One of the basic purposes in enacting the OLA was to provide protection to occupiers who allow persons to come on to their premises for
the purpose of recreational activities.
Not exact matches
Also banned: instructions on «on how to make or use weapons if the goal is to injure or kill people,» unless there is «clear context that the content is for an alternative
purpose (for example, shared as part
of recreational self - defense
activities, training by a country's military, commercial video games, or news coverage).»
School districts in some states, including all five surveyed, may have additional protection under «
recreational use» statutes, which offer immunity from certain claims against landowners who open their property to the public for
recreational use.10 In states with broad
recreational use statutes, such as Indiana, opening school kitchen facilities could be considered a protected
activity under the law, depending on the circumstances
of the use and other factors.11 However, in Massachusetts, protection for
recreational activities extends only to
purposes that are «scientific, educational, environmental, ecological, research, religious, or charitable,» 12 so the state's statute might not apply when districts allow for - profit groups to use school kitchens.
The
purposes of the Library program are to enrich formal education, meet the informational needs
of students and staff, encourage reading as a
recreational activity, and foster independent learning.
The
purpose of the English Surf School Scheme is to provide a clear set
of rules for the safe and successful management
of surfing
activity on British beaches.This enables a surf school to comply with current national, regional and local beach,
recreational and sport legislation.
According to the federal government, the
purpose of these changes in is «to focus... on the protection
of fish that support commercial,
recreational or Aboriginal fisheries and to more effectively manage those
activities that pose the greatest threats to these fisheries.»
The court held that the council had licensed the public to use the parkland for normal
recreational purposes carrying normal risks, but that they had not licensed use
of the parkland for any form
of activity however reckless, such as the claimant's getaway run from the taxi.