a judge who granted a wiretap authorization with a general warrant to search mobile devices without limitation other than a temporal one and a Crown attorney who released privileged information after presumptively reviewing it for
disclosure purposes under the Stinchcombe regime.
The impact of the invasion of a litigant's right to privacy and confidentiality which the obligation to give
disclosure constitutes is mitigated to some extent by CPR Part 31.22, which provides that where a
document has been disclosed to a party, that party may only use the
document for the
purpose of the proceedings in which it is disclosed, except where:
Not only are such platforms commonly used for
disclosure purposes, but they are essential tools for allowing parties to manage
document review.
The bank did not do its due diligence by properly
documenting the
purposes for which the information was disclosed, and failed to undertake demonstrable steps to ensure the
disclosure was reasonable.
Now, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada recently found that in order to properly rely on the s. 7 (3)(h. 2) exemption it is essential that an organization
document the
purpose for which personal information is disclosed and exercise due diligence to ensure that the
disclosure is reasonable under the circumstances.
While including all
disclosures within the accounting would provide more information to individuals about to whom their information has been disclosed, we believe that
documenting all
disclosures made for treatment, payment, and health care operations
purposes would be unduly burdensome on entities and would result in accountings so voluminous as to be of questionable value.
In § 164.508 (b)(3), we also permit covered entities to combine an authorization for the use or
disclosure of protected health information created for
purposes of research including treatment of individuals with certain other
documents.
Second, authorizations for the use or
disclosure of psychotherapy notes for multiple
purposes may be combined in a single
document, but may not be combined with authorizations for the use or
disclosure of other protected health information.
The mediator can often facilitate the voluntary
disclosure of
documents and information needed for the
purposes of mediation.
62 The answer to the second question should therefore be that Article 9 of the directive is to be interpreted as meaning that the activities referred to at points (a) to (d) of the first question, relating to data from
documents which are in the public domain under national legislation, must be considered as activities involving the processing of personal data carried out «solely for journalistic
purposes», within the meaning of that provision, if the sole object of those activities is the
disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas.
The extra items included on a
disclosure form make it harder for the prospective employee to understand the main
purpose of the
document, but it could also violate the FCRA.
A
disclosure is a legal
document that a seller is required to sign when listing their home for the
purpose of disclosing any major physical defects in the house that they are aware of, as well as the presence of lead - based paint, radon, or other potentially hazardous materials, conditions, or contaminants.